Coyote movements and social structure along a cryptic population genetic subdivision

Benjamin Sacks, Brian R. Mitchell, Christen L. Williams, Holly B Ernest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent region-wide study determined that the central California coyote (Canis latrans) population was genetically subdivided according to habitat bioregions, supporting the hypothesis that coyotes exhibit a dispersal bias toward their natal habitat type. Here, we further investigated this hypothesis using radio-collared coyotes captured on a 150-km 2 study site on the border of (i.e. overlapping) two bioregions (Great Valley and Cascade Mountains). As predicted, most coyotes were assigned (based on a priori genetic criteria) to genetic clusters corresponding to one of these two bioregions. All of those assigned to the Great Valley genetic cluster were caught in (and for the most part, remained in) the Great Valley bioregion. However, contrary to expectations, the coyotes assigned to the Cascades genetic cluster occurred commonly in both bioregions. Nearly all resident individuals on the study site, regardless of the particular bioregion, were assigned to the Cascades genetic cluster, whereas a sizable fraction of nonresident (transient or dispersing) coyotes caught in the Great Valley bioregion were assigned to the Great Valley cluster. Even among resident coyotes, interrelatedness of packs was greater within than between bioregions, and packs with territories overlapping both bioregions were more closely related to those with territories completely within the Cascades bioregion than territories completely within the Great Valley bioregion. Finally, direct estimates indicated that gene flow was twice as high from the Cascades bioregion to the Great Valley bioregion than in the reverse direction. Collectively, these findings reveal the anatomy of the genetic subdivision as beginning abruptly at the bioregion boundary and ending diffusely within the Great Valley bioregion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1241-1249
Number of pages9
JournalMolecular Ecology
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

Coyotes
Canis latrans
Population Genetics
social structure
population genetics
Cascade Mountain region
valleys
Genes
valley
Ecosystem
Gene Flow
Direction compound
habitats
Radio
habitat type
anatomy
radio
gene flow
Anatomy

Keywords

  • Canis latrans
  • Coyote
  • Dispersal
  • Gene flow
  • Habitat
  • Microsatellites

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Coyote movements and social structure along a cryptic population genetic subdivision. / Sacks, Benjamin; Mitchell, Brian R.; Williams, Christen L.; Ernest, Holly B.

In: Molecular Ecology, Vol. 14, No. 4, 04.2005, p. 1241-1249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sacks, Benjamin ; Mitchell, Brian R. ; Williams, Christen L. ; Ernest, Holly B. / Coyote movements and social structure along a cryptic population genetic subdivision. In: Molecular Ecology. 2005 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 1241-1249.
@article{ef1fe994c17c456ba15f6503b7acff8a,
title = "Coyote movements and social structure along a cryptic population genetic subdivision",
abstract = "A recent region-wide study determined that the central California coyote (Canis latrans) population was genetically subdivided according to habitat bioregions, supporting the hypothesis that coyotes exhibit a dispersal bias toward their natal habitat type. Here, we further investigated this hypothesis using radio-collared coyotes captured on a 150-km 2 study site on the border of (i.e. overlapping) two bioregions (Great Valley and Cascade Mountains). As predicted, most coyotes were assigned (based on a priori genetic criteria) to genetic clusters corresponding to one of these two bioregions. All of those assigned to the Great Valley genetic cluster were caught in (and for the most part, remained in) the Great Valley bioregion. However, contrary to expectations, the coyotes assigned to the Cascades genetic cluster occurred commonly in both bioregions. Nearly all resident individuals on the study site, regardless of the particular bioregion, were assigned to the Cascades genetic cluster, whereas a sizable fraction of nonresident (transient or dispersing) coyotes caught in the Great Valley bioregion were assigned to the Great Valley cluster. Even among resident coyotes, interrelatedness of packs was greater within than between bioregions, and packs with territories overlapping both bioregions were more closely related to those with territories completely within the Cascades bioregion than territories completely within the Great Valley bioregion. Finally, direct estimates indicated that gene flow was twice as high from the Cascades bioregion to the Great Valley bioregion than in the reverse direction. Collectively, these findings reveal the anatomy of the genetic subdivision as beginning abruptly at the bioregion boundary and ending diffusely within the Great Valley bioregion.",
keywords = "Canis latrans, Coyote, Dispersal, Gene flow, Habitat, Microsatellites",
author = "Benjamin Sacks and Mitchell, {Brian R.} and Williams, {Christen L.} and Ernest, {Holly B}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02473.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1241--1249",
journal = "Molecular Ecology",
issn = "0962-1083",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coyote movements and social structure along a cryptic population genetic subdivision

