Demographic characteristics do not decrease the utility of depressive symptoms assessments: Examining the practical impact of item bias in four heterogeneous samples of older adults

Natalia O. Dmitrieva, Denise Fyffe, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Robert Fieo, Laura B. Zahodne, Jamie Hamilton, Guy G. Potter, Jennifer J. Manly, Heather R. Romero, Dan M Mungas, Laura E. Gibbons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have identified differential item function (DIF) in depressive symptoms measures, but the impact of DIF has been rarely reported. Given the critical importance of depressive symptoms assessment among older adults, we examined whether DIF due to demographic characteristics resulted in salient score changes in commonly used measures. Methods: Four longitudinal studies of cognitive aging provided a sample size of 3754 older adults and included individuals both with and without a clinical diagnosis of major depression. Each study administered at least one of the following measures: the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (20-item ordinal response or 10-item dichotomous response versions), the Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Hybrid logistic regression-item response theory methods were used to examine the presence and impact of DIF due to age, sex, race/ethnicity, and years of education on the depressive symptoms items. Results: Although statistically significant DIF due to demographic factors was present on several items, its cumulative impact on depressive symptoms scores was practically negligible. Conclusions: The findings support substantive meaningfulness of previously reported demographic differences in depressive symptoms among older adults, showing that these individual differences were unlikely to have resulted from item bias attributable to demographic characteristics we examined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)88-96
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Symptom Assessment
Demography
Depression
Individuality
Geriatrics
Sample Size
Longitudinal Studies
Epidemiologic Studies
Logistic Models
Education

Keywords

  • CES-D
  • Depressive symptoms
  • Differential item function
  • GDS
  • Item bias
  • MADRS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Demographic characteristics do not decrease the utility of depressive symptoms assessments : Examining the practical impact of item bias in four heterogeneous samples of older adults. / Dmitrieva, Natalia O.; Fyffe, Denise; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata; Fieo, Robert; Zahodne, Laura B.; Hamilton, Jamie; Potter, Guy G.; Manly, Jennifer J.; Romero, Heather R.; Mungas, Dan M; Gibbons, Laura E.

In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 88-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dmitrieva, Natalia O. ; Fyffe, Denise ; Mukherjee, Shubhabrata ; Fieo, Robert ; Zahodne, Laura B. ; Hamilton, Jamie ; Potter, Guy G. ; Manly, Jennifer J. ; Romero, Heather R. ; Mungas, Dan M ; Gibbons, Laura E. / Demographic characteristics do not decrease the utility of depressive symptoms assessments : Examining the practical impact of item bias in four heterogeneous samples of older adults. In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 88-96.
@article{ef153c69477648fca54bcc4b16e72722,
title = "Demographic characteristics do not decrease the utility of depressive symptoms assessments: Examining the practical impact of item bias in four heterogeneous samples of older adults",
abstract = "Objective: Previous studies have identified differential item function (DIF) in depressive symptoms measures, but the impact of DIF has been rarely reported. Given the critical importance of depressive symptoms assessment among older adults, we examined whether DIF due to demographic characteristics resulted in salient score changes in commonly used measures. Methods: Four longitudinal studies of cognitive aging provided a sample size of 3754 older adults and included individuals both with and without a clinical diagnosis of major depression. Each study administered at least one of the following measures: the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (20-item ordinal response or 10-item dichotomous response versions), the Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Montgomery-{\AA}sberg Depression Rating Scale. Hybrid logistic regression-item response theory methods were used to examine the presence and impact of DIF due to age, sex, race/ethnicity, and years of education on the depressive symptoms items. Results: Although statistically significant DIF due to demographic factors was present on several items, its cumulative impact on depressive symptoms scores was practically negligible. Conclusions: The findings support substantive meaningfulness of previously reported demographic differences in depressive symptoms among older adults, showing that these individual differences were unlikely to have resulted from item bias attributable to demographic characteristics we examined.",
keywords = "CES-D, Depressive symptoms, Differential item function, GDS, Item bias, MADRS",
author = "Dmitrieva, {Natalia O.} and Denise Fyffe and Shubhabrata Mukherjee and Robert Fieo and Zahodne, {Laura B.} and Jamie Hamilton and Potter, {Guy G.} and Manly, {Jennifer J.} and Romero, {Heather R.} and Mungas, {Dan M} and Gibbons, {Laura E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/gps.4121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "88--96",
journal = "International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "0885-6230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Demographic characteristics do not decrease the utility of depressive symptoms assessments

T2 - Examining the practical impact of item bias in four heterogeneous samples of older adults

AU - Dmitrieva, Natalia O.

AU - Fyffe, Denise

AU - Mukherjee, Shubhabrata

AU - Fieo, Robert

AU - Zahodne, Laura B.

AU - Hamilton, Jamie

AU - Potter, Guy G.

AU - Manly, Jennifer J.

AU - Romero, Heather R.

AU - Mungas, Dan M

AU - Gibbons, Laura E.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objective: Previous studies have identified differential item function (DIF) in depressive symptoms measures, but the impact of DIF has been rarely reported. Given the critical importance of depressive symptoms assessment among older adults, we examined whether DIF due to demographic characteristics resulted in salient score changes in commonly used measures. Methods: Four longitudinal studies of cognitive aging provided a sample size of 3754 older adults and included individuals both with and without a clinical diagnosis of major depression. Each study administered at least one of the following measures: the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (20-item ordinal response or 10-item dichotomous response versions), the Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Hybrid logistic regression-item response theory methods were used to examine the presence and impact of DIF due to age, sex, race/ethnicity, and years of education on the depressive symptoms items. Results: Although statistically significant DIF due to demographic factors was present on several items, its cumulative impact on depressive symptoms scores was practically negligible. Conclusions: The findings support substantive meaningfulness of previously reported demographic differences in depressive symptoms among older adults, showing that these individual differences were unlikely to have resulted from item bias attributable to demographic characteristics we examined.

AB - Objective: Previous studies have identified differential item function (DIF) in depressive symptoms measures, but the impact of DIF has been rarely reported. Given the critical importance of depressive symptoms assessment among older adults, we examined whether DIF due to demographic characteristics resulted in salient score changes in commonly used measures. Methods: Four longitudinal studies of cognitive aging provided a sample size of 3754 older adults and included individuals both with and without a clinical diagnosis of major depression. Each study administered at least one of the following measures: the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (20-item ordinal response or 10-item dichotomous response versions), the Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Hybrid logistic regression-item response theory methods were used to examine the presence and impact of DIF due to age, sex, race/ethnicity, and years of education on the depressive symptoms items. Results: Although statistically significant DIF due to demographic factors was present on several items, its cumulative impact on depressive symptoms scores was practically negligible. Conclusions: The findings support substantive meaningfulness of previously reported demographic differences in depressive symptoms among older adults, showing that these individual differences were unlikely to have resulted from item bias attributable to demographic characteristics we examined.

KW - CES-D

KW - Depressive symptoms

KW - Differential item function

KW - GDS

KW - Item bias

KW - MADRS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918769231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918769231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/gps.4121

DO - 10.1002/gps.4121

M3 - Article

C2 - 24737612

AN - SCOPUS:84918769231

VL - 30

SP - 88

EP - 96

JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 0885-6230

IS - 1

ER -