Cytomorphology of common malignant tumors of the breast

Lydia P Howell, Lynne Lin-Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In summary, a definitive cytologic diagnosis of breast cancer is usually possible when using the six major criteria of malignancy (cellularity, dyshesion, monomorphism, anisonucleosis, irregular nuclear membranes, prominent nucleoli) as part of the triple test. Carcinomas of special type have unique clinical and cytologic features that pathologists need to consider because these may confuse interpretation. Complete subtyping of carcinomas may not always be possible by FNA. Diagnostic accuracy for breast carcinoma is excellent. False-negative diagnoses are infrequent and chiefly caused by sampling issues. False-positive diagnoses are extremely rare. Uniform report terminology should be used to ensure that diagnostic information is conveyed appropriately and consistently to guide the next diagnostic or treatment step.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)733-760
Number of pages28
JournalClinics in Laboratory Medicine
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Tumors
Breast Neoplasms
Carcinoma
Nuclear Envelope
Terminology
Sampling
Membranes
Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Pathologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Cytomorphology of common malignant tumors of the breast. / Howell, Lydia P; Lin-Chang, Lynne.

In: Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 4, 12.2005, p. 733-760.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{134a68feebeb4ce39c974c452e341d79,
title = "Cytomorphology of common malignant tumors of the breast",
abstract = "In summary, a definitive cytologic diagnosis of breast cancer is usually possible when using the six major criteria of malignancy (cellularity, dyshesion, monomorphism, anisonucleosis, irregular nuclear membranes, prominent nucleoli) as part of the triple test. Carcinomas of special type have unique clinical and cytologic features that pathologists need to consider because these may confuse interpretation. Complete subtyping of carcinomas may not always be possible by FNA. Diagnostic accuracy for breast carcinoma is excellent. False-negative diagnoses are infrequent and chiefly caused by sampling issues. False-positive diagnoses are extremely rare. Uniform report terminology should be used to ensure that diagnostic information is conveyed appropriately and consistently to guide the next diagnostic or treatment step.",
author = "Howell, {Lydia P} and Lynne Lin-Chang",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.cll.2005.08.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "733--760",
journal = "Clinics in Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0272-2712",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cytomorphology of common malignant tumors of the breast

AU - Howell, Lydia P

AU - Lin-Chang, Lynne

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - In summary, a definitive cytologic diagnosis of breast cancer is usually possible when using the six major criteria of malignancy (cellularity, dyshesion, monomorphism, anisonucleosis, irregular nuclear membranes, prominent nucleoli) as part of the triple test. Carcinomas of special type have unique clinical and cytologic features that pathologists need to consider because these may confuse interpretation. Complete subtyping of carcinomas may not always be possible by FNA. Diagnostic accuracy for breast carcinoma is excellent. False-negative diagnoses are infrequent and chiefly caused by sampling issues. False-positive diagnoses are extremely rare. Uniform report terminology should be used to ensure that diagnostic information is conveyed appropriately and consistently to guide the next diagnostic or treatment step.

AB - In summary, a definitive cytologic diagnosis of breast cancer is usually possible when using the six major criteria of malignancy (cellularity, dyshesion, monomorphism, anisonucleosis, irregular nuclear membranes, prominent nucleoli) as part of the triple test. Carcinomas of special type have unique clinical and cytologic features that pathologists need to consider because these may confuse interpretation. Complete subtyping of carcinomas may not always be possible by FNA. Diagnostic accuracy for breast carcinoma is excellent. False-negative diagnoses are infrequent and chiefly caused by sampling issues. False-positive diagnoses are extremely rare. Uniform report terminology should be used to ensure that diagnostic information is conveyed appropriately and consistently to guide the next diagnostic or treatment step.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27944497391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27944497391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cll.2005.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.cll.2005.08.008

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 733

EP - 760

JO - Clinics in Laboratory Medicine

JF - Clinics in Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0272-2712

IS - 4

ER -