Current legal status of advance directives in the United States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advance directive legislation has been in place throughout much of the United States for nearly 3 decades. The right to give an informed consent to or refusal of medical treatment has been recognized by state and federal courts, and that right has been determined to survive the loss of decisional capacity and may be exercised through the execution of instructional or proxy directives. Despite these developments, the percentage of the adult population with a formal advance directive of any type has never exceeded 15%. Moreover, a remarkable number of these directives are ambiguous and/or their existence is unknown to the physicians who are expected to rely upon them. Even unambiguous directives may not be followed at the critical stage in the trajectory of a patient's illness, and the accountability for such disregard by health care institutions or professionals is negligible to nonexistent. Nevertheless, there is real potential for advance directives, as a key element to sound advance care planning, to fulfill their initial promise as instruments of the prospective autonomy of patients. In order for that potential to be realized, primary care physicians must embrace advance care planning as a part of their professional responsibility to patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)420-426
Number of pages7
JournalWiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Volume116
Issue number13
StatePublished - Jul 15 2004

Fingerprint

Advance Directives
Jurisprudence
Advance Care Planning
Treatment Refusal
Social Responsibility
Primary Care Physicians
Proxy
Informed Consent
Legislation
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Population

Keywords

  • Advance directive
  • Individual autonomy
  • Informed consent
  • Personal identity
  • Substituted judgment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Current legal status of advance directives in the United States. / Rich, Ben A.

In: Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, Vol. 116, No. 13, 15.07.2004, p. 420-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6069e0c7a1224c6ab490f82fb372a4eb,
title = "Current legal status of advance directives in the United States",
abstract = "Advance directive legislation has been in place throughout much of the United States for nearly 3 decades. The right to give an informed consent to or refusal of medical treatment has been recognized by state and federal courts, and that right has been determined to survive the loss of decisional capacity and may be exercised through the execution of instructional or proxy directives. Despite these developments, the percentage of the adult population with a formal advance directive of any type has never exceeded 15{\%}. Moreover, a remarkable number of these directives are ambiguous and/or their existence is unknown to the physicians who are expected to rely upon them. Even unambiguous directives may not be followed at the critical stage in the trajectory of a patient's illness, and the accountability for such disregard by health care institutions or professionals is negligible to nonexistent. Nevertheless, there is real potential for advance directives, as a key element to sound advance care planning, to fulfill their initial promise as instruments of the prospective autonomy of patients. In order for that potential to be realized, primary care physicians must embrace advance care planning as a part of their professional responsibility to patients.",
keywords = "Advance directive, Individual autonomy, Informed consent, Personal identity, Substituted judgment",
author = "Rich, {Ben A}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "420--426",
journal = "Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift",
issn = "0043-5325",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current legal status of advance directives in the United States

AU - Rich, Ben A

PY - 2004/7/15

Y1 - 2004/7/15

N2 - Advance directive legislation has been in place throughout much of the United States for nearly 3 decades. The right to give an informed consent to or refusal of medical treatment has been recognized by state and federal courts, and that right has been determined to survive the loss of decisional capacity and may be exercised through the execution of instructional or proxy directives. Despite these developments, the percentage of the adult population with a formal advance directive of any type has never exceeded 15%. Moreover, a remarkable number of these directives are ambiguous and/or their existence is unknown to the physicians who are expected to rely upon them. Even unambiguous directives may not be followed at the critical stage in the trajectory of a patient's illness, and the accountability for such disregard by health care institutions or professionals is negligible to nonexistent. Nevertheless, there is real potential for advance directives, as a key element to sound advance care planning, to fulfill their initial promise as instruments of the prospective autonomy of patients. In order for that potential to be realized, primary care physicians must embrace advance care planning as a part of their professional responsibility to patients.

AB - Advance directive legislation has been in place throughout much of the United States for nearly 3 decades. The right to give an informed consent to or refusal of medical treatment has been recognized by state and federal courts, and that right has been determined to survive the loss of decisional capacity and may be exercised through the execution of instructional or proxy directives. Despite these developments, the percentage of the adult population with a formal advance directive of any type has never exceeded 15%. Moreover, a remarkable number of these directives are ambiguous and/or their existence is unknown to the physicians who are expected to rely upon them. Even unambiguous directives may not be followed at the critical stage in the trajectory of a patient's illness, and the accountability for such disregard by health care institutions or professionals is negligible to nonexistent. Nevertheless, there is real potential for advance directives, as a key element to sound advance care planning, to fulfill their initial promise as instruments of the prospective autonomy of patients. In order for that potential to be realized, primary care physicians must embrace advance care planning as a part of their professional responsibility to patients.

KW - Advance directive

KW - Individual autonomy

KW - Informed consent

KW - Personal identity

KW - Substituted judgment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344710402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344710402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15344340

AN - SCOPUS:4344710402

VL - 116

SP - 420

EP - 426

JO - Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift

JF - Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift

SN - 0043-5325

IS - 13

ER -