Descriptive survey and Salmonella surveillance of pastured poultry layer farms in California

Naomi Dailey, Deb Niemeier, Carine Elkhoraibi, Carlos G Senties-cue, Maurice Pitesky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While pasture-raised poultry comprises a small portion of the commercial poultry industry in North America, these alternative rearing systems have become increasingly popular. As such, it is critical to improve our understanding of husbandry practices and prevalence of zoonotic and epizoonotic diseases in these systems. This research reviews the results of a survey sent to 82 commercial pastured poultry farms in California. While the survey response was low (13.4%), it was enhanced by detailed in-person interviews and farm visits. In addition, we conducted drag swabs for Salmonella Enteritidis. On average, farms utilized 12.3% of their total farmland for pastured poultry operations, which often coexisted with other livestock (45%), touch crops (27%), and non-touch crops (45%). While the mean (44.6 sq. ft./hen) and median (22.2 sq. ft./hen) pasture stocking densities were within auditing guidelines, the mean (1.2 sq. ft./hen) and median (0.5 sq. ft./hen) coop stocking densities were below the pending USDA (2016) guidelines recommended in 7 CFR Part 205. Drag swab results showed the presence of Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) in the environment of one of the 11 farms (9.1%). In addition, Salmonella Pullorum (SP) whole blood agglutination tests were used to understand the prevalence of Salmonella spp. in laying hens within the studied farms. Results showed the presence of antibodies in flocks at six of the seven non-SE vaccinated farms, with a mean on-farm prevalence of 25.6% in laying hens. Logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for Group D Salmonella exposure in non-vaccinated flocks, using the SP blood agglutination data as the dependent variable and the survey questions as the independent variables. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) risk factors included exposed wire floors and flock size. These results improve our understanding of Salmonella prevalence and husbandry practices on commercial pastured poultry farms in California.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)957-965
Number of pages9
JournalPoultry Science
Volume96
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Salmonella
poultry
farms
monitoring
hens
Salmonella Pullorum
flocks
Salmonella Enteritidis
stocking rate
laying hens
risk factors
pastures
poultry industry
blood
touch (sensation)
agglutination tests
agglutination
crops
wire
USDA

Keywords

  • husbandry
  • pastured poultry
  • Salmonella

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Descriptive survey and Salmonella surveillance of pastured poultry layer farms in California. / Dailey, Naomi; Niemeier, Deb; Elkhoraibi, Carine; Senties-cue, Carlos G; Pitesky, Maurice.

In: Poultry Science, Vol. 96, No. 4, 01.04.2017, p. 957-965.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dailey, Naomi ; Niemeier, Deb ; Elkhoraibi, Carine ; Senties-cue, Carlos G ; Pitesky, Maurice. / Descriptive survey and Salmonella surveillance of pastured poultry layer farms in California. In: Poultry Science. 2017 ; Vol. 96, No. 4. pp. 957-965.
@article{4b37cc3487d749b8a4c6fe37160ecf06,
title = "Descriptive survey and Salmonella surveillance of pastured poultry layer farms in California",
abstract = "While pasture-raised poultry comprises a small portion of the commercial poultry industry in North America, these alternative rearing systems have become increasingly popular. As such, it is critical to improve our understanding of husbandry practices and prevalence of zoonotic and epizoonotic diseases in these systems. This research reviews the results of a survey sent to 82 commercial pastured poultry farms in California. While the survey response was low (13.4{\%}), it was enhanced by detailed in-person interviews and farm visits. In addition, we conducted drag swabs for Salmonella Enteritidis. On average, farms utilized 12.3{\%} of their total farmland for pastured poultry operations, which often coexisted with other livestock (45{\%}), touch crops (27{\%}), and non-touch crops (45{\%}). While the mean (44.6 sq. ft./hen) and median (22.2 sq. ft./hen) pasture stocking densities were within auditing guidelines, the mean (1.2 sq. ft./hen) and median (0.5 sq. ft./hen) coop stocking densities were below the pending USDA (2016) guidelines recommended in 7 CFR Part 205. Drag swab results showed the presence of Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) in the environment of one of the 11 farms (9.1{\%}). In addition, Salmonella Pullorum (SP) whole blood agglutination tests were used to understand the prevalence of Salmonella spp. in laying hens within the studied farms. Results showed the presence of antibodies in flocks at six of the seven non-SE vaccinated farms, with a mean on-farm prevalence of 25.6{\%} in laying hens. Logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for Group D Salmonella exposure in non-vaccinated flocks, using the SP blood agglutination data as the dependent variable and the survey questions as the independent variables. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) risk factors included exposed wire floors and flock size. These results improve our understanding of Salmonella prevalence and husbandry practices on commercial pastured poultry farms in California.",
keywords = "husbandry, pastured poultry, Salmonella",
author = "Naomi Dailey and Deb Niemeier and Carine Elkhoraibi and Senties-cue, {Carlos G} and Maurice Pitesky",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3382/ps/pew360",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "957--965",
journal = "Poultry Science",
issn = "0032-5791",
publisher = "Poultry Science Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Descriptive survey and Salmonella surveillance of pastured poultry layer farms in California

