Comparison of the nutrient composition of commercial dog milk replacers with that of dog milk

Cailin R. Heinze, Lisa M. Freeman, Camilia R. Martin, Michael L. Power, Andrea J Fascetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective-To compare the nutrient composition of commercially available dog milk replacers with that of dog milk. Design-Prospective, cross-sectional study. Sample-5 dog milk samples and 15 samples of commercial dog milk replacers. Procedures-Dog milk and milk replacers were analyzed for concentrations of total protein, essential amino acids, sugars, total fat, essential fatty acids, calcium, and phosphorus. Energy density was calculated. Results from milk replacers were compared with the range of the concentration of each nutrient in milk samples from mature dogs as well as the National Research Council (NRC) recommendations for puppy growth. Results-Milk replacers varied widely in caloric density and concentration of nutrients such as calcium, protein, and fat. Calcium concentration was lower in 14 of 15 milk replacers than in the dog milk samples. Docosahexaenoic acid was undetectable in 12 of 15 milk replacers but present in all dog milk samples. All milk replacers had numerous essential nutrients outside of the range of the dog milk samples, and many had concentrations of amino acids, essential fatty acids, calcium, and phosphorus less than the NRC minimal requirement or recommended allowance. Compared with NRC recommendations, some dog milk samples had concentrations of total protein, linoleic acid, calcium, or phosphorus less than the recommended allowance. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Results suggested that there was substantial variation in nutrient composition of 15 dog milk replacers and that some products were closer approximations of dog milk than others. Nearly all products would benefit from more appropriate calcium, amino acids, and essential fatty acids concentrations and better feeding directions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1413-1422
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Volume244
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2014

Fingerprint

Milk
nutrient content
Dogs
milk
Food
dogs
Calcium
calcium
Essential Fatty Acids
essential fatty acids
Phosphorus
sampling
phosphorus
Fats
Amino Sugars
Amino Acids
nutrient density
Proteins
amino acids
Essential Amino Acids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of the nutrient composition of commercial dog milk replacers with that of dog milk. / Heinze, Cailin R.; Freeman, Lisa M.; Martin, Camilia R.; Power, Michael L.; Fascetti, Andrea J.

In: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Vol. 244, No. 12, 15.06.2014, p. 1413-1422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heinze, Cailin R. ; Freeman, Lisa M. ; Martin, Camilia R. ; Power, Michael L. ; Fascetti, Andrea J. / Comparison of the nutrient composition of commercial dog milk replacers with that of dog milk. In: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2014 ; Vol. 244, No. 12. pp. 1413-1422.
@article{2f462225ac264beebeb3487128910f56,
title = "Comparison of the nutrient composition of commercial dog milk replacers with that of dog milk",
abstract = "Objective-To compare the nutrient composition of commercially available dog milk replacers with that of dog milk. Design-Prospective, cross-sectional study. Sample-5 dog milk samples and 15 samples of commercial dog milk replacers. Procedures-Dog milk and milk replacers were analyzed for concentrations of total protein, essential amino acids, sugars, total fat, essential fatty acids, calcium, and phosphorus. Energy density was calculated. Results from milk replacers were compared with the range of the concentration of each nutrient in milk samples from mature dogs as well as the National Research Council (NRC) recommendations for puppy growth. Results-Milk replacers varied widely in caloric density and concentration of nutrients such as calcium, protein, and fat. Calcium concentration was lower in 14 of 15 milk replacers than in the dog milk samples. Docosahexaenoic acid was undetectable in 12 of 15 milk replacers but present in all dog milk samples. All milk replacers had numerous essential nutrients outside of the range of the dog milk samples, and many had concentrations of amino acids, essential fatty acids, calcium, and phosphorus less than the NRC minimal requirement or recommended allowance. Compared with NRC recommendations, some dog milk samples had concentrations of total protein, linoleic acid, calcium, or phosphorus less than the recommended allowance. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Results suggested that there was substantial variation in nutrient composition of 15 dog milk replacers and that some products were closer approximations of dog milk than others. Nearly all products would benefit from more appropriate calcium, amino acids, and essential fatty acids concentrations and better feeding directions.",
author = "Heinze, {Cailin R.} and Freeman, {Lisa M.} and Martin, {Camilia R.} and Power, {Michael L.} and Fascetti, {Andrea J}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.2460/javma.244.12.1413",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "244",
pages = "1413--1422",
journal = "Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association",
issn = "0003-1488",
publisher = "American Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the nutrient composition of commercial dog milk replacers with that of dog milk

