Conflicts in wound classification of neonatal operations

Lan T. Vu, Kerilyn K. Nobuhara, Hanmin Lee, Diana L Farmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Purpose: This study sought to determine the reliability of wound classification guidelines when applied to neonatal operations. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional web-based survey of pediatric surgeons. From a random sample of 22 neonatal operations, participants classified each operation as "clean," "clean-contaminated," "contaminated," or "dirty or infected," and specified duration of perioperative antibiotics as "none," "single preoperative," "24 hours," or ">24 hours." Unweighted κ score was calculated to estimate interrater reliability. Results: Overall interrater reliability for wound classification was poor (κ = 0.30). The following operations were classified as clean: pyloromyotomy, resection of sequestration, resection of sacrococcygeal teratoma, oophorectomy, and immediate repair of omphalocele; as clean-contaminated: Ladd procedure, bowel resection for midgut volvulus and meconium peritonitis, fistula ligation of tracheoesophageal fistula, primary esophageal anastomosis of esophageal atresia, thoracic lobectomy, staged closure of gastroschisis, delayed repair and primary closure of omphalocele, perineal anoplasty and diverting colostomy for imperforate anus, anal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease, and colostomy closure; and as dirty: perforated necrotizing enterocolitis. Conclusions: There is poor consensus on how neonatal operations are classified based on contamination. An improved classification system will provide more accurate risk assessment for development of surgical site infections and identify neonates who would benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1206-1211
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Umbilical Hernia
Colostomy
Wounds and Injuries
Imperforate Anus
Gastroschisis
Tracheoesophageal Fistula
Esophageal Atresia
Surgical Wound Infection
Meconium
Hirschsprung Disease
Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Teratoma
Ovariectomy
Peritonitis
Fistula
Ligation
Thorax
Newborn Infant
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Antibiotics
  • Neonatal surgery
  • Pediatrics
  • Risk assessment
  • Surgical site infections
  • Wound classification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Conflicts in wound classification of neonatal operations. / Vu, Lan T.; Nobuhara, Kerilyn K.; Lee, Hanmin; Farmer, Diana L.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 44, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 1206-1211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vu, Lan T. ; Nobuhara, Kerilyn K. ; Lee, Hanmin ; Farmer, Diana L. / Conflicts in wound classification of neonatal operations. In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 44, No. 6. pp. 1206-1211.
@article{b20b8c16c3fc47329d493edb4b88dcbf,
title = "Conflicts in wound classification of neonatal operations",
abstract = "Background/Purpose: This study sought to determine the reliability of wound classification guidelines when applied to neonatal operations. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional web-based survey of pediatric surgeons. From a random sample of 22 neonatal operations, participants classified each operation as {"}clean,{"} {"}clean-contaminated,{"} {"}contaminated,{"} or {"}dirty or infected,{"} and specified duration of perioperative antibiotics as {"}none,{"} {"}single preoperative,{"} {"}24 hours,{"} or {"}>24 hours.{"} Unweighted κ score was calculated to estimate interrater reliability. Results: Overall interrater reliability for wound classification was poor (κ = 0.30). The following operations were classified as clean: pyloromyotomy, resection of sequestration, resection of sacrococcygeal teratoma, oophorectomy, and immediate repair of omphalocele; as clean-contaminated: Ladd procedure, bowel resection for midgut volvulus and meconium peritonitis, fistula ligation of tracheoesophageal fistula, primary esophageal anastomosis of esophageal atresia, thoracic lobectomy, staged closure of gastroschisis, delayed repair and primary closure of omphalocele, perineal anoplasty and diverting colostomy for imperforate anus, anal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease, and colostomy closure; and as dirty: perforated necrotizing enterocolitis. Conclusions: There is poor consensus on how neonatal operations are classified based on contamination. An improved classification system will provide more accurate risk assessment for development of surgical site infections and identify neonates who would benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis.",
keywords = "Antibiotics, Neonatal surgery, Pediatrics, Risk assessment, Surgical site infections, Wound classification",
author = "Vu, {Lan T.} and Nobuhara, {Kerilyn K.} and Hanmin Lee and Farmer, {Diana L}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1206--1211",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflicts in wound classification of neonatal operations

AU - Vu, Lan T.

AU - Nobuhara, Kerilyn K.

AU - Lee, Hanmin

AU - Farmer, Diana L

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Background/Purpose: This study sought to determine the reliability of wound classification guidelines when applied to neonatal operations. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional web-based survey of pediatric surgeons. From a random sample of 22 neonatal operations, participants classified each operation as "clean," "clean-contaminated," "contaminated," or "dirty or infected," and specified duration of perioperative antibiotics as "none," "single preoperative," "24 hours," or ">24 hours." Unweighted κ score was calculated to estimate interrater reliability. Results: Overall interrater reliability for wound classification was poor (κ = 0.30). The following operations were classified as clean: pyloromyotomy, resection of sequestration, resection of sacrococcygeal teratoma, oophorectomy, and immediate repair of omphalocele; as clean-contaminated: Ladd procedure, bowel resection for midgut volvulus and meconium peritonitis, fistula ligation of tracheoesophageal fistula, primary esophageal anastomosis of esophageal atresia, thoracic lobectomy, staged closure of gastroschisis, delayed repair and primary closure of omphalocele, perineal anoplasty and diverting colostomy for imperforate anus, anal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease, and colostomy closure; and as dirty: perforated necrotizing enterocolitis. Conclusions: There is poor consensus on how neonatal operations are classified based on contamination. An improved classification system will provide more accurate risk assessment for development of surgical site infections and identify neonates who would benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis.

AB - Background/Purpose: This study sought to determine the reliability of wound classification guidelines when applied to neonatal operations. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional web-based survey of pediatric surgeons. From a random sample of 22 neonatal operations, participants classified each operation as "clean," "clean-contaminated," "contaminated," or "dirty or infected," and specified duration of perioperative antibiotics as "none," "single preoperative," "24 hours," or ">24 hours." Unweighted κ score was calculated to estimate interrater reliability. Results: Overall interrater reliability for wound classification was poor (κ = 0.30). The following operations were classified as clean: pyloromyotomy, resection of sequestration, resection of sacrococcygeal teratoma, oophorectomy, and immediate repair of omphalocele; as clean-contaminated: Ladd procedure, bowel resection for midgut volvulus and meconium peritonitis, fistula ligation of tracheoesophageal fistula, primary esophageal anastomosis of esophageal atresia, thoracic lobectomy, staged closure of gastroschisis, delayed repair and primary closure of omphalocele, perineal anoplasty and diverting colostomy for imperforate anus, anal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease, and colostomy closure; and as dirty: perforated necrotizing enterocolitis. Conclusions: There is poor consensus on how neonatal operations are classified based on contamination. An improved classification system will provide more accurate risk assessment for development of surgical site infections and identify neonates who would benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis.

KW - Antibiotics

KW - Neonatal surgery

KW - Pediatrics

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Surgical site infections

KW - Wound classification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66649125470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66649125470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.026

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 19524742

AN - SCOPUS:66649125470

VL - 44

SP - 1206

EP - 1211

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 6

ER -