Detection of binding artifacts in gel electrofocusing using a polymeric dye probe

Charles B. Cuono, Giselle A. Chapo, Andreas Chrambach, Leonard M Hjelmeland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Poly R‐480, an amphoteric dye of molecular weight 160 000,is the product of copolymerization reaction and can be expected to yield a polydisperse pattern in polyacrylamide gel isoelectric focusing (PAGIF). Such is indeed obtained in conventional PAGIF using commercial synthetic carrier ampholyte mixtures but not in buffer PAGIF, in which a few discrete dye bands are produced. Upon excision of single bands and segments of zones in buffer PAGIF and PAGIF in SCAMs, respectively, the entire original pattern is reestablished in each case, thereby confirming the artifactual nature of both the simple band pattern as well as the polydisperse patten. The simple pattern in buffer PAGIF prevails in the presence of 8 M urea and 8 mM CHAPS, while the polydisperse pattern obtained in SCAMs is resolved into multiple bands in the presence of either one or both of these agents. These observations suggest: a) hydrophobic and hydrogen bond dye‐dye and/or dye‐SCAM interactions produce the artifactual polydisperse pattern in PAGIF in SCAMs, b) electrostatic dye‐dye interactions are responsible for the artifactual simple band pattern in buffer EF, and c) dye‐SCAM electrostatic interactions produce the artifactual multiple band pattern in the SCAM‐urea‐CHAPS system. These data clearly underline the need for critical experimentation in the evaluation of PAGIF bands and band numbers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)404-407
Number of pages4
JournalElectrophoresis
Volume4
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Isoelectric Focusing
Artifacts
Coloring Agents
Gels
Buffers
Ampholyte Mixtures
Coulomb interactions
Static Electricity
polyacrylamide gels
Copolymerization
Urea
Hydrogen
Hydrogen bonds
Molecular Weight
Molecular weight

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Detection of binding artifacts in gel electrofocusing using a polymeric dye probe. / Cuono, Charles B.; Chapo, Giselle A.; Chrambach, Andreas; Hjelmeland, Leonard M.

In: Electrophoresis, Vol. 4, No. 6, 1983, p. 404-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cuono, Charles B. ; Chapo, Giselle A. ; Chrambach, Andreas ; Hjelmeland, Leonard M. / Detection of binding artifacts in gel electrofocusing using a polymeric dye probe. In: Electrophoresis. 1983 ; Vol. 4, No. 6. pp. 404-407.
@article{dd8d1e04580c4fdfab6fcf57ff331b44,
title = "Detection of binding artifacts in gel electrofocusing using a polymeric dye probe",
abstract = "Poly R‐480, an amphoteric dye of molecular weight 160 000,is the product of copolymerization reaction and can be expected to yield a polydisperse pattern in polyacrylamide gel isoelectric focusing (PAGIF). Such is indeed obtained in conventional PAGIF using commercial synthetic carrier ampholyte mixtures but not in buffer PAGIF, in which a few discrete dye bands are produced. Upon excision of single bands and segments of zones in buffer PAGIF and PAGIF in SCAMs, respectively, the entire original pattern is reestablished in each case, thereby confirming the artifactual nature of both the simple band pattern as well as the polydisperse patten. The simple pattern in buffer PAGIF prevails in the presence of 8 M urea and 8 mM CHAPS, while the polydisperse pattern obtained in SCAMs is resolved into multiple bands in the presence of either one or both of these agents. These observations suggest: a) hydrophobic and hydrogen bond dye‐dye and/or dye‐SCAM interactions produce the artifactual polydisperse pattern in PAGIF in SCAMs, b) electrostatic dye‐dye interactions are responsible for the artifactual simple band pattern in buffer EF, and c) dye‐SCAM electrostatic interactions produce the artifactual multiple band pattern in the SCAM‐urea‐CHAPS system. These data clearly underline the need for critical experimentation in the evaluation of PAGIF bands and band numbers.",
author = "Cuono, {Charles B.} and Chapo, {Giselle A.} and Andreas Chrambach and Hjelmeland, {Leonard M}",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.1002/elps.1150040607",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "404--407",
journal = "Electrophoresis",
issn = "0173-0835",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of binding artifacts in gel electrofocusing using a polymeric dye probe

AU - Cuono, Charles B.

AU - Chapo, Giselle A.

AU - Chrambach, Andreas

AU - Hjelmeland, Leonard M

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - Poly R‐480, an amphoteric dye of molecular weight 160 000,is the product of copolymerization reaction and can be expected to yield a polydisperse pattern in polyacrylamide gel isoelectric focusing (PAGIF). Such is indeed obtained in conventional PAGIF using commercial synthetic carrier ampholyte mixtures but not in buffer PAGIF, in which a few discrete dye bands are produced. Upon excision of single bands and segments of zones in buffer PAGIF and PAGIF in SCAMs, respectively, the entire original pattern is reestablished in each case, thereby confirming the artifactual nature of both the simple band pattern as well as the polydisperse patten. The simple pattern in buffer PAGIF prevails in the presence of 8 M urea and 8 mM CHAPS, while the polydisperse pattern obtained in SCAMs is resolved into multiple bands in the presence of either one or both of these agents. These observations suggest: a) hydrophobic and hydrogen bond dye‐dye and/or dye‐SCAM interactions produce the artifactual polydisperse pattern in PAGIF in SCAMs, b) electrostatic dye‐dye interactions are responsible for the artifactual simple band pattern in buffer EF, and c) dye‐SCAM electrostatic interactions produce the artifactual multiple band pattern in the SCAM‐urea‐CHAPS system. These data clearly underline the need for critical experimentation in the evaluation of PAGIF bands and band numbers.

AB - Poly R‐480, an amphoteric dye of molecular weight 160 000,is the product of copolymerization reaction and can be expected to yield a polydisperse pattern in polyacrylamide gel isoelectric focusing (PAGIF). Such is indeed obtained in conventional PAGIF using commercial synthetic carrier ampholyte mixtures but not in buffer PAGIF, in which a few discrete dye bands are produced. Upon excision of single bands and segments of zones in buffer PAGIF and PAGIF in SCAMs, respectively, the entire original pattern is reestablished in each case, thereby confirming the artifactual nature of both the simple band pattern as well as the polydisperse patten. The simple pattern in buffer PAGIF prevails in the presence of 8 M urea and 8 mM CHAPS, while the polydisperse pattern obtained in SCAMs is resolved into multiple bands in the presence of either one or both of these agents. These observations suggest: a) hydrophobic and hydrogen bond dye‐dye and/or dye‐SCAM interactions produce the artifactual polydisperse pattern in PAGIF in SCAMs, b) electrostatic dye‐dye interactions are responsible for the artifactual simple band pattern in buffer EF, and c) dye‐SCAM electrostatic interactions produce the artifactual multiple band pattern in the SCAM‐urea‐CHAPS system. These data clearly underline the need for critical experimentation in the evaluation of PAGIF bands and band numbers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988141847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988141847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/elps.1150040607

DO - 10.1002/elps.1150040607

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988141847

VL - 4

SP - 404

EP - 407

JO - Electrophoresis

JF - Electrophoresis

SN - 0173-0835

IS - 6

ER -