Abstract
Background: Compliance with antibiotic dosing guidelines and achievement of target serum concentrations in patients with infection who are on renal replacement therapy (RRT) is complex, essential for supportive care, and not well studied. Objective: To determine adherence rates to antibiotic dosing guidelines in the setting of RRT in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, cohort study evaluating antibiotic dosing in all patients in the ICU receiving RRT between July 2007 and June 2009. Appropriate dosing was determined by comparing dose administered with established guidelines. Dosing was denoted as accurate if adjustment occurred prior to the third administered dose or, if appropriate dosing is every 12 hours or more, within 24 hours. We compared rates according to modality of RRT (intermittent hemodialysis [IHD] vs continuous veno-venous hemodialysis [CWHD]), indication for RRT (acute kidney injury [AKI] vs end-stage renal disease [ESRD]), and presence of a clinical pharmacist on rounds. Results: Adherence rates of 546 patients receiving RRT, with 1761 individual antibiotic prescriptions, were analyzed. Dosing errors were more common in the group receiving CWHD than in the IHD group (58.1% vs 49.5%; p < 0.001). Frequency of dosing errors did not differ significantly between patients receiving RRT for AKI versus those with ESRD (55.4% vs 51.3%; p = 0.24) or in ICUs with or without a pharmacist on rounds (53.0% vs 54.6%; p = 0.67). Underdosing occurred less frequently with a clinical pharmacist on rounds (18.7% vs 31.3%; p < 0.001). However, in-hospital mortality was not significantly different in underdosed individuals compared with the rest of the cohort (52.3% vs 51.6%; p = 0.92). Conclusions: Antibiotic underdosing is common. Increased awareness of dose adjustment guidelines for CWHD and having a clinical pharmacist on rounds may improve rates of underdosing.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 161-169 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Pharmacy Technology |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 16 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pharmaceutical Science
Cite this
Compliance with antibiotic dosing guidelines in critically III patients receiving renal replacement therapy. / Udani, Suneel; Chen, Ling-Xin; Daley, Mitchell; Lat, Ishaq; Koyner, Jay L.
In: Journal of Pharmacy Technology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 16.09.2013, p. 161-169.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Compliance with antibiotic dosing guidelines in critically III patients receiving renal replacement therapy
AU - Udani, Suneel
AU - Chen, Ling-Xin
AU - Daley, Mitchell
AU - Lat, Ishaq
AU - Koyner, Jay L.
PY - 2013/9/16
Y1 - 2013/9/16
N2 - Background: Compliance with antibiotic dosing guidelines and achievement of target serum concentrations in patients with infection who are on renal replacement therapy (RRT) is complex, essential for supportive care, and not well studied. Objective: To determine adherence rates to antibiotic dosing guidelines in the setting of RRT in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, cohort study evaluating antibiotic dosing in all patients in the ICU receiving RRT between July 2007 and June 2009. Appropriate dosing was determined by comparing dose administered with established guidelines. Dosing was denoted as accurate if adjustment occurred prior to the third administered dose or, if appropriate dosing is every 12 hours or more, within 24 hours. We compared rates according to modality of RRT (intermittent hemodialysis [IHD] vs continuous veno-venous hemodialysis [CWHD]), indication for RRT (acute kidney injury [AKI] vs end-stage renal disease [ESRD]), and presence of a clinical pharmacist on rounds. Results: Adherence rates of 546 patients receiving RRT, with 1761 individual antibiotic prescriptions, were analyzed. Dosing errors were more common in the group receiving CWHD than in the IHD group (58.1% vs 49.5%; p < 0.001). Frequency of dosing errors did not differ significantly between patients receiving RRT for AKI versus those with ESRD (55.4% vs 51.3%; p = 0.24) or in ICUs with or without a pharmacist on rounds (53.0% vs 54.6%; p = 0.67). Underdosing occurred less frequently with a clinical pharmacist on rounds (18.7% vs 31.3%; p < 0.001). However, in-hospital mortality was not significantly different in underdosed individuals compared with the rest of the cohort (52.3% vs 51.6%; p = 0.92). Conclusions: Antibiotic underdosing is common. Increased awareness of dose adjustment guidelines for CWHD and having a clinical pharmacist on rounds may improve rates of underdosing.
AB - Background: Compliance with antibiotic dosing guidelines and achievement of target serum concentrations in patients with infection who are on renal replacement therapy (RRT) is complex, essential for supportive care, and not well studied. Objective: To determine adherence rates to antibiotic dosing guidelines in the setting of RRT in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, cohort study evaluating antibiotic dosing in all patients in the ICU receiving RRT between July 2007 and June 2009. Appropriate dosing was determined by comparing dose administered with established guidelines. Dosing was denoted as accurate if adjustment occurred prior to the third administered dose or, if appropriate dosing is every 12 hours or more, within 24 hours. We compared rates according to modality of RRT (intermittent hemodialysis [IHD] vs continuous veno-venous hemodialysis [CWHD]), indication for RRT (acute kidney injury [AKI] vs end-stage renal disease [ESRD]), and presence of a clinical pharmacist on rounds. Results: Adherence rates of 546 patients receiving RRT, with 1761 individual antibiotic prescriptions, were analyzed. Dosing errors were more common in the group receiving CWHD than in the IHD group (58.1% vs 49.5%; p < 0.001). Frequency of dosing errors did not differ significantly between patients receiving RRT for AKI versus those with ESRD (55.4% vs 51.3%; p = 0.24) or in ICUs with or without a pharmacist on rounds (53.0% vs 54.6%; p = 0.67). Underdosing occurred less frequently with a clinical pharmacist on rounds (18.7% vs 31.3%; p < 0.001). However, in-hospital mortality was not significantly different in underdosed individuals compared with the rest of the cohort (52.3% vs 51.6%; p = 0.92). Conclusions: Antibiotic underdosing is common. Increased awareness of dose adjustment guidelines for CWHD and having a clinical pharmacist on rounds may improve rates of underdosing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883737554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883737554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/875512251302900403
DO - 10.1177/875512251302900403
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84883737554
VL - 29
SP - 161
EP - 169
JO - Journal of Pharmacy Technology
JF - Journal of Pharmacy Technology
SN - 8755-1225
IS - 4
ER -