Comparison of titanium and biodegradable plates for treating midfacial fractures

Il Gyu Kang, Joo Hyun Jung, Seon Tae Kim, Ji Yun Choi, Jonathan M Sykes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the use of titanium plates and screws (TPSs) versus biodegradable plates and screws (BPSs) for fixation of midfacial fractures. In addition, complications related to the plates and rates of secondary surgery for plate removal were compared. Patients and Methods From March 2005 to March 2012, 109 patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-six patients with TPSs implanted to fix midfacial fractures (group A) and 53 patients with BPSs to treat midfacial fractures (group B) were evaluated. Patients' histories of plate-related nonunion, infection, displacement, pain, and palpability and secondary surgery for plate removal were checked. Results None of the study participants developed nonunion issues related to the TPSs or BPSs. Six patients in group A developed complications associated with TPSs and 5 patients underwent secondary surgery for plate removal. One patient (1.8%) had a plate-related infection, 1 patient (1.8%) developed plate extrusion, 1 patient (1.8%) had plate-associated chronic pain, 2 patients (3.6%) complained of palpability, and 2 patients (3.6%) developed psychological problems (1 patient developed 2 complications). In contrast, only 1 patient in group B (2%) complained of temporary palpability, and this problem disappeared over time. None of the patients in group B complained of any other problems. Conclusions The results indicated that BPSs and TPSs have the potential for successfully treating midfacial fractures. BPSs are suitable for treating midfacial fractures and could serve as an alternative for TPSs in selected cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume72
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Titanium
Fracture Fixation
Infection
Chronic Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of titanium and biodegradable plates for treating midfacial fractures. / Kang, Il Gyu; Jung, Joo Hyun; Kim, Seon Tae; Choi, Ji Yun; Sykes, Jonathan M.

In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 72, No. 4, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kang, Il Gyu ; Jung, Joo Hyun ; Kim, Seon Tae ; Choi, Ji Yun ; Sykes, Jonathan M. / Comparison of titanium and biodegradable plates for treating midfacial fractures. In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 72, No. 4.
@article{0de17efca1bc4236909336c83f777ea5,
title = "Comparison of titanium and biodegradable plates for treating midfacial fractures",
abstract = "Purpose The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the use of titanium plates and screws (TPSs) versus biodegradable plates and screws (BPSs) for fixation of midfacial fractures. In addition, complications related to the plates and rates of secondary surgery for plate removal were compared. Patients and Methods From March 2005 to March 2012, 109 patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-six patients with TPSs implanted to fix midfacial fractures (group A) and 53 patients with BPSs to treat midfacial fractures (group B) were evaluated. Patients' histories of plate-related nonunion, infection, displacement, pain, and palpability and secondary surgery for plate removal were checked. Results None of the study participants developed nonunion issues related to the TPSs or BPSs. Six patients in group A developed complications associated with TPSs and 5 patients underwent secondary surgery for plate removal. One patient (1.8{\%}) had a plate-related infection, 1 patient (1.8{\%}) developed plate extrusion, 1 patient (1.8{\%}) had plate-associated chronic pain, 2 patients (3.6{\%}) complained of palpability, and 2 patients (3.6{\%}) developed psychological problems (1 patient developed 2 complications). In contrast, only 1 patient in group B (2{\%}) complained of temporary palpability, and this problem disappeared over time. None of the patients in group B complained of any other problems. Conclusions The results indicated that BPSs and TPSs have the potential for successfully treating midfacial fractures. BPSs are suitable for treating midfacial fractures and could serve as an alternative for TPSs in selected cases.",
author = "Kang, {Il Gyu} and Jung, {Joo Hyun} and Kim, {Seon Tae} and Choi, {Ji Yun} and Sykes, {Jonathan M}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.joms.2013.12.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
journal = "Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "0278-2391",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of titanium and biodegradable plates for treating midfacial fractures

AU - Kang, Il Gyu

AU - Jung, Joo Hyun

AU - Kim, Seon Tae

AU - Choi, Ji Yun

AU - Sykes, Jonathan M

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the use of titanium plates and screws (TPSs) versus biodegradable plates and screws (BPSs) for fixation of midfacial fractures. In addition, complications related to the plates and rates of secondary surgery for plate removal were compared. Patients and Methods From March 2005 to March 2012, 109 patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-six patients with TPSs implanted to fix midfacial fractures (group A) and 53 patients with BPSs to treat midfacial fractures (group B) were evaluated. Patients' histories of plate-related nonunion, infection, displacement, pain, and palpability and secondary surgery for plate removal were checked. Results None of the study participants developed nonunion issues related to the TPSs or BPSs. Six patients in group A developed complications associated with TPSs and 5 patients underwent secondary surgery for plate removal. One patient (1.8%) had a plate-related infection, 1 patient (1.8%) developed plate extrusion, 1 patient (1.8%) had plate-associated chronic pain, 2 patients (3.6%) complained of palpability, and 2 patients (3.6%) developed psychological problems (1 patient developed 2 complications). In contrast, only 1 patient in group B (2%) complained of temporary palpability, and this problem disappeared over time. None of the patients in group B complained of any other problems. Conclusions The results indicated that BPSs and TPSs have the potential for successfully treating midfacial fractures. BPSs are suitable for treating midfacial fractures and could serve as an alternative for TPSs in selected cases.

AB - Purpose The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the use of titanium plates and screws (TPSs) versus biodegradable plates and screws (BPSs) for fixation of midfacial fractures. In addition, complications related to the plates and rates of secondary surgery for plate removal were compared. Patients and Methods From March 2005 to March 2012, 109 patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-six patients with TPSs implanted to fix midfacial fractures (group A) and 53 patients with BPSs to treat midfacial fractures (group B) were evaluated. Patients' histories of plate-related nonunion, infection, displacement, pain, and palpability and secondary surgery for plate removal were checked. Results None of the study participants developed nonunion issues related to the TPSs or BPSs. Six patients in group A developed complications associated with TPSs and 5 patients underwent secondary surgery for plate removal. One patient (1.8%) had a plate-related infection, 1 patient (1.8%) developed plate extrusion, 1 patient (1.8%) had plate-associated chronic pain, 2 patients (3.6%) complained of palpability, and 2 patients (3.6%) developed psychological problems (1 patient developed 2 complications). In contrast, only 1 patient in group B (2%) complained of temporary palpability, and this problem disappeared over time. None of the patients in group B complained of any other problems. Conclusions The results indicated that BPSs and TPSs have the potential for successfully treating midfacial fractures. BPSs are suitable for treating midfacial fractures and could serve as an alternative for TPSs in selected cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896392452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896392452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joms.2013.12.020

DO - 10.1016/j.joms.2013.12.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 24529570

AN - SCOPUS:84896392452

VL - 72

JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 0278-2391

IS - 4

ER -