Complications of aortic valve surgery: Manifestations at CT and MR imaging

Nancy Pham, Hesham Zaitoun, Tan Lucien Mohammed, Erasmo Delapena-Almaguer, Felipe Martinez, Gian M. Novaro, Jacobo Kirsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aortic valve replacement accounts for a significant portion of cardiac surgeries in the United States. Despite advances in prosthetic heart valve design, surgical technique, and postoperative care, complications after aortic valve replacement remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Routine surveillance of prosthetic heart valves with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and fluoroscopy is important, as these techniques allow accurate detection of prosthetic valve dysfunction. However, echocardiography and fluoroscopy may not allow identification of the specific underlying cause, including paravalvular leak, dehiscence, endocarditis, obstruction, structural failure, pseudoaneurysm formation, aortic dissection, and hemolysis. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) have an emerging role as diagnostic tools complementary to conventional imaging for detection and monitoring of complications after aortic valve replacement. The choice between CT and MR imaging depends on individual patient characteristics, the type of prosthetic valve, and the acuity of the clinical situation. In general, screening with TTE followed by TEE is recommended. When results of TTE and TEE are inconclusive, cardiac CT and MR imaging should be considered. The choice between these imaging techniques depends on the presence of patient-specific contraindications to CT or MR imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1873-1892
Number of pages20
JournalRadiographics
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 21 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aortic Valve
Echocardiography
Transesophageal Echocardiography
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Fluoroscopy
Heart Valves
Postoperative Care
False Aneurysm
Hemolysis
Endocarditis
Thoracic Surgery
Dissection
Morbidity
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Pham, N., Zaitoun, H., Mohammed, T. L., Delapena-Almaguer, E., Martinez, F., Novaro, G. M., & Kirsch, J. (2012). Complications of aortic valve surgery: Manifestations at CT and MR imaging. Radiographics, 32(7), 1873-1892. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.327115735

Complications of aortic valve surgery : Manifestations at CT and MR imaging. / Pham, Nancy; Zaitoun, Hesham; Mohammed, Tan Lucien; Delapena-Almaguer, Erasmo; Martinez, Felipe; Novaro, Gian M.; Kirsch, Jacobo.

In: Radiographics, Vol. 32, No. 7, 21.11.2012, p. 1873-1892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pham, N, Zaitoun, H, Mohammed, TL, Delapena-Almaguer, E, Martinez, F, Novaro, GM & Kirsch, J 2012, 'Complications of aortic valve surgery: Manifestations at CT and MR imaging', Radiographics, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1873-1892. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.327115735
Pham N, Zaitoun H, Mohammed TL, Delapena-Almaguer E, Martinez F, Novaro GM et al. Complications of aortic valve surgery: Manifestations at CT and MR imaging. Radiographics. 2012 Nov 21;32(7):1873-1892. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.327115735
Pham, Nancy ; Zaitoun, Hesham ; Mohammed, Tan Lucien ; Delapena-Almaguer, Erasmo ; Martinez, Felipe ; Novaro, Gian M. ; Kirsch, Jacobo. / Complications of aortic valve surgery : Manifestations at CT and MR imaging. In: Radiographics. 2012 ; Vol. 32, No. 7. pp. 1873-1892.
@article{10e62ebfb4a34490a191e45a23de8d11,
title = "Complications of aortic valve surgery: Manifestations at CT and MR imaging",
abstract = "Aortic valve replacement accounts for a significant portion of cardiac surgeries in the United States. Despite advances in prosthetic heart valve design, surgical technique, and postoperative care, complications after aortic valve replacement remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Routine surveillance of prosthetic heart valves with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and fluoroscopy is important, as these techniques allow accurate detection of prosthetic valve dysfunction. However, echocardiography and fluoroscopy may not allow identification of the specific underlying cause, including paravalvular leak, dehiscence, endocarditis, obstruction, structural failure, pseudoaneurysm formation, aortic dissection, and hemolysis. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) have an emerging role as diagnostic tools complementary to conventional imaging for detection and monitoring of complications after aortic valve replacement. The choice between CT and MR imaging depends on individual patient characteristics, the type of prosthetic valve, and the acuity of the clinical situation. In general, screening with TTE followed by TEE is recommended. When results of TTE and TEE are inconclusive, cardiac CT and MR imaging should be considered. The choice between these imaging techniques depends on the presence of patient-specific contraindications to CT or MR imaging.",
author = "Nancy Pham and Hesham Zaitoun and Mohammed, {Tan Lucien} and Erasmo Delapena-Almaguer and Felipe Martinez and Novaro, {Gian M.} and Jacobo Kirsch",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1148/rg.327115735",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1873--1892",
journal = "Radiographics",
issn = "0271-5333",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complications of aortic valve surgery

T2 - Manifestations at CT and MR imaging

AU - Pham, Nancy

AU - Zaitoun, Hesham

AU - Mohammed, Tan Lucien

AU - Delapena-Almaguer, Erasmo

AU - Martinez, Felipe

AU - Novaro, Gian M.

AU - Kirsch, Jacobo

PY - 2012/11/21

Y1 - 2012/11/21

N2 - Aortic valve replacement accounts for a significant portion of cardiac surgeries in the United States. Despite advances in prosthetic heart valve design, surgical technique, and postoperative care, complications after aortic valve replacement remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Routine surveillance of prosthetic heart valves with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and fluoroscopy is important, as these techniques allow accurate detection of prosthetic valve dysfunction. However, echocardiography and fluoroscopy may not allow identification of the specific underlying cause, including paravalvular leak, dehiscence, endocarditis, obstruction, structural failure, pseudoaneurysm formation, aortic dissection, and hemolysis. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) have an emerging role as diagnostic tools complementary to conventional imaging for detection and monitoring of complications after aortic valve replacement. The choice between CT and MR imaging depends on individual patient characteristics, the type of prosthetic valve, and the acuity of the clinical situation. In general, screening with TTE followed by TEE is recommended. When results of TTE and TEE are inconclusive, cardiac CT and MR imaging should be considered. The choice between these imaging techniques depends on the presence of patient-specific contraindications to CT or MR imaging.

AB - Aortic valve replacement accounts for a significant portion of cardiac surgeries in the United States. Despite advances in prosthetic heart valve design, surgical technique, and postoperative care, complications after aortic valve replacement remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Routine surveillance of prosthetic heart valves with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and fluoroscopy is important, as these techniques allow accurate detection of prosthetic valve dysfunction. However, echocardiography and fluoroscopy may not allow identification of the specific underlying cause, including paravalvular leak, dehiscence, endocarditis, obstruction, structural failure, pseudoaneurysm formation, aortic dissection, and hemolysis. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) have an emerging role as diagnostic tools complementary to conventional imaging for detection and monitoring of complications after aortic valve replacement. The choice between CT and MR imaging depends on individual patient characteristics, the type of prosthetic valve, and the acuity of the clinical situation. In general, screening with TTE followed by TEE is recommended. When results of TTE and TEE are inconclusive, cardiac CT and MR imaging should be considered. The choice between these imaging techniques depends on the presence of patient-specific contraindications to CT or MR imaging.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869217353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869217353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/rg.327115735

DO - 10.1148/rg.327115735

M3 - Article

C2 - 23150846

AN - SCOPUS:84869217353

VL - 32

SP - 1873

EP - 1892

JO - Radiographics

JF - Radiographics

SN - 0271-5333

IS - 7

ER -