Developing the master educator: Cross disciplinary Teaching Scholars Program for human and Veterinary Medical faculty

Malathi Srinivasan, Daniel D. Pratt, John Collins, Constance M. Bowe, Frazier T. Stevenson, Stephen J. Pinney, Michael S Wilkes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: At the University of California, Davis (UCD), the authors sought to develop an institutional network of reflective educational leaders. The authors wanted to enhance faculty understanding of medical education's complexity, and improve educators' effectiveness as regional/national leaders. Methods: The UCD Teaching Scholars Program is a half-year course, comprised of 24 weekly half-day small group sessions, for faculty in the School of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine. The program's philosophical framework was centered on personal reflection to enhance change: 1) understanding educational theory to build metacognitive bridges, 2) diversity of perspectives to broaden horizons, 3) colleagues as peer teachers to improve interactive experiences and 4) reciprocal process of testing theory and examining practice to reinforce learning. The authors describe the program development (environmental analysis, marketing, teaching techniques), specific challenges, and failed experiments. The authors provide examples of interactive exercises used to enhance curricular content. The authors enrolled 7-10 faculty per year, from a diverse pool of current and near-future educational leaders. Results: Four years of Teaching Scholars participants were surveyed about program experiences and short/longer term out-comes. Twenty-six (76%) respondents reported that they were very satisfied with the course (4.6/5), individual curricular blocks (4.2-4.6), and other faculty (4.7). They described participation barriers/facilitators. Participants reported positive impact on their effectiveness as educators (100%), course directors (84%), leaders (72%) and educational researchers (52%). They described specific acquired attitudes, knowledge, and skills. They described changes in their approach to education/career changed based on program participation. Combining faculty from different educational backgrounds significantly broadened perspectives, leading to greater/new collaboration. Discussion: Developing a cadre of master educators requires careful program planning, implementation, and program/participant evaluation. Based on participant feedback, our program was a success at stimulating change. This open assessment of programmatic strengths and weaknesses may provide a template for other medical institutions that seek to enhance their institutional educational mission.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)452-464
Number of pages13
JournalAcademic Psychiatry
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Medical Faculties
teaching program
Teaching
educator
leader
Program Development
Veterinary Medicine
career education
veterinary medicine
Program Evaluation
Medical Education
Marketing
program planning
educational theory
participation
cadre
small group
Research Personnel
Medicine
Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Education

Cite this

Developing the master educator : Cross disciplinary Teaching Scholars Program for human and Veterinary Medical faculty. / Srinivasan, Malathi; Pratt, Daniel D.; Collins, John; Bowe, Constance M.; Stevenson, Frazier T.; Pinney, Stephen J.; Wilkes, Michael S.

In: Academic Psychiatry, Vol. 31, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 452-464.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Srinivasan, Malathi ; Pratt, Daniel D. ; Collins, John ; Bowe, Constance M. ; Stevenson, Frazier T. ; Pinney, Stephen J. ; Wilkes, Michael S. / Developing the master educator : Cross disciplinary Teaching Scholars Program for human and Veterinary Medical faculty. In: Academic Psychiatry. 2007 ; Vol. 31, No. 6. pp. 452-464.
@article{c4612e58c2c643f19779a1f46aa18653,
title = "Developing the master educator: Cross disciplinary Teaching Scholars Program for human and Veterinary Medical faculty",
abstract = "Objective: At the University of California, Davis (UCD), the authors sought to develop an institutional network of reflective educational leaders. The authors wanted to enhance faculty understanding of medical education's complexity, and improve educators' effectiveness as regional/national leaders. Methods: The UCD Teaching Scholars Program is a half-year course, comprised of 24 weekly half-day small group sessions, for faculty in the School of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine. The program's philosophical framework was centered on personal reflection to enhance change: 1) understanding educational theory to build metacognitive bridges, 2) diversity of perspectives to broaden horizons, 3) colleagues as peer teachers to improve interactive experiences and 4) reciprocal process of testing theory and examining practice to reinforce learning. The authors describe the program development (environmental analysis, marketing, teaching techniques), specific challenges, and failed experiments. The authors provide examples of interactive exercises used to enhance curricular content. The authors enrolled 7-10 faculty per year, from a diverse pool of current and near-future educational leaders. Results: Four years of Teaching Scholars participants were surveyed about program experiences and short/longer term out-comes. Twenty-six (76{\%}) respondents reported that they were very satisfied with the course (4.6/5), individual curricular blocks (4.2-4.6), and other faculty (4.7). They described participation barriers/facilitators. Participants reported positive impact on their effectiveness as educators (100{\%}), course directors (84{\%}), leaders (72{\%}) and educational researchers (52{\%}). They described specific acquired attitudes, knowledge, and skills. They described changes in their approach to education/career changed based on program participation. Combining faculty from different educational backgrounds significantly broadened perspectives, leading to greater/new collaboration. Discussion: Developing a cadre of master educators requires careful program planning, implementation, and program/participant evaluation. Based on participant feedback, our program was a success at stimulating change. This open assessment of programmatic strengths and weaknesses may provide a template for other medical institutions that seek to enhance their institutional educational mission.",
author = "Malathi Srinivasan and Pratt, {Daniel D.} and John Collins and Bowe, {Constance M.} and Stevenson, {Frazier T.} and Pinney, {Stephen J.} and Wilkes, {Michael S}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.452",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "452--464",
journal = "Academic Psychiatry",
issn = "1042-9670",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing the master educator

