Computerized neurocognitive scanning: I. Methodology and validation in healthy people

Ruben C. Gur, John D Ragland, Paul J. Moberg, Travis H. Turner, Warren B. Bilker, Christian Kohler, Steven J. Siegel, Raquel E. Gur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

292 Scopus citations


Neuropsychological testing batteries are applied in neurobehavioral evaluations of brain disorders, including neuropsychiatric populations. They are lengthy, require expert administrators and professional scorers, and are prone to data handling errors. We describe a brief computerized neurocognitive "scan" that assesses similar domains with adequate reliability. The scan and a traditional battery were administered to a sample of 92 healthy individuals (44 men, 48 women) in a counterbalanced order. Both approaches showed a significant "sex-typical" gradient, with women outperforming men in verbal memory relative to spatial tasks. Both methods also yielded similar profiles of sex differences, with the additional computerized measure of face memory showing better performance in women. Age effects were evident for both methods, but the computerized scan isolated the effects to speed rather than accuracy. Therefore, the computerized scan has favorable reliability and construct validity and can be applied efficiently to study healthy variability related to age and gender.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)766-776
Number of pages11
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes


  • Aging
  • Computerized assessment
  • Neurocognition
  • Neuropsychological testing
  • Psychometrics
  • Sex differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology


Dive into the research topics of 'Computerized neurocognitive scanning: I. Methodology and validation in healthy people'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this