Conflict monitoring versus selection for-action in anterior cingulate cortex

Matthew Botvinick, Leigh E. Nystrom, Kate Fissell, Cameron S Carter, Jonathan D. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1469 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), on the medial surface of the frontal lobes of the brain, is widely believed to be involved in the regulation of attention. Beyond this, however, its specific contribution to cognition remains uncertain. One influential theory has interpreted activation within the ACC as reflecting 'selection-for-action, a set of processes that guide the selection of environmental objects as triggers of or targets for action. We have proposed an alternative hypothesis, in which the ACC serves not to exert top-down attentional control but instead to detect and signal the occurrence of conflicts in information processing. Here, to test this theory against the selection-for-action theory, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure brain activation during performance of a task where, for a particular subset of trials, the strength of selection- for-action is inversely related to the degree of response conflict. Activity within the ACC was greater during trials featuring high levels of conflict (and weak selection-for-action) than during trials with low levels of conflict (and strong selection-for-action), providing evidence in favour of the conflict-monitoring account of ACC function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-181
Number of pages3
JournalNature
Volume402
Issue number6758
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 11 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gyrus Cinguli
Brain
Task Performance and Analysis
Frontal Lobe
Automatic Data Processing
Cognition
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402(6758), 179-181. https://doi.org/10.1038/46035

Conflict monitoring versus selection for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. / Botvinick, Matthew; Nystrom, Leigh E.; Fissell, Kate; Carter, Cameron S; Cohen, Jonathan D.

In: Nature, Vol. 402, No. 6758, 11.11.1999, p. 179-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Botvinick, M, Nystrom, LE, Fissell, K, Carter, CS & Cohen, JD 1999, 'Conflict monitoring versus selection for-action in anterior cingulate cortex', Nature, vol. 402, no. 6758, pp. 179-181. https://doi.org/10.1038/46035
Botvinick, Matthew ; Nystrom, Leigh E. ; Fissell, Kate ; Carter, Cameron S ; Cohen, Jonathan D. / Conflict monitoring versus selection for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. In: Nature. 1999 ; Vol. 402, No. 6758. pp. 179-181.
@article{8fa3c5763d2a48dabe5de04b01c1d381,
title = "Conflict monitoring versus selection for-action in anterior cingulate cortex",
abstract = "The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), on the medial surface of the frontal lobes of the brain, is widely believed to be involved in the regulation of attention. Beyond this, however, its specific contribution to cognition remains uncertain. One influential theory has interpreted activation within the ACC as reflecting 'selection-for-action, a set of processes that guide the selection of environmental objects as triggers of or targets for action. We have proposed an alternative hypothesis, in which the ACC serves not to exert top-down attentional control but instead to detect and signal the occurrence of conflicts in information processing. Here, to test this theory against the selection-for-action theory, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure brain activation during performance of a task where, for a particular subset of trials, the strength of selection- for-action is inversely related to the degree of response conflict. Activity within the ACC was greater during trials featuring high levels of conflict (and weak selection-for-action) than during trials with low levels of conflict (and strong selection-for-action), providing evidence in favour of the conflict-monitoring account of ACC function.",
author = "Matthew Botvinick and Nystrom, {Leigh E.} and Kate Fissell and Carter, {Cameron S} and Cohen, {Jonathan D.}",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1038/46035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "402",
pages = "179--181",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6758",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict monitoring versus selection for-action in anterior cingulate cortex

AU - Botvinick, Matthew

AU - Nystrom, Leigh E.

AU - Fissell, Kate

AU - Carter, Cameron S

AU - Cohen, Jonathan D.

PY - 1999/11/11

Y1 - 1999/11/11

N2 - The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), on the medial surface of the frontal lobes of the brain, is widely believed to be involved in the regulation of attention. Beyond this, however, its specific contribution to cognition remains uncertain. One influential theory has interpreted activation within the ACC as reflecting 'selection-for-action, a set of processes that guide the selection of environmental objects as triggers of or targets for action. We have proposed an alternative hypothesis, in which the ACC serves not to exert top-down attentional control but instead to detect and signal the occurrence of conflicts in information processing. Here, to test this theory against the selection-for-action theory, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure brain activation during performance of a task where, for a particular subset of trials, the strength of selection- for-action is inversely related to the degree of response conflict. Activity within the ACC was greater during trials featuring high levels of conflict (and weak selection-for-action) than during trials with low levels of conflict (and strong selection-for-action), providing evidence in favour of the conflict-monitoring account of ACC function.

AB - The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), on the medial surface of the frontal lobes of the brain, is widely believed to be involved in the regulation of attention. Beyond this, however, its specific contribution to cognition remains uncertain. One influential theory has interpreted activation within the ACC as reflecting 'selection-for-action, a set of processes that guide the selection of environmental objects as triggers of or targets for action. We have proposed an alternative hypothesis, in which the ACC serves not to exert top-down attentional control but instead to detect and signal the occurrence of conflicts in information processing. Here, to test this theory against the selection-for-action theory, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure brain activation during performance of a task where, for a particular subset of trials, the strength of selection- for-action is inversely related to the degree of response conflict. Activity within the ACC was greater during trials featuring high levels of conflict (and weak selection-for-action) than during trials with low levels of conflict (and strong selection-for-action), providing evidence in favour of the conflict-monitoring account of ACC function.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033547441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033547441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/46035

DO - 10.1038/46035

M3 - Article

C2 - 10647008

AN - SCOPUS:0033547441

VL - 402

SP - 179

EP - 181

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 6758

ER -