Comparison of the rotation-advancement and philtral ridge techniques for unilateral cleft lip repair

Jay M. Cline, Samuel L. Oyer, Hedyeh Javidnia, Shaun A. Nguyen, Jonathan M Sykes, Richard M. Kline, Krishna G. Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Millard rotation-advancement flap has become the most widely used technique for unilateral cleft lip repair. The philtral ridge repair is a modified straight-line technique that was developed to further optimize the scar associated with the rotation-advancement flap. The purpose of this article is to introduce the philtral ridge repair and objectively compare the outcomes of these two techniques. Methods: Two senior board-certified surgeons, who are active members of their respective craniofacial teams, use different surgical techniques for the unilateral cleft lip: the philtral ridge and rotation-advancement repairs. The authors retrospectively analyzed preoperative and postoperative photographs of consecutive patients who underwent repair performed by each surgeon between 2003 and 2009. Using Adobe Photoshop imaging software, facial points on the cleft and noncleft sides were measured, including height and symmetry of Cupid's bow, width and height of the nasal vestibule, height of the vermilion, and alar base position. Ratios of cleft side to noncleft side measurements were calculated to standardize comparisons between patients. In addition, the symmetry of each lip repair was graded subjectively by health care professionals and the general public. Results: There were no differences in preoperative ratios between the two techniques with the exception of a wider cleft nasal vestibule in the rotation-advancement group (p = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative measures or subjective analysis of symmetry between the groups. Conclusion: Both the rotation-advancement and philtral ridge techniques produced outcomes with a high degree of facial symmetry and are excellent options for unilateral cleft lip repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1269-1278
Number of pages10
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume134
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Cleft Lip
Nose
Lip
Cicatrix
Software
Delivery of Health Care
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of the rotation-advancement and philtral ridge techniques for unilateral cleft lip repair. / Cline, Jay M.; Oyer, Samuel L.; Javidnia, Hedyeh; Nguyen, Shaun A.; Sykes, Jonathan M; Kline, Richard M.; Patel, Krishna G.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 134, No. 6, 2014, p. 1269-1278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cline, Jay M. ; Oyer, Samuel L. ; Javidnia, Hedyeh ; Nguyen, Shaun A. ; Sykes, Jonathan M ; Kline, Richard M. ; Patel, Krishna G. / Comparison of the rotation-advancement and philtral ridge techniques for unilateral cleft lip repair. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 134, No. 6. pp. 1269-1278.
@article{92dd25cdcaa6491abd71379f583251ce,
title = "Comparison of the rotation-advancement and philtral ridge techniques for unilateral cleft lip repair",
abstract = "Background: The Millard rotation-advancement flap has become the most widely used technique for unilateral cleft lip repair. The philtral ridge repair is a modified straight-line technique that was developed to further optimize the scar associated with the rotation-advancement flap. The purpose of this article is to introduce the philtral ridge repair and objectively compare the outcomes of these two techniques. Methods: Two senior board-certified surgeons, who are active members of their respective craniofacial teams, use different surgical techniques for the unilateral cleft lip: the philtral ridge and rotation-advancement repairs. The authors retrospectively analyzed preoperative and postoperative photographs of consecutive patients who underwent repair performed by each surgeon between 2003 and 2009. Using Adobe Photoshop imaging software, facial points on the cleft and noncleft sides were measured, including height and symmetry of Cupid's bow, width and height of the nasal vestibule, height of the vermilion, and alar base position. Ratios of cleft side to noncleft side measurements were calculated to standardize comparisons between patients. In addition, the symmetry of each lip repair was graded subjectively by health care professionals and the general public. Results: There were no differences in preoperative ratios between the two techniques with the exception of a wider cleft nasal vestibule in the rotation-advancement group (p = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative measures or subjective analysis of symmetry between the groups. Conclusion: Both the rotation-advancement and philtral ridge techniques produced outcomes with a high degree of facial symmetry and are excellent options for unilateral cleft lip repair.",
author = "Cline, {Jay M.} and Oyer, {Samuel L.} and Hedyeh Javidnia and Nguyen, {Shaun A.} and Sykes, {Jonathan M} and Kline, {Richard M.} and Patel, {Krishna G.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000000723",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "1269--1278",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the rotation-advancement and philtral ridge techniques for unilateral cleft lip repair

AU - Cline, Jay M.

AU - Oyer, Samuel L.

AU - Javidnia, Hedyeh

AU - Nguyen, Shaun A.

AU - Sykes, Jonathan M

AU - Kline, Richard M.

AU - Patel, Krishna G.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: The Millard rotation-advancement flap has become the most widely used technique for unilateral cleft lip repair. The philtral ridge repair is a modified straight-line technique that was developed to further optimize the scar associated with the rotation-advancement flap. The purpose of this article is to introduce the philtral ridge repair and objectively compare the outcomes of these two techniques. Methods: Two senior board-certified surgeons, who are active members of their respective craniofacial teams, use different surgical techniques for the unilateral cleft lip: the philtral ridge and rotation-advancement repairs. The authors retrospectively analyzed preoperative and postoperative photographs of consecutive patients who underwent repair performed by each surgeon between 2003 and 2009. Using Adobe Photoshop imaging software, facial points on the cleft and noncleft sides were measured, including height and symmetry of Cupid's bow, width and height of the nasal vestibule, height of the vermilion, and alar base position. Ratios of cleft side to noncleft side measurements were calculated to standardize comparisons between patients. In addition, the symmetry of each lip repair was graded subjectively by health care professionals and the general public. Results: There were no differences in preoperative ratios between the two techniques with the exception of a wider cleft nasal vestibule in the rotation-advancement group (p = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative measures or subjective analysis of symmetry between the groups. Conclusion: Both the rotation-advancement and philtral ridge techniques produced outcomes with a high degree of facial symmetry and are excellent options for unilateral cleft lip repair.

AB - Background: The Millard rotation-advancement flap has become the most widely used technique for unilateral cleft lip repair. The philtral ridge repair is a modified straight-line technique that was developed to further optimize the scar associated with the rotation-advancement flap. The purpose of this article is to introduce the philtral ridge repair and objectively compare the outcomes of these two techniques. Methods: Two senior board-certified surgeons, who are active members of their respective craniofacial teams, use different surgical techniques for the unilateral cleft lip: the philtral ridge and rotation-advancement repairs. The authors retrospectively analyzed preoperative and postoperative photographs of consecutive patients who underwent repair performed by each surgeon between 2003 and 2009. Using Adobe Photoshop imaging software, facial points on the cleft and noncleft sides were measured, including height and symmetry of Cupid's bow, width and height of the nasal vestibule, height of the vermilion, and alar base position. Ratios of cleft side to noncleft side measurements were calculated to standardize comparisons between patients. In addition, the symmetry of each lip repair was graded subjectively by health care professionals and the general public. Results: There were no differences in preoperative ratios between the two techniques with the exception of a wider cleft nasal vestibule in the rotation-advancement group (p = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative measures or subjective analysis of symmetry between the groups. Conclusion: Both the rotation-advancement and philtral ridge techniques produced outcomes with a high degree of facial symmetry and are excellent options for unilateral cleft lip repair.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922480912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922480912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000723

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000723

M3 - Article

VL - 134

SP - 1269

EP - 1278

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 6

ER -