AU - Sacks, Benjamin

AU - Mitchell, Brian R.

AU - Williams, Christen L.

AU - Ernest, Holly B

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - A recent region-wide study determined that the central California coyote (Canis latrans) population was genetically subdivided according to habitat bioregions, supporting the hypothesis that coyotes exhibit a dispersal bias toward their natal habitat type. Here, we further investigated this hypothesis using radio-collared coyotes captured on a 150-km 2 study site on the border of (i.e. overlapping) two bioregions (Great Valley and Cascade Mountains). As predicted, most coyotes were assigned (based on a priori genetic criteria) to genetic clusters corresponding to one of these two bioregions. All of those assigned to the Great Valley genetic cluster were caught in (and for the most part, remained in) the Great Valley bioregion. However, contrary to expectations, the coyotes assigned to the Cascades genetic cluster occurred commonly in both bioregions. Nearly all resident individuals on the study site, regardless of the particular bioregion, were assigned to the Cascades genetic cluster, whereas a sizable fraction of nonresident (transient or dispersing) coyotes caught in the Great Valley bioregion were assigned to the Great Valley cluster. Even among resident coyotes, interrelatedness of packs was greater within than between bioregions, and packs with territories overlapping both bioregions were more closely related to those with territories completely within the Cascades bioregion than territories completely within the Great Valley bioregion. Finally, direct estimates indicated that gene flow was twice as high from the Cascades bioregion to the Great Valley bioregion than in the reverse direction. Collectively, these findings reveal the anatomy of the genetic subdivision as beginning abruptly at the bioregion boundary and ending diffusely within the Great Valley bioregion.

AB - A recent region-wide study determined that the central California coyote (Canis latrans) population was genetically subdivided according to habitat bioregions, supporting the hypothesis that coyotes exhibit a dispersal bias toward their natal habitat type. Here, we further investigated this hypothesis using radio-collared coyotes captured on a 150-km 2 study site on the border of (i.e. overlapping) two bioregions (Great Valley and Cascade Mountains). As predicted, most coyotes were assigned (based on a priori genetic criteria) to genetic clusters corresponding to one of these two bioregions. All of those assigned to the Great Valley genetic cluster were caught in (and for the most part, remained in) the Great Valley bioregion. However, contrary to expectations, the coyotes assigned to the Cascades genetic cluster occurred commonly in both bioregions. Nearly all resident individuals on the study site, regardless of the particular bioregion, were assigned to the Cascades genetic cluster, whereas a sizable fraction of nonresident (transient or dispersing) coyotes caught in the Great Valley bioregion were assigned to the Great Valley cluster. Even among resident coyotes, interrelatedness of packs was greater within than between bioregions, and packs with territories overlapping both bioregions were more closely related to those with territories completely within the Cascades bioregion than territories completely within the Great Valley bioregion. Finally, direct estimates indicated that gene flow was twice as high from the Cascades bioregion to the Great Valley bioregion than in the reverse direction. Collectively, these findings reveal the anatomy of the genetic subdivision as beginning abruptly at the bioregion boundary and ending diffusely within the Great Valley bioregion.

KW - Canis latrans

KW - Coyote

KW - Dispersal

KW - Gene flow

KW - Habitat

KW - Microsatellites

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16344377355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16344377355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02473.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02473.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15773950

AN - SCOPUS:16344377355

VL - 14

SP - 1241

EP - 1249

JO - Molecular Ecology

JF - Molecular Ecology

SN - 0962-1083

IS - 4

ER -