Developing consensus on appropriate standards of disaster care for children

Robert K. Kanter, John S. Andrake, Nancy M. Boeing, James Callahan, Arthur Cooper, A. Christine, R. N. Lopez-Dwyer, James P Marcin, Folafoluwa O. Odetola, Anne E. Ryan, Thomas E. Terndrup, Joseph R. Tobin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Neither professional consensus nor evidence exists to guide the choice of essential hospital disaster interventions. The objective of our study was to demonstrate a method for developing consensus on hospital disaster interventions that should be regarded as essential, quantitatively balancing needs and resources. Methods: A panel of pediatric acute care practitioners developed consensus using a modified Delphi process. Interventions were chosen such that workload per staff member would not exceed the previously validated maximum according to the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System. Based on published models, it was assumed that the usual numbers of staff would care for a disaster surge of 4 times the usual number of intensive care and non-intensive care hospital patients. Results: Using a single set of assumptions on constrained resources and overwhelming needs, the panel ranked and agreed on essential interventions. A number of standard interventions would exceed crisis workload constraints, including detailed recording of vital signs and fluid balance, administration of vasoactive agents, invasive monitoring of pressures (central venous, intraarterial, intracranial), dialysis, and tube feedings. Conclusions: The quantitative methodology and consensus development process described in the present report may have utility in future planning. Groups with appropriate expertise must develop action plans according to authority within each jurisdiction, addressing likely disaster scenarios, according to the needs in each medical service region, using available regional resources, and accounting for the capabilities of each institution. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009; 3:27-32).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-32
Number of pages6
JournalDisaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Disasters
Standard of Care
Consensus
Workload
Central Venous Pressure
Water-Electrolyte Balance
Vital Signs
Enteral Nutrition
Critical Care
Dialysis
Patient Care
Public Health
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Critical care
  • Delphi consensus process
  • Disaster
  • Hospital
  • Pediatric
  • Standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Kanter, R. K., Andrake, J. S., Boeing, N. M., Callahan, J., Cooper, A., Christine, A., ... Tobin, J. R. (2009). Developing consensus on appropriate standards of disaster care for children. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 3(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e318190a27a

Developing consensus on appropriate standards of disaster care for children. / Kanter, Robert K.; Andrake, John S.; Boeing, Nancy M.; Callahan, James; Cooper, Arthur; Christine, A.; Lopez-Dwyer, R. N.; Marcin, James P; Odetola, Folafoluwa O.; Ryan, Anne E.; Terndrup, Thomas E.; Tobin, Joseph R.

In: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Vol. 3, No. 1, 03.2009, p. 27-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kanter, RK, Andrake, JS, Boeing, NM, Callahan, J, Cooper, A, Christine, A, Lopez-Dwyer, RN, Marcin, JP, Odetola, FO, Ryan, AE, Terndrup, TE & Tobin, JR 2009, 'Developing consensus on appropriate standards of disaster care for children', Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e318190a27a
Kanter, Robert K. ; Andrake, John S. ; Boeing, Nancy M. ; Callahan, James ; Cooper, Arthur ; Christine, A. ; Lopez-Dwyer, R. N. ; Marcin, James P ; Odetola, Folafoluwa O. ; Ryan, Anne E. ; Terndrup, Thomas E. ; Tobin, Joseph R. / Developing consensus on appropriate standards of disaster care for children. In: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2009 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 27-32.
@article{184f75779533407595ebec60760bf1ab,
title = "Developing consensus on appropriate standards of disaster care for children",
abstract = "Background: Neither professional consensus nor evidence exists to guide the choice of essential hospital disaster interventions. The objective of our study was to demonstrate a method for developing consensus on hospital disaster interventions that should be regarded as essential, quantitatively balancing needs and resources. Methods: A panel of pediatric acute care practitioners developed consensus using a modified Delphi process. Interventions were chosen such that workload per staff member would not exceed the previously validated maximum according to the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System. Based on published models, it was assumed that the usual numbers of staff would care for a disaster surge of 4 times the usual number of intensive care and non-intensive care hospital patients. Results: Using a single set of assumptions on constrained resources and overwhelming needs, the panel ranked and agreed on essential interventions. A number of standard interventions would exceed crisis workload constraints, including detailed recording of vital signs and fluid balance, administration of vasoactive agents, invasive monitoring of pressures (central venous, intraarterial, intracranial), dialysis, and tube feedings. Conclusions: The quantitative methodology and consensus development process described in the present report may have utility in future planning. Groups with appropriate expertise must develop action plans according to authority within each jurisdiction, addressing likely disaster scenarios, according to the needs in each medical service region, using available regional resources, and accounting for the capabilities of each institution. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009; 3:27-32).",
keywords = "Critical care, Delphi consensus process, Disaster, Hospital, Pediatric, Standards",
author = "Kanter, {Robert K.} and Andrake, {John S.} and Boeing, {Nancy M.} and James Callahan and Arthur Cooper and A. Christine and Lopez-Dwyer, {R. N.} and Marcin, {James P} and Odetola, {Folafoluwa O.} and Ryan, {Anne E.} and Terndrup, {Thomas E.} and Tobin, {Joseph R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/DMP.0b013e318190a27a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "27--32",
journal = "Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness",
issn = "1935-7893",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing consensus on appropriate standards of disaster care for children

