Design standards for experimental and field studies to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of tests for infectious diseases in aquatic animals

E. Laurin, K. K. Thakur, Ian Gardner, P. Hick, N. J.G. Moody, M. S.J. Crane, I. Ernst

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Design and reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies (DAS) are important metrics for assessing utility of tests used in animal and human health. Following standards for designing DAS will assist in appropriate test selection for specific testing purposes and minimize the risk of reporting biased sensitivity and specificity estimates. To examine the benefits of recommending standards, design information from published DAS literature was assessed for 10 finfish, seven mollusc, nine crustacean and two amphibian diseases listed in the 2017 OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals. Of the 56 DAS identified, 41 were based on field testing, eight on experimental challenge studies and seven on both. Also, we adapted human and terrestrial-animal standards and guidelines for DAS structure for use in aquatic animal diagnostic research. Through this process, we identified and addressed important metrics for consideration at the design phase: study purpose, targeted disease state, selection of appropriate samples and specimens, laboratory analytical methods, statistical methods and data interpretation. These recommended design standards for DAS are presented as a checklist including risk-of-failure points and actions to mitigate bias at each critical step. Adherence to standards when designing DAS will also facilitate future systematic review and meta-analyses of DAS research literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)729-749
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Fish Diseases
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

infectious disease
Routine Diagnostic Tests
infectious diseases
Communicable Diseases
Research Design
experimental study
animals
testing
Statistical Data Interpretation
finfish
Mollusca
data interpretation
Amphibians
standards and grades
Checklist
amphibian
mollusc
crustacean
Meta-Analysis
analytical method

Keywords

  • aquatic animals
  • design standards
  • diagnostic accuracy
  • fish
  • sensitivity and specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • veterinary (miscalleneous)

Cite this

Design standards for experimental and field studies to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of tests for infectious diseases in aquatic animals. / Laurin, E.; Thakur, K. K.; Gardner, Ian; Hick, P.; Moody, N. J.G.; Crane, M. S.J.; Ernst, I.

In: Journal of Fish Diseases, Vol. 41, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 729-749.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Laurin, E. ; Thakur, K. K. ; Gardner, Ian ; Hick, P. ; Moody, N. J.G. ; Crane, M. S.J. ; Ernst, I. / Design standards for experimental and field studies to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of tests for infectious diseases in aquatic animals. In: Journal of Fish Diseases. 2018 ; Vol. 41, No. 5. pp. 729-749.
@article{0e35c9c754b94d7e90c0c752eae4fed4,
title = "Design standards for experimental and field studies to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of tests for infectious diseases in aquatic animals",
abstract = "Design and reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies (DAS) are important metrics for assessing utility of tests used in animal and human health. Following standards for designing DAS will assist in appropriate test selection for specific testing purposes and minimize the risk of reporting biased sensitivity and specificity estimates. To examine the benefits of recommending standards, design information from published DAS literature was assessed for 10 finfish, seven mollusc, nine crustacean and two amphibian diseases listed in the 2017 OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals. Of the 56 DAS identified, 41 were based on field testing, eight on experimental challenge studies and seven on both. Also, we adapted human and terrestrial-animal standards and guidelines for DAS structure for use in aquatic animal diagnostic research. Through this process, we identified and addressed important metrics for consideration at the design phase: study purpose, targeted disease state, selection of appropriate samples and specimens, laboratory analytical methods, statistical methods and data interpretation. These recommended design standards for DAS are presented as a checklist including risk-of-failure points and actions to mitigate bias at each critical step. Adherence to standards when designing DAS will also facilitate future systematic review and meta-analyses of DAS research literature.",
keywords = "aquatic animals, design standards, diagnostic accuracy, fish, sensitivity and specificity",
author = "E. Laurin and Thakur, {K. K.} and Ian Gardner and P. Hick and Moody, {N. J.G.} and Crane, {M. S.J.} and I. Ernst",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jfd.12792",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "729--749",
journal = "Journal of Fish Diseases",
issn = "0140-7775",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design standards for experimental and field studies to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of tests for infectious diseases in aquatic animals

AU - Laurin, E.

AU - Thakur, K. K.

AU - Gardner, Ian

AU - Hick, P.

AU - Moody, N. J.G.

AU - Crane, M. S.J.

AU - Ernst, I.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Design and reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies (DAS) are important metrics for assessing utility of tests used in animal and human health. Following standards for designing DAS will assist in appropriate test selection for specific testing purposes and minimize the risk of reporting biased sensitivity and specificity estimates. To examine the benefits of recommending standards, design information from published DAS literature was assessed for 10 finfish, seven mollusc, nine crustacean and two amphibian diseases listed in the 2017 OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals. Of the 56 DAS identified, 41 were based on field testing, eight on experimental challenge studies and seven on both. Also, we adapted human and terrestrial-animal standards and guidelines for DAS structure for use in aquatic animal diagnostic research. Through this process, we identified and addressed important metrics for consideration at the design phase: study purpose, targeted disease state, selection of appropriate samples and specimens, laboratory analytical methods, statistical methods and data interpretation. These recommended design standards for DAS are presented as a checklist including risk-of-failure points and actions to mitigate bias at each critical step. Adherence to standards when designing DAS will also facilitate future systematic review and meta-analyses of DAS research literature.

AB - Design and reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies (DAS) are important metrics for assessing utility of tests used in animal and human health. Following standards for designing DAS will assist in appropriate test selection for specific testing purposes and minimize the risk of reporting biased sensitivity and specificity estimates. To examine the benefits of recommending standards, design information from published DAS literature was assessed for 10 finfish, seven mollusc, nine crustacean and two amphibian diseases listed in the 2017 OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests for Aquatic Animals. Of the 56 DAS identified, 41 were based on field testing, eight on experimental challenge studies and seven on both. Also, we adapted human and terrestrial-animal standards and guidelines for DAS structure for use in aquatic animal diagnostic research. Through this process, we identified and addressed important metrics for consideration at the design phase: study purpose, targeted disease state, selection of appropriate samples and specimens, laboratory analytical methods, statistical methods and data interpretation. These recommended design standards for DAS are presented as a checklist including risk-of-failure points and actions to mitigate bias at each critical step. Adherence to standards when designing DAS will also facilitate future systematic review and meta-analyses of DAS research literature.

KW - aquatic animals

KW - design standards

KW - diagnostic accuracy

KW - fish

KW - sensitivity and specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045130391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045130391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jfd.12792

DO - 10.1111/jfd.12792

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29542822

AN - SCOPUS:85045130391

VL - 41

SP - 729

EP - 749

JO - Journal of Fish Diseases

JF - Journal of Fish Diseases

SN - 0140-7775

IS - 5

ER -