Abstract
Background: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of facial skin roughness before and after aesthetic treatment in practice and in clinical studies. Objective: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Skin Roughness Scale. Methods: The scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 290) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. Results: A score difference of ≥1 point was shown to reflect a clinically meaningful difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference 1.09 [0.96-1.23] for clinically different image pairs and 0.53 [0.38-0.67] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 validation sessions was almost perfect (weighted kappa = 0.83). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.81, primary end point). Conclusion: The Allergan Skin Roughness Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of midface skin roughness.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | S219-S226 |
| Journal | Dermatologic Surgery |
| Volume | 42 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Dermatology
Cite this
Development and validation of a photonumeric scale for evaluation of facial skin texture. / Donofrio, Lisa; Carruthers, Alastair; Hardas, Bhushan; Murphy, Diane K.; Carruthers, Jean; Jones, Derek; Sykes, Jonathan M; Creutz, Lela; Marx, Ann; Dill, Sara.
In: Dermatologic Surgery, Vol. 42, 2016, p. S219-S226.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of a photonumeric scale for evaluation of facial skin texture
AU - Donofrio, Lisa
AU - Carruthers, Alastair
AU - Hardas, Bhushan
AU - Murphy, Diane K.
AU - Carruthers, Jean
AU - Jones, Derek
AU - Sykes, Jonathan M
AU - Creutz, Lela
AU - Marx, Ann
AU - Dill, Sara
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Background: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of facial skin roughness before and after aesthetic treatment in practice and in clinical studies. Objective: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Skin Roughness Scale. Methods: The scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 290) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. Results: A score difference of ≥1 point was shown to reflect a clinically meaningful difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference 1.09 [0.96-1.23] for clinically different image pairs and 0.53 [0.38-0.67] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 validation sessions was almost perfect (weighted kappa = 0.83). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.81, primary end point). Conclusion: The Allergan Skin Roughness Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of midface skin roughness.
AB - Background: A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of facial skin roughness before and after aesthetic treatment in practice and in clinical studies. Objective: To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Skin Roughness Scale. Methods: The scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 290) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart. Results: A score difference of ≥1 point was shown to reflect a clinically meaningful difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference 1.09 [0.96-1.23] for clinically different image pairs and 0.53 [0.38-0.67] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 validation sessions was almost perfect (weighted kappa = 0.83). Interrater agreement was almost perfect during the second rating session (0.81, primary end point). Conclusion: The Allergan Skin Roughness Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of midface skin roughness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016062188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016062188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000852
DO - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000852
M3 - Article
VL - 42
SP - S219-S226
JO - Dermatologic Surgery
JF - Dermatologic Surgery
SN - 1076-0512
ER -