Conservative versus surgical treatment of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs

Amy Kapatkin, R. Howe-Smith, F. Shofer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures treated conservatively versus surgically. Internal fixation of these fractures is recommended if there are: more than two metacarpal or metatarsal fractures in the same leg; two fractures of weight bearing bones; articular fractures; fractures with significant displacement; open fractures; and if the fractures occur in large breed, athletic, show, or working dogs. All 25 dogs fit the published criteria for surgical fixation to achieve a good outcome. Treatment (surgical versus conservative) was assigned based on owners' decisions only. Follow-up was nine-68 months. Anything less than perfect in the categories used to evaluate outcome was considered a failure. Outcome was not statistically affected by surgery or conservative treatment, and no other factors significantly affected outcome. The present recommendations used in determining if surgery is necessary for these fractures were extrapolated from human literature and may have no scientific validity in our patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-127
Number of pages5
JournalVeterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Volume13
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

metacarpus
Metacarpal Bones
Metatarsal Bones
surgery
Dogs
fracture fixation
Internal Fracture Fixation
Open Fractures
dogs
Weight-Bearing
sports
retrospective studies
Sports
Leg
legs
Retrospective Studies
Joints
bones
breeds
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Canine
  • Metacarpal fractures
  • Metatarsal fractures
  • Treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Conservative versus surgical treatment of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs. / Kapatkin, Amy; Howe-Smith, R.; Shofer, F.

In: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2000, p. 123-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7e89cc2ec3547e0bcd4d028002e0cce,
title = "Conservative versus surgical treatment of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs",
abstract = "The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures treated conservatively versus surgically. Internal fixation of these fractures is recommended if there are: more than two metacarpal or metatarsal fractures in the same leg; two fractures of weight bearing bones; articular fractures; fractures with significant displacement; open fractures; and if the fractures occur in large breed, athletic, show, or working dogs. All 25 dogs fit the published criteria for surgical fixation to achieve a good outcome. Treatment (surgical versus conservative) was assigned based on owners' decisions only. Follow-up was nine-68 months. Anything less than perfect in the categories used to evaluate outcome was considered a failure. Outcome was not statistically affected by surgery or conservative treatment, and no other factors significantly affected outcome. The present recommendations used in determining if surgery is necessary for these fractures were extrapolated from human literature and may have no scientific validity in our patients.",
keywords = "Canine, Metacarpal fractures, Metatarsal fractures, Treatment outcome",
author = "Amy Kapatkin and R. Howe-Smith and F. Shofer",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "123--127",
journal = "Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology",
issn = "0932-0814",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservative versus surgical treatment of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs

AU - Kapatkin, Amy

AU - Howe-Smith, R.

AU - Shofer, F.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures treated conservatively versus surgically. Internal fixation of these fractures is recommended if there are: more than two metacarpal or metatarsal fractures in the same leg; two fractures of weight bearing bones; articular fractures; fractures with significant displacement; open fractures; and if the fractures occur in large breed, athletic, show, or working dogs. All 25 dogs fit the published criteria for surgical fixation to achieve a good outcome. Treatment (surgical versus conservative) was assigned based on owners' decisions only. Follow-up was nine-68 months. Anything less than perfect in the categories used to evaluate outcome was considered a failure. Outcome was not statistically affected by surgery or conservative treatment, and no other factors significantly affected outcome. The present recommendations used in determining if surgery is necessary for these fractures were extrapolated from human literature and may have no scientific validity in our patients.

AB - The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of metacarpal and metatarsal fractures treated conservatively versus surgically. Internal fixation of these fractures is recommended if there are: more than two metacarpal or metatarsal fractures in the same leg; two fractures of weight bearing bones; articular fractures; fractures with significant displacement; open fractures; and if the fractures occur in large breed, athletic, show, or working dogs. All 25 dogs fit the published criteria for surgical fixation to achieve a good outcome. Treatment (surgical versus conservative) was assigned based on owners' decisions only. Follow-up was nine-68 months. Anything less than perfect in the categories used to evaluate outcome was considered a failure. Outcome was not statistically affected by surgery or conservative treatment, and no other factors significantly affected outcome. The present recommendations used in determining if surgery is necessary for these fractures were extrapolated from human literature and may have no scientific validity in our patients.

KW - Canine

KW - Metacarpal fractures

KW - Metatarsal fractures

KW - Treatment outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23044518112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23044518112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:23044518112

VL - 13

SP - 123

EP - 127

JO - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

JF - Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

SN - 0932-0814

IS - 3

ER -