Correction to: Multicenter comparison of three intraoperative hemoglobin trend monitoring methods (Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, (2019), 10.1007/s10877-019-00428-3)

Richard L. Applegate, Patricia Applegate, Maxime Cannesson, Prith Peiris, Beth L. Ladlie, Klaus Torp

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In the original publication of the article, the ABGHb graph of Fig. 2 was incorrectly rendered during conversion from black and white to color. The figure shows hemoglobin results from the 3 compared monitoring methods to results obtained by laboratory hematology analyzer. Importantly this illustration of secondary outcome was not used for statistical comparisons but is intended to show relative accuracy of the 3 monitoring methods. The corrected Fig. 2 is given in this erratum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Multicenter comparison of three intraoperative hemoglobin trend monitoring methods (Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, (2019), 10.1007/s10877-019-00428-3)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this