Descriptive and multivariate analysis of the pig sector in Georgia and its implications for disease transmission

Daniel Beltrán-Alcrudo, Esther A. Kukielka, Nienke De Groot, Klaas Dietze, Mikheil Sokhadze, Beatriz Martinez Lopez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Georgia is a country in the Caucasus region with a traditional backyard and highly variable pig farming system. The practices of such sectors have seldom been described and analyzed to better understand their implication in the introduction and spread of infectious pig diseases. Moreover, the Georgian pig sector was badly hit by an epidemic of African swine fever in 2007 that quickly spread throughout the region. Materials and methods We interviewed 487 pig farmers and 116 butchers using closed questionnaires on socioeconomic issues related to pig production, husbandry practices, biosecurity, marketing and movements, and disease awareness. Surveys were conducted in four regions of Georgia and descriptive statistics were computed. Factorial analyses of mixed data and hierarchical clustering on principal components were applied to study the relationship among collected variables for both farmers and butchers. Results Results show that pig farming in Georgia is a non-professional sector, highly heterogeneous by region, characterized by smallholdings of few animals, with low inputs, outdated technologies, and poor biosecurity, which all translates into low outputs and productivity. The hierarchical clustering on principal components confirmed that there are five major production and husbandry strategies, which match the four regions where the study was conducted. Conclusions Our results are the first step to quantify biosecurity gaps and risky behaviours, develop risk profiles, and identify critical control points across the market chain where to implement mitigation measures. This study provides the baseline information needed to design realistic and sustainable prevention, surveillance and control strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0202800
JournalPLoS One
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

disease transmission
multivariate analysis
biosecurity
Swine
Multivariate Analysis
swine
Marketing
Animals
farming systems
Productivity
Statistics
African swine fever
farmers
risk profile
Agriculture
critical control points
swine diseases
Cluster Analysis
African Swine Fever
marketing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Descriptive and multivariate analysis of the pig sector in Georgia and its implications for disease transmission. / Beltrán-Alcrudo, Daniel; Kukielka, Esther A.; De Groot, Nienke; Dietze, Klaas; Sokhadze, Mikheil; Martinez Lopez, Beatriz.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 13, No. 8, e0202800, 01.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beltrán-Alcrudo, Daniel ; Kukielka, Esther A. ; De Groot, Nienke ; Dietze, Klaas ; Sokhadze, Mikheil ; Martinez Lopez, Beatriz. / Descriptive and multivariate analysis of the pig sector in Georgia and its implications for disease transmission. In: PLoS One. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 8.
@article{b8f7fc7ff1ae4c1c80c16aa91cba14d0,
title = "Descriptive and multivariate analysis of the pig sector in Georgia and its implications for disease transmission",
abstract = "Background Georgia is a country in the Caucasus region with a traditional backyard and highly variable pig farming system. The practices of such sectors have seldom been described and analyzed to better understand their implication in the introduction and spread of infectious pig diseases. Moreover, the Georgian pig sector was badly hit by an epidemic of African swine fever in 2007 that quickly spread throughout the region. Materials and methods We interviewed 487 pig farmers and 116 butchers using closed questionnaires on socioeconomic issues related to pig production, husbandry practices, biosecurity, marketing and movements, and disease awareness. Surveys were conducted in four regions of Georgia and descriptive statistics were computed. Factorial analyses of mixed data and hierarchical clustering on principal components were applied to study the relationship among collected variables for both farmers and butchers. Results Results show that pig farming in Georgia is a non-professional sector, highly heterogeneous by region, characterized by smallholdings of few animals, with low inputs, outdated technologies, and poor biosecurity, which all translates into low outputs and productivity. The hierarchical clustering on principal components confirmed that there are five major production and husbandry strategies, which match the four regions where the study was conducted. Conclusions Our results are the first step to quantify biosecurity gaps and risky behaviours, develop risk profiles, and identify critical control points across the market chain where to implement mitigation measures. This study provides the baseline information needed to design realistic and sustainable prevention, surveillance and control strategies.",
author = "Daniel Beltr{\'a}n-Alcrudo and Kukielka, {Esther A.} and {De Groot}, Nienke and Klaas Dietze and Mikheil Sokhadze and {Martinez Lopez}, Beatriz",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0202800",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Descriptive and multivariate analysis of the pig sector in Georgia and its implications for disease transmission

AU - Beltrán-Alcrudo, Daniel

AU - Kukielka, Esther A.

AU - De Groot, Nienke

AU - Dietze, Klaas

AU - Sokhadze, Mikheil

AU - Martinez Lopez, Beatriz

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Background Georgia is a country in the Caucasus region with a traditional backyard and highly variable pig farming system. The practices of such sectors have seldom been described and analyzed to better understand their implication in the introduction and spread of infectious pig diseases. Moreover, the Georgian pig sector was badly hit by an epidemic of African swine fever in 2007 that quickly spread throughout the region. Materials and methods We interviewed 487 pig farmers and 116 butchers using closed questionnaires on socioeconomic issues related to pig production, husbandry practices, biosecurity, marketing and movements, and disease awareness. Surveys were conducted in four regions of Georgia and descriptive statistics were computed. Factorial analyses of mixed data and hierarchical clustering on principal components were applied to study the relationship among collected variables for both farmers and butchers. Results Results show that pig farming in Georgia is a non-professional sector, highly heterogeneous by region, characterized by smallholdings of few animals, with low inputs, outdated technologies, and poor biosecurity, which all translates into low outputs and productivity. The hierarchical clustering on principal components confirmed that there are five major production and husbandry strategies, which match the four regions where the study was conducted. Conclusions Our results are the first step to quantify biosecurity gaps and risky behaviours, develop risk profiles, and identify critical control points across the market chain where to implement mitigation measures. This study provides the baseline information needed to design realistic and sustainable prevention, surveillance and control strategies.

AB - Background Georgia is a country in the Caucasus region with a traditional backyard and highly variable pig farming system. The practices of such sectors have seldom been described and analyzed to better understand their implication in the introduction and spread of infectious pig diseases. Moreover, the Georgian pig sector was badly hit by an epidemic of African swine fever in 2007 that quickly spread throughout the region. Materials and methods We interviewed 487 pig farmers and 116 butchers using closed questionnaires on socioeconomic issues related to pig production, husbandry practices, biosecurity, marketing and movements, and disease awareness. Surveys were conducted in four regions of Georgia and descriptive statistics were computed. Factorial analyses of mixed data and hierarchical clustering on principal components were applied to study the relationship among collected variables for both farmers and butchers. Results Results show that pig farming in Georgia is a non-professional sector, highly heterogeneous by region, characterized by smallholdings of few animals, with low inputs, outdated technologies, and poor biosecurity, which all translates into low outputs and productivity. The hierarchical clustering on principal components confirmed that there are five major production and husbandry strategies, which match the four regions where the study was conducted. Conclusions Our results are the first step to quantify biosecurity gaps and risky behaviours, develop risk profiles, and identify critical control points across the market chain where to implement mitigation measures. This study provides the baseline information needed to design realistic and sustainable prevention, surveillance and control strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052231885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052231885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0202800

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0202800

M3 - Article

C2 - 30142224

AN - SCOPUS:85052231885

VL - 13

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 8

M1 - e0202800

ER -