Dermal suture only versus layered closure: A randomized, split wound comparative effectiveness trial

Jayne S. Joo, Anne R. Zhuang, Catherine Tchanque-Fossuo, Danielle Tartar, April W. Armstrong, Tom H. King, Raja K. Sivamani, Daniel B. Eisen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Layered closure of cutaneous wounds is a commonly used surgical practice. However, there are studies that suggest the additional layer of epidermal sutures might not be necessary. Objective: To compare scar outcomes between the single-layer deep-dermal suture technique and the conventional layered suture technique for primary closure of cutaneous wounds. Methods: A total of 49 patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded, split scar study to compare the conventional bilayered closure technique with the single-layer deep-dermal suturing technique for primary closure of wounds. The primary outcome measure was mean sum Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score at 3 and 12 months. Results: At the 3-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean total POSAS scores for both the blinded observer and patients, indicating a preference for the side with the standard layered closure. However, at the 12-month follow-up, this difference was lost, with the exception of scar color, which was significantly more noticeable on the wound side closed with only dermal sutures. Limitation: Single-center study. Conclusion: Three months after surgery, the layered closure technique resulted in a slightly better scar outcome than the single-layered closure containing only dermal sutures. At 12-months' follow-up, this difference diminished, with scars for both sides appearing similar.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Sutures
Cicatrix
Skin
Wounds and Injuries
Suture Techniques
Wound Closure Techniques
Color
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • scar
  • skin surgery
  • suture technique
  • wound closure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Dermal suture only versus layered closure : A randomized, split wound comparative effectiveness trial. / Joo, Jayne S.; Zhuang, Anne R.; Tchanque-Fossuo, Catherine; Tartar, Danielle; Armstrong, April W.; King, Tom H.; Sivamani, Raja K.; Eisen, Daniel B.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a81311d0ffad42d992ddd7c69cd25097,
title = "Dermal suture only versus layered closure: A randomized, split wound comparative effectiveness trial",
abstract = "Background: Layered closure of cutaneous wounds is a commonly used surgical practice. However, there are studies that suggest the additional layer of epidermal sutures might not be necessary. Objective: To compare scar outcomes between the single-layer deep-dermal suture technique and the conventional layered suture technique for primary closure of cutaneous wounds. Methods: A total of 49 patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded, split scar study to compare the conventional bilayered closure technique with the single-layer deep-dermal suturing technique for primary closure of wounds. The primary outcome measure was mean sum Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score at 3 and 12 months. Results: At the 3-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean total POSAS scores for both the blinded observer and patients, indicating a preference for the side with the standard layered closure. However, at the 12-month follow-up, this difference was lost, with the exception of scar color, which was significantly more noticeable on the wound side closed with only dermal sutures. Limitation: Single-center study. Conclusion: Three months after surgery, the layered closure technique resulted in a slightly better scar outcome than the single-layered closure containing only dermal sutures. At 12-months' follow-up, this difference diminished, with scars for both sides appearing similar.",
keywords = "scar, skin surgery, suture technique, wound closure",
author = "Joo, {Jayne S.} and Zhuang, {Anne R.} and Catherine Tchanque-Fossuo and Danielle Tartar and Armstrong, {April W.} and King, {Tom H.} and Sivamani, {Raja K.} and Eisen, {Daniel B.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.040",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology",
issn = "0190-9622",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dermal suture only versus layered closure

T2 - A randomized, split wound comparative effectiveness trial

AU - Joo, Jayne S.

AU - Zhuang, Anne R.

AU - Tchanque-Fossuo, Catherine

AU - Tartar, Danielle

AU - Armstrong, April W.

AU - King, Tom H.

AU - Sivamani, Raja K.

AU - Eisen, Daniel B.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Layered closure of cutaneous wounds is a commonly used surgical practice. However, there are studies that suggest the additional layer of epidermal sutures might not be necessary. Objective: To compare scar outcomes between the single-layer deep-dermal suture technique and the conventional layered suture technique for primary closure of cutaneous wounds. Methods: A total of 49 patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded, split scar study to compare the conventional bilayered closure technique with the single-layer deep-dermal suturing technique for primary closure of wounds. The primary outcome measure was mean sum Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score at 3 and 12 months. Results: At the 3-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean total POSAS scores for both the blinded observer and patients, indicating a preference for the side with the standard layered closure. However, at the 12-month follow-up, this difference was lost, with the exception of scar color, which was significantly more noticeable on the wound side closed with only dermal sutures. Limitation: Single-center study. Conclusion: Three months after surgery, the layered closure technique resulted in a slightly better scar outcome than the single-layered closure containing only dermal sutures. At 12-months' follow-up, this difference diminished, with scars for both sides appearing similar.

AB - Background: Layered closure of cutaneous wounds is a commonly used surgical practice. However, there are studies that suggest the additional layer of epidermal sutures might not be necessary. Objective: To compare scar outcomes between the single-layer deep-dermal suture technique and the conventional layered suture technique for primary closure of cutaneous wounds. Methods: A total of 49 patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded, split scar study to compare the conventional bilayered closure technique with the single-layer deep-dermal suturing technique for primary closure of wounds. The primary outcome measure was mean sum Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score at 3 and 12 months. Results: At the 3-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean total POSAS scores for both the blinded observer and patients, indicating a preference for the side with the standard layered closure. However, at the 12-month follow-up, this difference was lost, with the exception of scar color, which was significantly more noticeable on the wound side closed with only dermal sutures. Limitation: Single-center study. Conclusion: Three months after surgery, the layered closure technique resulted in a slightly better scar outcome than the single-layered closure containing only dermal sutures. At 12-months' follow-up, this difference diminished, with scars for both sides appearing similar.

KW - scar

KW - skin surgery

KW - suture technique

KW - wound closure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073563449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073563449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.040

DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.040

M3 - Article

C2 - 31442535

AN - SCOPUS:85073563449

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

SN - 0190-9622

ER -