Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE)

Domain 2—Defining rational therapeutic usage

Robert Goggs, Lenore Bacek, Domenico Bianco, Amy Koenigshof, Ronald H L Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review available evidence to determine when small animals at risk of thrombosis should be treated with antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, which antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents are most effective, and when multimodal therapy is indicated. Design: Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence (LOE) and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor), and development of consensus on conclusions via a Delphi-style survey for application of the concepts to clinical practice. Draft recommendations were presented at 2 international veterinary conferences and made available for community assessment, review, and comment prior to final revisions and publication. Settings: Academic and referral veterinary medical centers. Results: Databases searched included Medline via PubMed and CAB abstracts. Twelve Population Intervention Comparison Outcome questions were devised and generated corresponding worksheets investigating indications for use of antithrombotic drugs in small animals. Seventy-eight studies were reviewed in detail. Most studies assessed were experimentally controlled laboratory studies in companion animals (56 LOE 3) with smaller numbers of LOE 2 (1), LOE 4 (5), LOE 5 (6), and LOE 6 (4) studies assessed. Only 5 randomized controlled clinical trials were identified (LOE 1, Good–Fair). The 12 worksheets generated 21 guidelines with 17 guideline statements that were refined during 3 rounds of Delphi surveys. A high degree of consensus was reached across all guideline recommendations during the Delphi process. Conclusions: Overall, systematic evidence evaluations generated 2 strong recommendations, 19 weak recommendations (formulated as suggestions), 9 situations where the evidence was insufficient to make strong recommendations, and 8 situations where no relevant evidence was retrieved to aid guideline generation. Numerous significant knowledge gaps were highlighted by the evidence reviews undertaken, indicating the need for substantial additional research in this field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-59
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Consensus
Guidelines
therapeutics
anticoagulants
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
Anticoagulants
randomized clinical trials
thrombosis
Pets
Therapeutics
PubMed
pets
Publications
animals
Thrombosis
Referral and Consultation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Databases
drugs

Keywords

  • anticoagulant
  • antiplatelet
  • cats
  • dogs
  • thromboprophylaxis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) : Domain 2—Defining rational therapeutic usage. / Goggs, Robert; Bacek, Lenore; Bianco, Domenico; Koenigshof, Amy; Li, Ronald H L.

In: Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 49-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f540bd45c8f4b49b928000b757db544,
title = "Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE): Domain 2—Defining rational therapeutic usage",
abstract = "Objectives: To systematically review available evidence to determine when small animals at risk of thrombosis should be treated with antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, which antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents are most effective, and when multimodal therapy is indicated. Design: Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence (LOE) and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor), and development of consensus on conclusions via a Delphi-style survey for application of the concepts to clinical practice. Draft recommendations were presented at 2 international veterinary conferences and made available for community assessment, review, and comment prior to final revisions and publication. Settings: Academic and referral veterinary medical centers. Results: Databases searched included Medline via PubMed and CAB abstracts. Twelve Population Intervention Comparison Outcome questions were devised and generated corresponding worksheets investigating indications for use of antithrombotic drugs in small animals. Seventy-eight studies were reviewed in detail. Most studies assessed were experimentally controlled laboratory studies in companion animals (56 LOE 3) with smaller numbers of LOE 2 (1), LOE 4 (5), LOE 5 (6), and LOE 6 (4) studies assessed. Only 5 randomized controlled clinical trials were identified (LOE 1, Good–Fair). The 12 worksheets generated 21 guidelines with 17 guideline statements that were refined during 3 rounds of Delphi surveys. A high degree of consensus was reached across all guideline recommendations during the Delphi process. Conclusions: Overall, systematic evidence evaluations generated 2 strong recommendations, 19 weak recommendations (formulated as suggestions), 9 situations where the evidence was insufficient to make strong recommendations, and 8 situations where no relevant evidence was retrieved to aid guideline generation. Numerous significant knowledge gaps were highlighted by the evidence reviews undertaken, indicating the need for substantial additional research in this field.",
keywords = "anticoagulant, antiplatelet, cats, dogs, thromboprophylaxis",
author = "Robert Goggs and Lenore Bacek and Domenico Bianco and Amy Koenigshof and Li, {Ronald H L}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/vec.12791",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "49--59",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care",
issn = "1479-3261",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE)