T2 - Cross disciplinary Teaching Scholars Program for human and Veterinary Medical faculty

AU - Srinivasan, Malathi

AU - Pratt, Daniel D.

AU - Collins, John

AU - Bowe, Constance M.

AU - Stevenson, Frazier T.

AU - Pinney, Stephen J.

AU - Wilkes, Michael S

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Objective: At the University of California, Davis (UCD), the authors sought to develop an institutional network of reflective educational leaders. The authors wanted to enhance faculty understanding of medical education's complexity, and improve educators' effectiveness as regional/national leaders. Methods: The UCD Teaching Scholars Program is a half-year course, comprised of 24 weekly half-day small group sessions, for faculty in the School of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine. The program's philosophical framework was centered on personal reflection to enhance change: 1) understanding educational theory to build metacognitive bridges, 2) diversity of perspectives to broaden horizons, 3) colleagues as peer teachers to improve interactive experiences and 4) reciprocal process of testing theory and examining practice to reinforce learning. The authors describe the program development (environmental analysis, marketing, teaching techniques), specific challenges, and failed experiments. The authors provide examples of interactive exercises used to enhance curricular content. The authors enrolled 7-10 faculty per year, from a diverse pool of current and near-future educational leaders. Results: Four years of Teaching Scholars participants were surveyed about program experiences and short/longer term out-comes. Twenty-six (76%) respondents reported that they were very satisfied with the course (4.6/5), individual curricular blocks (4.2-4.6), and other faculty (4.7). They described participation barriers/facilitators. Participants reported positive impact on their effectiveness as educators (100%), course directors (84%), leaders (72%) and educational researchers (52%). They described specific acquired attitudes, knowledge, and skills. They described changes in their approach to education/career changed based on program participation. Combining faculty from different educational backgrounds significantly broadened perspectives, leading to greater/new collaboration. Discussion: Developing a cadre of master educators requires careful program planning, implementation, and program/participant evaluation. Based on participant feedback, our program was a success at stimulating change. This open assessment of programmatic strengths and weaknesses may provide a template for other medical institutions that seek to enhance their institutional educational mission.

AB - Objective: At the University of California, Davis (UCD), the authors sought to develop an institutional network of reflective educational leaders. The authors wanted to enhance faculty understanding of medical education's complexity, and improve educators' effectiveness as regional/national leaders. Methods: The UCD Teaching Scholars Program is a half-year course, comprised of 24 weekly half-day small group sessions, for faculty in the School of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine. The program's philosophical framework was centered on personal reflection to enhance change: 1) understanding educational theory to build metacognitive bridges, 2) diversity of perspectives to broaden horizons, 3) colleagues as peer teachers to improve interactive experiences and 4) reciprocal process of testing theory and examining practice to reinforce learning. The authors describe the program development (environmental analysis, marketing, teaching techniques), specific challenges, and failed experiments. The authors provide examples of interactive exercises used to enhance curricular content. The authors enrolled 7-10 faculty per year, from a diverse pool of current and near-future educational leaders. Results: Four years of Teaching Scholars participants were surveyed about program experiences and short/longer term out-comes. Twenty-six (76%) respondents reported that they were very satisfied with the course (4.6/5), individual curricular blocks (4.2-4.6), and other faculty (4.7). They described participation barriers/facilitators. Participants reported positive impact on their effectiveness as educators (100%), course directors (84%), leaders (72%) and educational researchers (52%). They described specific acquired attitudes, knowledge, and skills. They described changes in their approach to education/career changed based on program participation. Combining faculty from different educational backgrounds significantly broadened perspectives, leading to greater/new collaboration. Discussion: Developing a cadre of master educators requires careful program planning, implementation, and program/participant evaluation. Based on participant feedback, our program was a success at stimulating change. This open assessment of programmatic strengths and weaknesses may provide a template for other medical institutions that seek to enhance their institutional educational mission.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40949105717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40949105717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.452

DO - 10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.452

M3 - Article

C2 - 18079507

AN - SCOPUS:40949105717

VL - 31

SP - 452

EP - 464

JO - Academic Psychiatry

JF - Academic Psychiatry

SN - 1042-9670

IS - 6

ER -