Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare data regarding the cost and number of ultrasonographic (US) examinations performed for 6 months, before and after institution of 24-hour in-house sonographer coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for a 6-month period during which US services were provided by a sonographer on call from 11 PM to 7 AM were compared with data for a 6-month period during which a sonographer was in house during this shift. RESULTS: With 11 PM to 7 AM on-call coverage, the sonographers performed 147 examinations in a 6-month period, an average of 0.81 examination per shift. After institution of in-house coverage for this shift, 792 US examinations were performed in 6 months, an average of 4.3 examinations per shift. The cost for 11 PM to 7 AM in-house sonographer coverage for 6 months was approximately $16,000 more than that for on-call coverage. This cost would be offset by revenues from one additional examination per night. The cost per examination for the 11 PM to 7 AM shift decreased from $124.70 to $43.33. CONCLUSION: At the authors' institution, 24-hour in-house sonographer coverage resulted in additional cost, which was offset by revenues from additional examinations. There was nearly a fivefold increase in the number of US examinations performed per shift. These examinations were performed more expediently, enabling more rapid patient triage.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 788-791 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Radiology |
| Volume | 216 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| State | Published - 2000 |
Keywords
- Cost-effectiveness
- Emergency medical service system
- Radiology and radiologists, departmental management
- Ultrasound (US), utilization
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology