DCas9-based epigenome editing suggests acquisition of histone methylation is not sufficient for target gene repression

Henriette O'Geen, Chonghua Ren, Charles M. Nicolet, Andrew A. Perez, Julian Halmai, Victoria M. Le, Joel P. MacKay, Peggy J. Farnham, David Segal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Distinct epigenomic profiles of histone marks have been associated with gene expression, but questions regarding the causal relationship remain. Here we investigated the activity of a broad collection of genomically targeted epigenetic regulators that could write epigenetic marks associated with a repressed chromatin state (G9A, SUV39H1, Krüppel-associated box (KRAB), DNMT3A as well as the first targetable versions of Ezh2 and Friend of GATA-1 (FOG1)). dCas9 fusions produced target gene repression over a range of 0- to 10-fold that varied by locus and cell type. dCpf1 fusions were unable to repress gene expression. The most persistent gene repression required the action of several effector domains; however, KRAB-dCas9 did not contribute to persistence in contrast to previous reports. A 'direct tethering' strategy attaching the Ezh2 methyltransferase enzyme to dCas9, as well as a 'recruitment' strategy attaching the N-terminal 45 residues of FOG1 to dCas9 to recruit the endogenous nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex, were both successful in targeted deposition of H3K27me3. Surprisingly, however, repression was not correlated with deposition of either H3K9me3 or H3K27me3. Our results suggest that so-called repressive histone modifications are not sufficient for gene repression. The easily programmable dCas9 toolkit allowed precise control of epigenetic information and dissection of the relationship between the epigenome and gene regulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9901-9916
Number of pages16
JournalNucleic Acids Research
Volume45
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Epigenomics
Histones
Methylation
Histone Code
Genes
Mi-2 Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase Complex
Gene Expression
Methyltransferases
Chromatin
Dissection
Enzymes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics

Cite this

DCas9-based epigenome editing suggests acquisition of histone methylation is not sufficient for target gene repression. / O'Geen, Henriette; Ren, Chonghua; Nicolet, Charles M.; Perez, Andrew A.; Halmai, Julian; Le, Victoria M.; MacKay, Joel P.; Farnham, Peggy J.; Segal, David.

In: Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 45, No. 17, 01.09.2017, p. 9901-9916.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Geen, H, Ren, C, Nicolet, CM, Perez, AA, Halmai, J, Le, VM, MacKay, JP, Farnham, PJ & Segal, D 2017, 'DCas9-based epigenome editing suggests acquisition of histone methylation is not sufficient for target gene repression', Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 45, no. 17, pp. 9901-9916. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx578
O'Geen, Henriette ; Ren, Chonghua ; Nicolet, Charles M. ; Perez, Andrew A. ; Halmai, Julian ; Le, Victoria M. ; MacKay, Joel P. ; Farnham, Peggy J. ; Segal, David. / DCas9-based epigenome editing suggests acquisition of histone methylation is not sufficient for target gene repression. In: Nucleic Acids Research. 2017 ; Vol. 45, No. 17. pp. 9901-9916.
@article{244d2ed65c1e4114b9bf2b955a847744,
title = "DCas9-based epigenome editing suggests acquisition of histone methylation is not sufficient for target gene repression",
abstract = "Distinct epigenomic profiles of histone marks have been associated with gene expression, but questions regarding the causal relationship remain. Here we investigated the activity of a broad collection of genomically targeted epigenetic regulators that could write epigenetic marks associated with a repressed chromatin state (G9A, SUV39H1, Kr{\"u}ppel-associated box (KRAB), DNMT3A as well as the first targetable versions of Ezh2 and Friend of GATA-1 (FOG1)). dCas9 fusions produced target gene repression over a range of 0- to 10-fold that varied by locus and cell type. dCpf1 fusions were unable to repress gene expression. The most persistent gene repression required the action of several effector domains; however, KRAB-dCas9 did not contribute to persistence in contrast to previous reports. A 'direct tethering' strategy attaching the Ezh2 methyltransferase enzyme to dCas9, as well as a 'recruitment' strategy attaching the N-terminal 45 residues of FOG1 to dCas9 to recruit the endogenous nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex, were both successful in targeted deposition of H3K27me3. Surprisingly, however, repression was not correlated with deposition of either H3K9me3 or H3K27me3. Our results suggest that so-called repressive histone modifications are not sufficient for gene repression. The easily programmable dCas9 toolkit allowed precise control of epigenetic information and dissection of the relationship between the epigenome and gene regulation.",
author = "Henriette O'Geen and Chonghua Ren and Nicolet, {Charles M.} and Perez, {Andrew A.} and Julian Halmai and Le, {Victoria M.} and MacKay, {Joel P.} and Farnham, {Peggy J.} and David Segal",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/nar/gkx578",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "9901--9916",
journal = "Nucleic Acids Research",
issn = "0305-1048",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - DCas9-based epigenome editing suggests acquisition of histone methylation is not sufficient for target gene repression