AU - Heinze, Cailin R.

AU - Freeman, Lisa M.

AU - Martin, Camilia R.

AU - Power, Michael L.

AU - Fascetti, Andrea J

PY - 2014/6/15

Y1 - 2014/6/15

N2 - Objective-To compare the nutrient composition of commercially available dog milk replacers with that of dog milk. Design-Prospective, cross-sectional study. Sample-5 dog milk samples and 15 samples of commercial dog milk replacers. Procedures-Dog milk and milk replacers were analyzed for concentrations of total protein, essential amino acids, sugars, total fat, essential fatty acids, calcium, and phosphorus. Energy density was calculated. Results from milk replacers were compared with the range of the concentration of each nutrient in milk samples from mature dogs as well as the National Research Council (NRC) recommendations for puppy growth. Results-Milk replacers varied widely in caloric density and concentration of nutrients such as calcium, protein, and fat. Calcium concentration was lower in 14 of 15 milk replacers than in the dog milk samples. Docosahexaenoic acid was undetectable in 12 of 15 milk replacers but present in all dog milk samples. All milk replacers had numerous essential nutrients outside of the range of the dog milk samples, and many had concentrations of amino acids, essential fatty acids, calcium, and phosphorus less than the NRC minimal requirement or recommended allowance. Compared with NRC recommendations, some dog milk samples had concentrations of total protein, linoleic acid, calcium, or phosphorus less than the recommended allowance. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Results suggested that there was substantial variation in nutrient composition of 15 dog milk replacers and that some products were closer approximations of dog milk than others. Nearly all products would benefit from more appropriate calcium, amino acids, and essential fatty acids concentrations and better feeding directions.

AB - Objective-To compare the nutrient composition of commercially available dog milk replacers with that of dog milk. Design-Prospective, cross-sectional study. Sample-5 dog milk samples and 15 samples of commercial dog milk replacers. Procedures-Dog milk and milk replacers were analyzed for concentrations of total protein, essential amino acids, sugars, total fat, essential fatty acids, calcium, and phosphorus. Energy density was calculated. Results from milk replacers were compared with the range of the concentration of each nutrient in milk samples from mature dogs as well as the National Research Council (NRC) recommendations for puppy growth. Results-Milk replacers varied widely in caloric density and concentration of nutrients such as calcium, protein, and fat. Calcium concentration was lower in 14 of 15 milk replacers than in the dog milk samples. Docosahexaenoic acid was undetectable in 12 of 15 milk replacers but present in all dog milk samples. All milk replacers had numerous essential nutrients outside of the range of the dog milk samples, and many had concentrations of amino acids, essential fatty acids, calcium, and phosphorus less than the NRC minimal requirement or recommended allowance. Compared with NRC recommendations, some dog milk samples had concentrations of total protein, linoleic acid, calcium, or phosphorus less than the recommended allowance. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Results suggested that there was substantial variation in nutrient composition of 15 dog milk replacers and that some products were closer approximations of dog milk than others. Nearly all products would benefit from more appropriate calcium, amino acids, and essential fatty acids concentrations and better feeding directions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901633079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901633079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2460/javma.244.12.1413

DO - 10.2460/javma.244.12.1413

M3 - Article

C2 - 24871064

AN - SCOPUS:84901633079

VL - 244

SP - 1413

EP - 1422

JO - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

JF - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

SN - 0003-1488

IS - 12

ER -