T2 - Domain 2—Defining rational therapeutic usage

AU - Goggs, Robert

AU - Bacek, Lenore

AU - Bianco, Domenico

AU - Koenigshof, Amy

AU - Li, Ronald H L

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objectives: To systematically review available evidence to determine when small animals at risk of thrombosis should be treated with antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, which antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents are most effective, and when multimodal therapy is indicated. Design: Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence (LOE) and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor), and development of consensus on conclusions via a Delphi-style survey for application of the concepts to clinical practice. Draft recommendations were presented at 2 international veterinary conferences and made available for community assessment, review, and comment prior to final revisions and publication. Settings: Academic and referral veterinary medical centers. Results: Databases searched included Medline via PubMed and CAB abstracts. Twelve Population Intervention Comparison Outcome questions were devised and generated corresponding worksheets investigating indications for use of antithrombotic drugs in small animals. Seventy-eight studies were reviewed in detail. Most studies assessed were experimentally controlled laboratory studies in companion animals (56 LOE 3) with smaller numbers of LOE 2 (1), LOE 4 (5), LOE 5 (6), and LOE 6 (4) studies assessed. Only 5 randomized controlled clinical trials were identified (LOE 1, Good–Fair). The 12 worksheets generated 21 guidelines with 17 guideline statements that were refined during 3 rounds of Delphi surveys. A high degree of consensus was reached across all guideline recommendations during the Delphi process. Conclusions: Overall, systematic evidence evaluations generated 2 strong recommendations, 19 weak recommendations (formulated as suggestions), 9 situations where the evidence was insufficient to make strong recommendations, and 8 situations where no relevant evidence was retrieved to aid guideline generation. Numerous significant knowledge gaps were highlighted by the evidence reviews undertaken, indicating the need for substantial additional research in this field.

AB - Objectives: To systematically review available evidence to determine when small animals at risk of thrombosis should be treated with antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, which antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents are most effective, and when multimodal therapy is indicated. Design: Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence (LOE) and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor), and development of consensus on conclusions via a Delphi-style survey for application of the concepts to clinical practice. Draft recommendations were presented at 2 international veterinary conferences and made available for community assessment, review, and comment prior to final revisions and publication. Settings: Academic and referral veterinary medical centers. Results: Databases searched included Medline via PubMed and CAB abstracts. Twelve Population Intervention Comparison Outcome questions were devised and generated corresponding worksheets investigating indications for use of antithrombotic drugs in small animals. Seventy-eight studies were reviewed in detail. Most studies assessed were experimentally controlled laboratory studies in companion animals (56 LOE 3) with smaller numbers of LOE 2 (1), LOE 4 (5), LOE 5 (6), and LOE 6 (4) studies assessed. Only 5 randomized controlled clinical trials were identified (LOE 1, Good–Fair). The 12 worksheets generated 21 guidelines with 17 guideline statements that were refined during 3 rounds of Delphi surveys. A high degree of consensus was reached across all guideline recommendations during the Delphi process. Conclusions: Overall, systematic evidence evaluations generated 2 strong recommendations, 19 weak recommendations (formulated as suggestions), 9 situations where the evidence was insufficient to make strong recommendations, and 8 situations where no relevant evidence was retrieved to aid guideline generation. Numerous significant knowledge gaps were highlighted by the evidence reviews undertaken, indicating the need for substantial additional research in this field.

KW - anticoagulant

KW - antiplatelet

KW - cats

KW - dogs

KW - thromboprophylaxis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060149306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060149306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/vec.12791

DO - 10.1111/vec.12791

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 49

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care

JF - Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care

SN - 1479-3261

IS - 1

ER -