Cross-comparison of protein recognition of sialic acid diversity on two novel sialoglycan microarrays

Vered Padler-Karavani, Xuezheng Song, Hai Yu, Nancy Hurtado-Ziola, Shengshu Huang, Saddam Muthana, Harshal A. Chokhawala, Jiansong Cheng, Andrea Verhagen, Martijn A. Langereis, Ralf Kleene, Melitta Schachner, Raoul J. De Groot, Yi Lasanajak, Haruo Matsuda, Richard Schwab, Xi Chen, David F. Smith, Richard D. Cummings, Ajit Varki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

DNA and protein arrays are commonly accepted as powerful exploratory tools in research. This has mainly been achieved by the establishment of proper guidelines for quality control, allowing cross-comparison between different array platforms. As a natural extension, glycan microarrays were subsequently developed, and recent advances using such arrays have greatly enhanced our understanding of protein-glycan recognition in nature. However, although it is assumed that biologically significant protein-glycan binding is robustly detected by glycan microarrays, there are wide variations in the methods used to produce, present, couple, and detect glycans, and systematic cross-comparisons are lacking.Weaddress these issues by comparing two arrays that together represent the marked diversity of sialic acid modifications, linkages, and underlying glycans in nature, including some identical motifs. We compare and contrast binding interactions with various known and novel plant, vertebrate, and viral sialic acid-recognizing proteins and present a technical advance for assessing specificity using mild periodate oxidation of the sialic acid chain. These data demonstrate both the diversity of sialic acids and the analytical power of glycan arrays, showing that different presentations in different formats provide useful and complementary interpretations of glycan-binding protein specificity. They also highlight important challenges and questions for the future of glycan array technology and suggest that glycan arrays with similar glycan structures cannot be simply assumed to give similar results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22593-22608
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Biological Chemistry
Volume287
Issue number27
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 29 2012

Fingerprint

N-Acetylneuraminic Acid
Microarrays
Polysaccharides
Proteins
Sialic Acids
Protein Array Analysis
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Protein Binding
Quality Control
Quality control
Vertebrates
Carrier Proteins
Guidelines
Technology
Oxidation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Padler-Karavani, V., Song, X., Yu, H., Hurtado-Ziola, N., Huang, S., Muthana, S., ... Varki, A. (2012). Cross-comparison of protein recognition of sialic acid diversity on two novel sialoglycan microarrays. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(27), 22593-22608. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.359323

Cross-comparison of protein recognition of sialic acid diversity on two novel sialoglycan microarrays. / Padler-Karavani, Vered; Song, Xuezheng; Yu, Hai; Hurtado-Ziola, Nancy; Huang, Shengshu; Muthana, Saddam; Chokhawala, Harshal A.; Cheng, Jiansong; Verhagen, Andrea; Langereis, Martijn A.; Kleene, Ralf; Schachner, Melitta; De Groot, Raoul J.; Lasanajak, Yi; Matsuda, Haruo; Schwab, Richard; Chen, Xi; Smith, David F.; Cummings, Richard D.; Varki, Ajit.

In: Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 287, No. 27, 29.06.2012, p. 22593-22608.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Padler-Karavani, V, Song, X, Yu, H, Hurtado-Ziola, N, Huang, S, Muthana, S, Chokhawala, HA, Cheng, J, Verhagen, A, Langereis, MA, Kleene, R, Schachner, M, De Groot, RJ, Lasanajak, Y, Matsuda, H, Schwab, R, Chen, X, Smith, DF, Cummings, RD & Varki, A 2012, 'Cross-comparison of protein recognition of sialic acid diversity on two novel sialoglycan microarrays', Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 27, pp. 22593-22608. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.359323
Padler-Karavani, Vered ; Song, Xuezheng ; Yu, Hai ; Hurtado-Ziola, Nancy ; Huang, Shengshu ; Muthana, Saddam ; Chokhawala, Harshal A. ; Cheng, Jiansong ; Verhagen, Andrea ; Langereis, Martijn A. ; Kleene, Ralf ; Schachner, Melitta ; De Groot, Raoul J. ; Lasanajak, Yi ; Matsuda, Haruo ; Schwab, Richard ; Chen, Xi ; Smith, David F. ; Cummings, Richard D. ; Varki, Ajit. / Cross-comparison of protein recognition of sialic acid diversity on two novel sialoglycan microarrays. In: Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012 ; Vol. 287, No. 27. pp. 22593-22608.
@article{6c047fc8ba16442993e46eba9340a1a9,
title = "Cross-comparison of protein recognition of sialic acid diversity on two novel sialoglycan microarrays",
abstract = "DNA and protein arrays are commonly accepted as powerful exploratory tools in research. This has mainly been achieved by the establishment of proper guidelines for quality control, allowing cross-comparison between different array platforms. As a natural extension, glycan microarrays were subsequently developed, and recent advances using such arrays have greatly enhanced our understanding of protein-glycan recognition in nature. However, although it is assumed that biologically significant protein-glycan binding is robustly detected by glycan microarrays, there are wide variations in the methods used to produce, present, couple, and detect glycans, and systematic cross-comparisons are lacking.Weaddress these issues by comparing two arrays that together represent the marked diversity of sialic acid modifications, linkages, and underlying glycans in nature, including some identical motifs. We compare and contrast binding interactions with various known and novel plant, vertebrate, and viral sialic acid-recognizing proteins and present a technical advance for assessing specificity using mild periodate oxidation of the sialic acid chain. These data demonstrate both the diversity of sialic acids and the analytical power of glycan arrays, showing that different presentations in different formats provide useful and complementary interpretations of glycan-binding protein specificity. They also highlight important challenges and questions for the future of glycan array technology and suggest that glycan arrays with similar glycan structures cannot be simply assumed to give similar results.",
author = "Vered Padler-Karavani and Xuezheng Song and Hai Yu and Nancy Hurtado-Ziola and Shengshu Huang and Saddam Muthana and Chokhawala, {Harshal A.} and Jiansong Cheng and Andrea Verhagen and Langereis, {Martijn A.} and Ralf Kleene and Melitta Schachner and {De Groot}, {Raoul J.} and Yi Lasanajak and Haruo Matsuda and Richard Schwab and Xi Chen and Smith, {David F.} and Cummings, {Richard D.} and Ajit Varki",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1074/jbc.M112.359323",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "287",
pages = "22593--22608",
journal = "Journal of Biological Chemistry",
issn = "0021-9258",
publisher = "American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Inc.",
number = "27",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-comparison of protein recognition of sialic acid diversity on two novel sialoglycan microarrays

