Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention in older home care clients at risk for falling

Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Johnna Perdrizet, Maureen Markle-Reid, Jeffrey S Hoch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Falls among older adults can cause serious morbidity and pose economic burdens on society. Older age is a known risk factor for falls and age has been shown to influence the effectiveness of fall prevention programs. To our knowledge, no studies have explicitly investigated whether cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention (the intervention) is influenced by age. This economic evaluation explores: 1) the cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention compared to usual care for community-dwelling adults ≥ 75 years at risk of falling in Canada; and 2) the influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Methods: Net benefit regression was used to examine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention with willingness-to-pay values ranging from $0-$50,000. Effects were measured as change in the number of falls, from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Costs were measured using a societal perspective. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for both the total sample and by age subgroups (75-84 and 85+ years). Results: For the total sample, the intervention was not economically attractive. However, the intervention was cost-effective at higher willingness-to-pay (WTP) (≥ $25,000) for adults 75-84 years and at lower WTP (< $5,000) for adults 85+ years. Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of the intervention depends on age and decision makers' WTP to prevent falls. Understanding the influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of an intervention may help to target resources to those who benefit most. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00463658 (18 April 2007).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number199
JournalBMC Geriatrics
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Home Care Services
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Independent Living
Costs and Cost Analysis
Canada
Economics
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Age
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Fall prevention
  • Multifactorial intervention
  • Older adults

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention in older home care clients at risk for falling. / Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee; Perdrizet, Johnna; Markle-Reid, Maureen; Hoch, Jeffrey S.

In: BMC Geriatrics, Vol. 17, No. 1, 199, 01.09.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f0add41de2349e3b5d461a04093cc35,
title = "Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention in older home care clients at risk for falling",
abstract = "Background: Falls among older adults can cause serious morbidity and pose economic burdens on society. Older age is a known risk factor for falls and age has been shown to influence the effectiveness of fall prevention programs. To our knowledge, no studies have explicitly investigated whether cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention (the intervention) is influenced by age. This economic evaluation explores: 1) the cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention compared to usual care for community-dwelling adults ≥ 75 years at risk of falling in Canada; and 2) the influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Methods: Net benefit regression was used to examine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention with willingness-to-pay values ranging from $0-$50,000. Effects were measured as change in the number of falls, from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Costs were measured using a societal perspective. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for both the total sample and by age subgroups (75-84 and 85+ years). Results: For the total sample, the intervention was not economically attractive. However, the intervention was cost-effective at higher willingness-to-pay (WTP) (≥ $25,000) for adults 75-84 years and at lower WTP (< $5,000) for adults 85+ years. Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of the intervention depends on age and decision makers' WTP to prevent falls. Understanding the influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of an intervention may help to target resources to those who benefit most. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00463658 (18 April 2007).",
keywords = "Age, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Fall prevention, Multifactorial intervention, Older adults",
author = "Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai and Johnna Perdrizet and Maureen Markle-Reid and Hoch, {Jeffrey S}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s12877-017-0599-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "BMC Geriatrics",
issn = "1471-2318",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention in older home care clients at risk for falling

AU - Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee

AU - Perdrizet, Johnna

AU - Markle-Reid, Maureen

AU - Hoch, Jeffrey S

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Background: Falls among older adults can cause serious morbidity and pose economic burdens on society. Older age is a known risk factor for falls and age has been shown to influence the effectiveness of fall prevention programs. To our knowledge, no studies have explicitly investigated whether cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention (the intervention) is influenced by age. This economic evaluation explores: 1) the cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention compared to usual care for community-dwelling adults ≥ 75 years at risk of falling in Canada; and 2) the influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Methods: Net benefit regression was used to examine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention with willingness-to-pay values ranging from $0-$50,000. Effects were measured as change in the number of falls, from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Costs were measured using a societal perspective. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for both the total sample and by age subgroups (75-84 and 85+ years). Results: For the total sample, the intervention was not economically attractive. However, the intervention was cost-effective at higher willingness-to-pay (WTP) (≥ $25,000) for adults 75-84 years and at lower WTP (< $5,000) for adults 85+ years. Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of the intervention depends on age and decision makers' WTP to prevent falls. Understanding the influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of an intervention may help to target resources to those who benefit most. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00463658 (18 April 2007).

AB - Background: Falls among older adults can cause serious morbidity and pose economic burdens on society. Older age is a known risk factor for falls and age has been shown to influence the effectiveness of fall prevention programs. To our knowledge, no studies have explicitly investigated whether cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention (the intervention) is influenced by age. This economic evaluation explores: 1) the cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial fall prevention intervention compared to usual care for community-dwelling adults ≥ 75 years at risk of falling in Canada; and 2) the influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Methods: Net benefit regression was used to examine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention with willingness-to-pay values ranging from $0-$50,000. Effects were measured as change in the number of falls, from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Costs were measured using a societal perspective. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for both the total sample and by age subgroups (75-84 and 85+ years). Results: For the total sample, the intervention was not economically attractive. However, the intervention was cost-effective at higher willingness-to-pay (WTP) (≥ $25,000) for adults 75-84 years and at lower WTP (< $5,000) for adults 85+ years. Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness of the intervention depends on age and decision makers' WTP to prevent falls. Understanding the influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of an intervention may help to target resources to those who benefit most. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00463658 (18 April 2007).

KW - Age

KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis

KW - Fall prevention

KW - Multifactorial intervention

KW - Older adults

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028696026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028696026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12877-017-0599-9

DO - 10.1186/s12877-017-0599-9

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - BMC Geriatrics

JF - BMC Geriatrics

SN - 1471-2318

IS - 1

M1 - 199

ER -