AU - Dailey, Naomi

AU - Niemeier, Deb

AU - Elkhoraibi, Carine

AU - Senties-cue, Carlos G

AU - Pitesky, Maurice

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - While pasture-raised poultry comprises a small portion of the commercial poultry industry in North America, these alternative rearing systems have become increasingly popular. As such, it is critical to improve our understanding of husbandry practices and prevalence of zoonotic and epizoonotic diseases in these systems. This research reviews the results of a survey sent to 82 commercial pastured poultry farms in California. While the survey response was low (13.4%), it was enhanced by detailed in-person interviews and farm visits. In addition, we conducted drag swabs for Salmonella Enteritidis. On average, farms utilized 12.3% of their total farmland for pastured poultry operations, which often coexisted with other livestock (45%), touch crops (27%), and non-touch crops (45%). While the mean (44.6 sq. ft./hen) and median (22.2 sq. ft./hen) pasture stocking densities were within auditing guidelines, the mean (1.2 sq. ft./hen) and median (0.5 sq. ft./hen) coop stocking densities were below the pending USDA (2016) guidelines recommended in 7 CFR Part 205. Drag swab results showed the presence of Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) in the environment of one of the 11 farms (9.1%). In addition, Salmonella Pullorum (SP) whole blood agglutination tests were used to understand the prevalence of Salmonella spp. in laying hens within the studied farms. Results showed the presence of antibodies in flocks at six of the seven non-SE vaccinated farms, with a mean on-farm prevalence of 25.6% in laying hens. Logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for Group D Salmonella exposure in non-vaccinated flocks, using the SP blood agglutination data as the dependent variable and the survey questions as the independent variables. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) risk factors included exposed wire floors and flock size. These results improve our understanding of Salmonella prevalence and husbandry practices on commercial pastured poultry farms in California.

AB - While pasture-raised poultry comprises a small portion of the commercial poultry industry in North America, these alternative rearing systems have become increasingly popular. As such, it is critical to improve our understanding of husbandry practices and prevalence of zoonotic and epizoonotic diseases in these systems. This research reviews the results of a survey sent to 82 commercial pastured poultry farms in California. While the survey response was low (13.4%), it was enhanced by detailed in-person interviews and farm visits. In addition, we conducted drag swabs for Salmonella Enteritidis. On average, farms utilized 12.3% of their total farmland for pastured poultry operations, which often coexisted with other livestock (45%), touch crops (27%), and non-touch crops (45%). While the mean (44.6 sq. ft./hen) and median (22.2 sq. ft./hen) pasture stocking densities were within auditing guidelines, the mean (1.2 sq. ft./hen) and median (0.5 sq. ft./hen) coop stocking densities were below the pending USDA (2016) guidelines recommended in 7 CFR Part 205. Drag swab results showed the presence of Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) in the environment of one of the 11 farms (9.1%). In addition, Salmonella Pullorum (SP) whole blood agglutination tests were used to understand the prevalence of Salmonella spp. in laying hens within the studied farms. Results showed the presence of antibodies in flocks at six of the seven non-SE vaccinated farms, with a mean on-farm prevalence of 25.6% in laying hens. Logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for Group D Salmonella exposure in non-vaccinated flocks, using the SP blood agglutination data as the dependent variable and the survey questions as the independent variables. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) risk factors included exposed wire floors and flock size. These results improve our understanding of Salmonella prevalence and husbandry practices on commercial pastured poultry farms in California.

KW - husbandry

KW - pastured poultry

KW - Salmonella

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029551501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029551501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3382/ps/pew360

DO - 10.3382/ps/pew360

M3 - Article

C2 - 27744297

AN - SCOPUS:85029551501

VL - 96

SP - 957

EP - 965

JO - Poultry Science

JF - Poultry Science

SN - 0032-5791

IS - 4

ER -