AU - Padler-Karavani, Vered

AU - Song, Xuezheng

AU - Yu, Hai

AU - Hurtado-Ziola, Nancy

AU - Huang, Shengshu

AU - Muthana, Saddam

AU - Chokhawala, Harshal A.

AU - Cheng, Jiansong

AU - Verhagen, Andrea

AU - Langereis, Martijn A.

AU - Kleene, Ralf

AU - Schachner, Melitta

AU - De Groot, Raoul J.

AU - Lasanajak, Yi

AU - Matsuda, Haruo

AU - Schwab, Richard

AU - Chen, Xi

AU - Smith, David F.

AU - Cummings, Richard D.

AU - Varki, Ajit

PY - 2012/6/29

Y1 - 2012/6/29

N2 - DNA and protein arrays are commonly accepted as powerful exploratory tools in research. This has mainly been achieved by the establishment of proper guidelines for quality control, allowing cross-comparison between different array platforms. As a natural extension, glycan microarrays were subsequently developed, and recent advances using such arrays have greatly enhanced our understanding of protein-glycan recognition in nature. However, although it is assumed that biologically significant protein-glycan binding is robustly detected by glycan microarrays, there are wide variations in the methods used to produce, present, couple, and detect glycans, and systematic cross-comparisons are lacking.Weaddress these issues by comparing two arrays that together represent the marked diversity of sialic acid modifications, linkages, and underlying glycans in nature, including some identical motifs. We compare and contrast binding interactions with various known and novel plant, vertebrate, and viral sialic acid-recognizing proteins and present a technical advance for assessing specificity using mild periodate oxidation of the sialic acid chain. These data demonstrate both the diversity of sialic acids and the analytical power of glycan arrays, showing that different presentations in different formats provide useful and complementary interpretations of glycan-binding protein specificity. They also highlight important challenges and questions for the future of glycan array technology and suggest that glycan arrays with similar glycan structures cannot be simply assumed to give similar results.

AB - DNA and protein arrays are commonly accepted as powerful exploratory tools in research. This has mainly been achieved by the establishment of proper guidelines for quality control, allowing cross-comparison between different array platforms. As a natural extension, glycan microarrays were subsequently developed, and recent advances using such arrays have greatly enhanced our understanding of protein-glycan recognition in nature. However, although it is assumed that biologically significant protein-glycan binding is robustly detected by glycan microarrays, there are wide variations in the methods used to produce, present, couple, and detect glycans, and systematic cross-comparisons are lacking.Weaddress these issues by comparing two arrays that together represent the marked diversity of sialic acid modifications, linkages, and underlying glycans in nature, including some identical motifs. We compare and contrast binding interactions with various known and novel plant, vertebrate, and viral sialic acid-recognizing proteins and present a technical advance for assessing specificity using mild periodate oxidation of the sialic acid chain. These data demonstrate both the diversity of sialic acids and the analytical power of glycan arrays, showing that different presentations in different formats provide useful and complementary interpretations of glycan-binding protein specificity. They also highlight important challenges and questions for the future of glycan array technology and suggest that glycan arrays with similar glycan structures cannot be simply assumed to give similar results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863321795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863321795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1074/jbc.M112.359323

DO - 10.1074/jbc.M112.359323

M3 - Article

C2 - 22549775

AN - SCOPUS:84863321795

VL - 287

SP - 22593

EP - 22608

JO - Journal of Biological Chemistry

JF - Journal of Biological Chemistry

SN - 0021-9258

IS - 27

ER -