Daily relative dog abundance, fecal density, and loading rates on intensively and minimally managed dog-friendly beaches in central California

Stori C. Oates, Melissa A. Miller, Dane Hardin, Clare Dominik, David Jessup, Woutrina A Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Due to increased concerns regarding fecal pollution at marine recreational beaches, daily relative dog abundance and fecal density were estimated on an intensively managed (Beach 1) and a minimally managed (Beach 2) dog beach in Monterey County, California. Fecal loading and factors predictive of fecal deposition also were assessed. After standardizing for beach area, daily beach use and fecal densities did not differ between beaches and yearly fecal loading estimates revealed that unrecovered dog feces likely contributes significantly to fecal contamination (1.4 and 0.2. metric. tonnes/beach). Detection of feces was significantly associated with beach management type, transect position relative to mean low tideline, presence of beach wrack, distance to the nearest beach entrance, and season. Methodologies outlined in this study can augment monitoring programs at coastal beaches to optimize management, assess visitor compliance, and improve coastal water quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMarine Pollution Bulletin
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Beaches
beaches
beach
dogs
feces
rate
dog
compliance
coastal water
Water quality
water quality
pollution
Pollution
Contamination
transect
monitoring

Keywords

  • Dog feces
  • Fecal density
  • Fecal loading
  • Non-point pollution sources
  • Recreational beach
  • Relative dog abundance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Pollution

Cite this

Daily relative dog abundance, fecal density, and loading rates on intensively and minimally managed dog-friendly beaches in central California. / Oates, Stori C.; Miller, Melissa A.; Hardin, Dane; Dominik, Clare; Jessup, David; Smith, Woutrina A.

In: Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b82e087900834257a5f7531f201c06f3,
title = "Daily relative dog abundance, fecal density, and loading rates on intensively and minimally managed dog-friendly beaches in central California",
abstract = "Due to increased concerns regarding fecal pollution at marine recreational beaches, daily relative dog abundance and fecal density were estimated on an intensively managed (Beach 1) and a minimally managed (Beach 2) dog beach in Monterey County, California. Fecal loading and factors predictive of fecal deposition also were assessed. After standardizing for beach area, daily beach use and fecal densities did not differ between beaches and yearly fecal loading estimates revealed that unrecovered dog feces likely contributes significantly to fecal contamination (1.4 and 0.2. metric. tonnes/beach). Detection of feces was significantly associated with beach management type, transect position relative to mean low tideline, presence of beach wrack, distance to the nearest beach entrance, and season. Methodologies outlined in this study can augment monitoring programs at coastal beaches to optimize management, assess visitor compliance, and improve coastal water quality.",
keywords = "Dog feces, Fecal density, Fecal loading, Non-point pollution sources, Recreational beach, Relative dog abundance",
author = "Oates, {Stori C.} and Miller, {Melissa A.} and Dane Hardin and Clare Dominik and David Jessup and Smith, {Woutrina A}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.062",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Marine Pollution Bulletin",
issn = "0025-326X",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Daily relative dog abundance, fecal density, and loading rates on intensively and minimally managed dog-friendly beaches in central California

AU - Oates, Stori C.

AU - Miller, Melissa A.

AU - Hardin, Dane

AU - Dominik, Clare

AU - Jessup, David

AU - Smith, Woutrina A

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Due to increased concerns regarding fecal pollution at marine recreational beaches, daily relative dog abundance and fecal density were estimated on an intensively managed (Beach 1) and a minimally managed (Beach 2) dog beach in Monterey County, California. Fecal loading and factors predictive of fecal deposition also were assessed. After standardizing for beach area, daily beach use and fecal densities did not differ between beaches and yearly fecal loading estimates revealed that unrecovered dog feces likely contributes significantly to fecal contamination (1.4 and 0.2. metric. tonnes/beach). Detection of feces was significantly associated with beach management type, transect position relative to mean low tideline, presence of beach wrack, distance to the nearest beach entrance, and season. Methodologies outlined in this study can augment monitoring programs at coastal beaches to optimize management, assess visitor compliance, and improve coastal water quality.

AB - Due to increased concerns regarding fecal pollution at marine recreational beaches, daily relative dog abundance and fecal density were estimated on an intensively managed (Beach 1) and a minimally managed (Beach 2) dog beach in Monterey County, California. Fecal loading and factors predictive of fecal deposition also were assessed. After standardizing for beach area, daily beach use and fecal densities did not differ between beaches and yearly fecal loading estimates revealed that unrecovered dog feces likely contributes significantly to fecal contamination (1.4 and 0.2. metric. tonnes/beach). Detection of feces was significantly associated with beach management type, transect position relative to mean low tideline, presence of beach wrack, distance to the nearest beach entrance, and season. Methodologies outlined in this study can augment monitoring programs at coastal beaches to optimize management, assess visitor compliance, and improve coastal water quality.

KW - Dog feces

KW - Fecal density

KW - Fecal loading

KW - Non-point pollution sources

KW - Recreational beach

KW - Relative dog abundance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033706765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033706765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.062

DO - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.062

M3 - Article

C2 - 29100633

AN - SCOPUS:85033706765

JO - Marine Pollution Bulletin

JF - Marine Pollution Bulletin

SN - 0025-326X

ER -