Consumers’ perceptions and choices related to three value-based insurance design approaches

Susan L. Perez, Melissa Gosdin, Jessie Kemmick Pintor, Patrick S. Romano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The burden of rising health care costs is being shifted to consumers, and 30 percent of health care costs are attributed to wasteful spending on low- or no-value services. Value-based insurance design (VBID) is intended to encourage the use of high-value services or discourage the use of low-value services by aligning cost with quality. During the summer and fall of 2016, this mixed-methods study used focus groups and a quantitative analysis of survey data to explore consumer decision making in Northern California. When presented with three common VBID approaches, the focus groups favored value-based benefit design the most (41 percent), followed by reference pricing (28 percent) and narrow networks (21 percent). When presented with VBID scenarios, participants were skeptical of the value-based trade-offs and reported seeking information they wanted instead of relying on information that health plans provide. Engaging consumers to successfully reduce waste through VBID will require clarifying trade-offs to support consumers’ processes for arriving at high-value decisions as well as reaching out to consumers through trusted sources and networks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)456-463
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
Health Care Costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Decision Making
Value-Based Insurance
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Consumers’ perceptions and choices related to three value-based insurance design approaches. / Perez, Susan L.; Gosdin, Melissa; Pintor, Jessie Kemmick; Romano, Patrick S.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 38, No. 3, 01.03.2019, p. 456-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perez, Susan L. ; Gosdin, Melissa ; Pintor, Jessie Kemmick ; Romano, Patrick S. / Consumers’ perceptions and choices related to three value-based insurance design approaches. In: Health Affairs. 2019 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 456-463.
@article{8c3ba0866d474098a1da3069ed312b2f,
title = "Consumers’ perceptions and choices related to three value-based insurance design approaches",
abstract = "The burden of rising health care costs is being shifted to consumers, and 30 percent of health care costs are attributed to wasteful spending on low- or no-value services. Value-based insurance design (VBID) is intended to encourage the use of high-value services or discourage the use of low-value services by aligning cost with quality. During the summer and fall of 2016, this mixed-methods study used focus groups and a quantitative analysis of survey data to explore consumer decision making in Northern California. When presented with three common VBID approaches, the focus groups favored value-based benefit design the most (41 percent), followed by reference pricing (28 percent) and narrow networks (21 percent). When presented with VBID scenarios, participants were skeptical of the value-based trade-offs and reported seeking information they wanted instead of relying on information that health plans provide. Engaging consumers to successfully reduce waste through VBID will require clarifying trade-offs to support consumers’ processes for arriving at high-value decisions as well as reaching out to consumers through trusted sources and networks.",
author = "Perez, {Susan L.} and Melissa Gosdin and Pintor, {Jessie Kemmick} and Romano, {Patrick S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "456--463",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumers’ perceptions and choices related to three value-based insurance design approaches

AU - Perez, Susan L.

AU - Gosdin, Melissa

AU - Pintor, Jessie Kemmick

AU - Romano, Patrick S.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - The burden of rising health care costs is being shifted to consumers, and 30 percent of health care costs are attributed to wasteful spending on low- or no-value services. Value-based insurance design (VBID) is intended to encourage the use of high-value services or discourage the use of low-value services by aligning cost with quality. During the summer and fall of 2016, this mixed-methods study used focus groups and a quantitative analysis of survey data to explore consumer decision making in Northern California. When presented with three common VBID approaches, the focus groups favored value-based benefit design the most (41 percent), followed by reference pricing (28 percent) and narrow networks (21 percent). When presented with VBID scenarios, participants were skeptical of the value-based trade-offs and reported seeking information they wanted instead of relying on information that health plans provide. Engaging consumers to successfully reduce waste through VBID will require clarifying trade-offs to support consumers’ processes for arriving at high-value decisions as well as reaching out to consumers through trusted sources and networks.

AB - The burden of rising health care costs is being shifted to consumers, and 30 percent of health care costs are attributed to wasteful spending on low- or no-value services. Value-based insurance design (VBID) is intended to encourage the use of high-value services or discourage the use of low-value services by aligning cost with quality. During the summer and fall of 2016, this mixed-methods study used focus groups and a quantitative analysis of survey data to explore consumer decision making in Northern California. When presented with three common VBID approaches, the focus groups favored value-based benefit design the most (41 percent), followed by reference pricing (28 percent) and narrow networks (21 percent). When presented with VBID scenarios, participants were skeptical of the value-based trade-offs and reported seeking information they wanted instead of relying on information that health plans provide. Engaging consumers to successfully reduce waste through VBID will require clarifying trade-offs to support consumers’ processes for arriving at high-value decisions as well as reaching out to consumers through trusted sources and networks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062419298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062419298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05048

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05048

M3 - Article

C2 - 30830829

AN - SCOPUS:85062419298

VL - 38

SP - 456

EP - 463

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 3

ER -