AU - Kanter, Robert K.

AU - Andrake, John S.

AU - Boeing, Nancy M.

AU - Callahan, James

AU - Cooper, Arthur

AU - Christine, A.

AU - Lopez-Dwyer, R. N.

AU - Marcin, James P

AU - Odetola, Folafoluwa O.

AU - Ryan, Anne E.

AU - Terndrup, Thomas E.

AU - Tobin, Joseph R.

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Background: Neither professional consensus nor evidence exists to guide the choice of essential hospital disaster interventions. The objective of our study was to demonstrate a method for developing consensus on hospital disaster interventions that should be regarded as essential, quantitatively balancing needs and resources. Methods: A panel of pediatric acute care practitioners developed consensus using a modified Delphi process. Interventions were chosen such that workload per staff member would not exceed the previously validated maximum according to the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System. Based on published models, it was assumed that the usual numbers of staff would care for a disaster surge of 4 times the usual number of intensive care and non-intensive care hospital patients. Results: Using a single set of assumptions on constrained resources and overwhelming needs, the panel ranked and agreed on essential interventions. A number of standard interventions would exceed crisis workload constraints, including detailed recording of vital signs and fluid balance, administration of vasoactive agents, invasive monitoring of pressures (central venous, intraarterial, intracranial), dialysis, and tube feedings. Conclusions: The quantitative methodology and consensus development process described in the present report may have utility in future planning. Groups with appropriate expertise must develop action plans according to authority within each jurisdiction, addressing likely disaster scenarios, according to the needs in each medical service region, using available regional resources, and accounting for the capabilities of each institution. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009; 3:27-32).

AB - Background: Neither professional consensus nor evidence exists to guide the choice of essential hospital disaster interventions. The objective of our study was to demonstrate a method for developing consensus on hospital disaster interventions that should be regarded as essential, quantitatively balancing needs and resources. Methods: A panel of pediatric acute care practitioners developed consensus using a modified Delphi process. Interventions were chosen such that workload per staff member would not exceed the previously validated maximum according to the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System. Based on published models, it was assumed that the usual numbers of staff would care for a disaster surge of 4 times the usual number of intensive care and non-intensive care hospital patients. Results: Using a single set of assumptions on constrained resources and overwhelming needs, the panel ranked and agreed on essential interventions. A number of standard interventions would exceed crisis workload constraints, including detailed recording of vital signs and fluid balance, administration of vasoactive agents, invasive monitoring of pressures (central venous, intraarterial, intracranial), dialysis, and tube feedings. Conclusions: The quantitative methodology and consensus development process described in the present report may have utility in future planning. Groups with appropriate expertise must develop action plans according to authority within each jurisdiction, addressing likely disaster scenarios, according to the needs in each medical service region, using available regional resources, and accounting for the capabilities of each institution. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009; 3:27-32).

KW - Critical care

KW - Delphi consensus process

KW - Disaster

KW - Hospital

KW - Pediatric

KW - Standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649322339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649322339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318190a27a

DO - 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318190a27a

M3 - Article

C2 - 19293741

AN - SCOPUS:67649322339

VL - 3

SP - 27

EP - 32

JO - Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

JF - Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

SN - 1935-7893

IS - 1

ER -