Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol

Anirban Maitra, Shaina V. Hirany, Ishwarlal Jialal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the LipiDirect assay (L-LDL) against the Direct LDL(TM) immunoseparation method (D-LDL) and beta quantification (BQ-LDL) for measurement of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with normo- and hypertriglyceridemia. Samples from 156 patients [triglyceride (Tg) range 0.61-9.95 g/L] were assayed for LDL-C concentrations with the three methods. An additional seven patients with type III hyperlipidemia and 25 paired sera from fasting and nonfasting individuals also were analyzed by the three methods. Both assays displayed excellent precision. The mean LDL-C value from L-LDL was significantly higher than BQ- LDL and D-LDL in normo- and hypertriglyceridemic samples (P <0.001). The mean absolute bias of L-LDL vs BQ-LDL was 12.7% for Tg <4 g/L and 30.6% for Tg ≤4 g/L, compared with 6.2% and 12.5%, respectively, for D-LDL. L-LDL correctly classified only 68% of patients with LDL-C <1.30 g/L and 57% of patients with LDL-C between 1.30-1.59 g/L as compared with 98% and 93%, respectively, for D-LDL (P <0.001). In patients with type III hyperlipidemia, L-LDL had a 130% positive bias with BQ-LDL as compared with a 14% negative bias for D-LDL. With all three methods there were no significant differences between samples from fasting and nonfasting individuals. On the basis of these findings, the D-LDL assay appears to be superior to the L-LDL assay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1040-1047
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Chemistry
Volume43
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

LDL Cholesterol
Assays
Triglycerides
oxidized low density lipoprotein
Hyperlipidemias
Fasting
Hypertriglyceridemia

Keywords

  • Beta quantification
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Hypertriglyceridemia
  • Immunoseparation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Maitra, A., Hirany, S. V., & Jialal, I. (1997). Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol. Clinical Chemistry, 43(6), 1040-1047.

Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol. / Maitra, Anirban; Hirany, Shaina V.; Jialal, Ishwarlal.

In: Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 43, No. 6, 1997, p. 1040-1047.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maitra, A, Hirany, SV & Jialal, I 1997, 'Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol', Clinical Chemistry, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1040-1047.
Maitra A, Hirany SV, Jialal I. Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol. Clinical Chemistry. 1997;43(6):1040-1047.
Maitra, Anirban ; Hirany, Shaina V. ; Jialal, Ishwarlal. / Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol. In: Clinical Chemistry. 1997 ; Vol. 43, No. 6. pp. 1040-1047.
@article{3da927b700fa4a2d8e1120205c048818,
title = "Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the LipiDirect assay (L-LDL) against the Direct LDL(TM) immunoseparation method (D-LDL) and beta quantification (BQ-LDL) for measurement of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with normo- and hypertriglyceridemia. Samples from 156 patients [triglyceride (Tg) range 0.61-9.95 g/L] were assayed for LDL-C concentrations with the three methods. An additional seven patients with type III hyperlipidemia and 25 paired sera from fasting and nonfasting individuals also were analyzed by the three methods. Both assays displayed excellent precision. The mean LDL-C value from L-LDL was significantly higher than BQ- LDL and D-LDL in normo- and hypertriglyceridemic samples (P <0.001). The mean absolute bias of L-LDL vs BQ-LDL was 12.7{\%} for Tg <4 g/L and 30.6{\%} for Tg ≤4 g/L, compared with 6.2{\%} and 12.5{\%}, respectively, for D-LDL. L-LDL correctly classified only 68{\%} of patients with LDL-C <1.30 g/L and 57{\%} of patients with LDL-C between 1.30-1.59 g/L as compared with 98{\%} and 93{\%}, respectively, for D-LDL (P <0.001). In patients with type III hyperlipidemia, L-LDL had a 130{\%} positive bias with BQ-LDL as compared with a 14{\%} negative bias for D-LDL. With all three methods there were no significant differences between samples from fasting and nonfasting individuals. On the basis of these findings, the D-LDL assay appears to be superior to the L-LDL assay.",
keywords = "Beta quantification, Coronary artery disease, Hypertriglyceridemia, Immunoseparation",
author = "Anirban Maitra and Hirany, {Shaina V.} and Ishwarlal Jialal",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1040--1047",
journal = "Clinical Chemistry",
issn = "0009-9147",
publisher = "American Association for Clinical Chemistry Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol

AU - Maitra, Anirban

AU - Hirany, Shaina V.

AU - Jialal, Ishwarlal

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the LipiDirect assay (L-LDL) against the Direct LDL(TM) immunoseparation method (D-LDL) and beta quantification (BQ-LDL) for measurement of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with normo- and hypertriglyceridemia. Samples from 156 patients [triglyceride (Tg) range 0.61-9.95 g/L] were assayed for LDL-C concentrations with the three methods. An additional seven patients with type III hyperlipidemia and 25 paired sera from fasting and nonfasting individuals also were analyzed by the three methods. Both assays displayed excellent precision. The mean LDL-C value from L-LDL was significantly higher than BQ- LDL and D-LDL in normo- and hypertriglyceridemic samples (P <0.001). The mean absolute bias of L-LDL vs BQ-LDL was 12.7% for Tg <4 g/L and 30.6% for Tg ≤4 g/L, compared with 6.2% and 12.5%, respectively, for D-LDL. L-LDL correctly classified only 68% of patients with LDL-C <1.30 g/L and 57% of patients with LDL-C between 1.30-1.59 g/L as compared with 98% and 93%, respectively, for D-LDL (P <0.001). In patients with type III hyperlipidemia, L-LDL had a 130% positive bias with BQ-LDL as compared with a 14% negative bias for D-LDL. With all three methods there were no significant differences between samples from fasting and nonfasting individuals. On the basis of these findings, the D-LDL assay appears to be superior to the L-LDL assay.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the LipiDirect assay (L-LDL) against the Direct LDL(TM) immunoseparation method (D-LDL) and beta quantification (BQ-LDL) for measurement of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with normo- and hypertriglyceridemia. Samples from 156 patients [triglyceride (Tg) range 0.61-9.95 g/L] were assayed for LDL-C concentrations with the three methods. An additional seven patients with type III hyperlipidemia and 25 paired sera from fasting and nonfasting individuals also were analyzed by the three methods. Both assays displayed excellent precision. The mean LDL-C value from L-LDL was significantly higher than BQ- LDL and D-LDL in normo- and hypertriglyceridemic samples (P <0.001). The mean absolute bias of L-LDL vs BQ-LDL was 12.7% for Tg <4 g/L and 30.6% for Tg ≤4 g/L, compared with 6.2% and 12.5%, respectively, for D-LDL. L-LDL correctly classified only 68% of patients with LDL-C <1.30 g/L and 57% of patients with LDL-C between 1.30-1.59 g/L as compared with 98% and 93%, respectively, for D-LDL (P <0.001). In patients with type III hyperlipidemia, L-LDL had a 130% positive bias with BQ-LDL as compared with a 14% negative bias for D-LDL. With all three methods there were no significant differences between samples from fasting and nonfasting individuals. On the basis of these findings, the D-LDL assay appears to be superior to the L-LDL assay.

KW - Beta quantification

KW - Coronary artery disease

KW - Hypertriglyceridemia

KW - Immunoseparation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030962227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030962227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9191559

AN - SCOPUS:0030962227

VL - 43

SP - 1040

EP - 1047

JO - Clinical Chemistry

JF - Clinical Chemistry

SN - 0009-9147

IS - 6

ER -