Current surgical management of liver tumors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is evident that liver resection by the general medical community for hepatic malignancies is being underutilized and that its curative potential is underestimated. Despite advancements in the critical care management and surgical techniques used with hepatic resection, the long-term survival after resection of primary and secondary liver malignancies remains poor. The results of resective treatment for hepatoma and metastatic colorectal cancer are discussed and recent results are compared with previously accepted norms and survival data. Careful selection and particular attention to the presence or absence of cirrhosis in guiding decisions regarding resection will lead to optimum results. Liver resection remains the fundamental choice for curative resection of most hepatic malignancies. However, the overall poor results provide a powerful clinical and biological argument for pursuing various regional and interstitial treatment alternatives to resection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-225
Number of pages9
JournalSeminars in Interventional Radiology
Volume14
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Liver
Neoplasms
Critical Care
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Colorectal Neoplasms
Fibrosis
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Hepatoma
  • Liver metastasis
  • Resection
  • Treatment results

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Current surgical management of liver tumors. / Zulim, Rebecca A.; Goodnight Jr, James E; Schneider, Philip D.

In: Seminars in Interventional Radiology, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1997, p. 217-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{22747f32cf764bbe879893ac95512957,
title = "Current surgical management of liver tumors",
abstract = "It is evident that liver resection by the general medical community for hepatic malignancies is being underutilized and that its curative potential is underestimated. Despite advancements in the critical care management and surgical techniques used with hepatic resection, the long-term survival after resection of primary and secondary liver malignancies remains poor. The results of resective treatment for hepatoma and metastatic colorectal cancer are discussed and recent results are compared with previously accepted norms and survival data. Careful selection and particular attention to the presence or absence of cirrhosis in guiding decisions regarding resection will lead to optimum results. Liver resection remains the fundamental choice for curative resection of most hepatic malignancies. However, the overall poor results provide a powerful clinical and biological argument for pursuing various regional and interstitial treatment alternatives to resection.",
keywords = "Hepatoma, Liver metastasis, Resection, Treatment results",
author = "Zulim, {Rebecca A.} and {Goodnight Jr}, {James E} and Schneider, {Philip D}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "217--225",
journal = "Seminars in Interventional Radiology",
issn = "0739-9529",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current surgical management of liver tumors

AU - Zulim, Rebecca A.

AU - Goodnight Jr, James E

AU - Schneider, Philip D

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - It is evident that liver resection by the general medical community for hepatic malignancies is being underutilized and that its curative potential is underestimated. Despite advancements in the critical care management and surgical techniques used with hepatic resection, the long-term survival after resection of primary and secondary liver malignancies remains poor. The results of resective treatment for hepatoma and metastatic colorectal cancer are discussed and recent results are compared with previously accepted norms and survival data. Careful selection and particular attention to the presence or absence of cirrhosis in guiding decisions regarding resection will lead to optimum results. Liver resection remains the fundamental choice for curative resection of most hepatic malignancies. However, the overall poor results provide a powerful clinical and biological argument for pursuing various regional and interstitial treatment alternatives to resection.

AB - It is evident that liver resection by the general medical community for hepatic malignancies is being underutilized and that its curative potential is underestimated. Despite advancements in the critical care management and surgical techniques used with hepatic resection, the long-term survival after resection of primary and secondary liver malignancies remains poor. The results of resective treatment for hepatoma and metastatic colorectal cancer are discussed and recent results are compared with previously accepted norms and survival data. Careful selection and particular attention to the presence or absence of cirrhosis in guiding decisions regarding resection will lead to optimum results. Liver resection remains the fundamental choice for curative resection of most hepatic malignancies. However, the overall poor results provide a powerful clinical and biological argument for pursuing various regional and interstitial treatment alternatives to resection.

KW - Hepatoma

KW - Liver metastasis

KW - Resection

KW - Treatment results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030866467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030866467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030866467

VL - 14

SP - 217

EP - 225

JO - Seminars in Interventional Radiology

JF - Seminars in Interventional Radiology

SN - 0739-9529

IS - 3

ER -