AU - O'Geen, Henriette

AU - Ren, Chonghua

AU - Nicolet, Charles M.

AU - Perez, Andrew A.

AU - Halmai, Julian

AU - Le, Victoria M.

AU - MacKay, Joel P.

AU - Farnham, Peggy J.

AU - Segal, David

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Distinct epigenomic profiles of histone marks have been associated with gene expression, but questions regarding the causal relationship remain. Here we investigated the activity of a broad collection of genomically targeted epigenetic regulators that could write epigenetic marks associated with a repressed chromatin state (G9A, SUV39H1, Krüppel-associated box (KRAB), DNMT3A as well as the first targetable versions of Ezh2 and Friend of GATA-1 (FOG1)). dCas9 fusions produced target gene repression over a range of 0- to 10-fold that varied by locus and cell type. dCpf1 fusions were unable to repress gene expression. The most persistent gene repression required the action of several effector domains; however, KRAB-dCas9 did not contribute to persistence in contrast to previous reports. A 'direct tethering' strategy attaching the Ezh2 methyltransferase enzyme to dCas9, as well as a 'recruitment' strategy attaching the N-terminal 45 residues of FOG1 to dCas9 to recruit the endogenous nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex, were both successful in targeted deposition of H3K27me3. Surprisingly, however, repression was not correlated with deposition of either H3K9me3 or H3K27me3. Our results suggest that so-called repressive histone modifications are not sufficient for gene repression. The easily programmable dCas9 toolkit allowed precise control of epigenetic information and dissection of the relationship between the epigenome and gene regulation.

AB - Distinct epigenomic profiles of histone marks have been associated with gene expression, but questions regarding the causal relationship remain. Here we investigated the activity of a broad collection of genomically targeted epigenetic regulators that could write epigenetic marks associated with a repressed chromatin state (G9A, SUV39H1, Krüppel-associated box (KRAB), DNMT3A as well as the first targetable versions of Ezh2 and Friend of GATA-1 (FOG1)). dCas9 fusions produced target gene repression over a range of 0- to 10-fold that varied by locus and cell type. dCpf1 fusions were unable to repress gene expression. The most persistent gene repression required the action of several effector domains; however, KRAB-dCas9 did not contribute to persistence in contrast to previous reports. A 'direct tethering' strategy attaching the Ezh2 methyltransferase enzyme to dCas9, as well as a 'recruitment' strategy attaching the N-terminal 45 residues of FOG1 to dCas9 to recruit the endogenous nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex, were both successful in targeted deposition of H3K27me3. Surprisingly, however, repression was not correlated with deposition of either H3K9me3 or H3K27me3. Our results suggest that so-called repressive histone modifications are not sufficient for gene repression. The easily programmable dCas9 toolkit allowed precise control of epigenetic information and dissection of the relationship between the epigenome and gene regulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031674981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031674981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/nar/gkx578

DO - 10.1093/nar/gkx578

M3 - Article

C2 - 28973434

AN - SCOPUS:85031674981

VL - 45

SP - 9901

EP - 9916

JO - Nucleic Acids Research

JF - Nucleic Acids Research

SN - 0305-1048

IS - 17

ER -