Comparison of surgical site infection rates in clean and clean-contaminated wounds in dogs and cats after minimally invasive versus open surgery

179 cases (2007-2008)

Philipp Mayhew, Lynetta Freeman, Toni Kwan, Dorothy C. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective-To report and compare the surgical site infection (SSI) rates for clean and cleancontaminated procedures performed by either a minimally invasive surgical or open surgical approach in a large population of dogs and cats. Design-Prospective case series. Animals-179 patients (dogs and cats) undergoing minimally invasive abdominal or thoracic surgery. Procedures-Case information from all animals that underwent minimally invasive abdominal or thoracic surgery was prospectively collected and compared with an existing database of the same information collected from 379 patients undergoing laparotomy or thoracotomy via an open surgical approach. For both groups, an SSI was defined as any surgical wound in which purulent discharge was observed within 14 days after the procedure. Follow-up for all patients was obtained by direct examination or telephone interviews. Results-Overall SSI rate in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group was 1.7% and in the open surgery (OS) group was 5.5%. On univariate analysis, there was a significantly lower SSI rate in the MIS group, compared with the SSI rate for the OS group. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, this difference appeared to be a result of the fact that surgery times were longer (median, 105 vs 75 minutes) and hair was clipped ≥ 4 hours prior to surgery for more animals (23% vs 11%) in the OS group, compared with the MIS group. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-MIS may be associated with a lower SSI rate, compared with OS, but confounding factors such as differences in surgery time and preoperative preparation contributed in part to this finding. As such, surgical approach cannot be categorized as an independent risk factor for SSIs in small animals until further studies are performed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-198
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Volume240
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2012

Fingerprint

Surgical Wound Infection
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
animal injuries
Cats
surgery
Dogs
cats
dogs
Wounds and Injuries
infection
Thoracic Surgery
chest
Thoracotomy
Hair
Laparotomy
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Databases
Interviews
animals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

@article{9cd8e8b334634a95b187d343bd04ada7,
title = "Comparison of surgical site infection rates in clean and clean-contaminated wounds in dogs and cats after minimally invasive versus open surgery: 179 cases (2007-2008)",
abstract = "Objective-To report and compare the surgical site infection (SSI) rates for clean and cleancontaminated procedures performed by either a minimally invasive surgical or open surgical approach in a large population of dogs and cats. Design-Prospective case series. Animals-179 patients (dogs and cats) undergoing minimally invasive abdominal or thoracic surgery. Procedures-Case information from all animals that underwent minimally invasive abdominal or thoracic surgery was prospectively collected and compared with an existing database of the same information collected from 379 patients undergoing laparotomy or thoracotomy via an open surgical approach. For both groups, an SSI was defined as any surgical wound in which purulent discharge was observed within 14 days after the procedure. Follow-up for all patients was obtained by direct examination or telephone interviews. Results-Overall SSI rate in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group was 1.7{\%} and in the open surgery (OS) group was 5.5{\%}. On univariate analysis, there was a significantly lower SSI rate in the MIS group, compared with the SSI rate for the OS group. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, this difference appeared to be a result of the fact that surgery times were longer (median, 105 vs 75 minutes) and hair was clipped ≥ 4 hours prior to surgery for more animals (23{\%} vs 11{\%}) in the OS group, compared with the MIS group. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-MIS may be associated with a lower SSI rate, compared with OS, but confounding factors such as differences in surgery time and preoperative preparation contributed in part to this finding. As such, surgical approach cannot be categorized as an independent risk factor for SSIs in small animals until further studies are performed.",
author = "Philipp Mayhew and Lynetta Freeman and Toni Kwan and Brown, {Dorothy C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.2460/javma.240.2.193",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "240",
pages = "193--198",
journal = "Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association",
issn = "0003-1488",
publisher = "American Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of surgical site infection rates in clean and clean-contaminated wounds in dogs and cats after minimally invasive versus open surgery

T2 - 179 cases (2007-2008)

AU - Mayhew, Philipp

AU - Freeman, Lynetta

AU - Kwan, Toni

AU - Brown, Dorothy C.

PY - 2012/1/15

Y1 - 2012/1/15

N2 - Objective-To report and compare the surgical site infection (SSI) rates for clean and cleancontaminated procedures performed by either a minimally invasive surgical or open surgical approach in a large population of dogs and cats. Design-Prospective case series. Animals-179 patients (dogs and cats) undergoing minimally invasive abdominal or thoracic surgery. Procedures-Case information from all animals that underwent minimally invasive abdominal or thoracic surgery was prospectively collected and compared with an existing database of the same information collected from 379 patients undergoing laparotomy or thoracotomy via an open surgical approach. For both groups, an SSI was defined as any surgical wound in which purulent discharge was observed within 14 days after the procedure. Follow-up for all patients was obtained by direct examination or telephone interviews. Results-Overall SSI rate in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group was 1.7% and in the open surgery (OS) group was 5.5%. On univariate analysis, there was a significantly lower SSI rate in the MIS group, compared with the SSI rate for the OS group. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, this difference appeared to be a result of the fact that surgery times were longer (median, 105 vs 75 minutes) and hair was clipped ≥ 4 hours prior to surgery for more animals (23% vs 11%) in the OS group, compared with the MIS group. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-MIS may be associated with a lower SSI rate, compared with OS, but confounding factors such as differences in surgery time and preoperative preparation contributed in part to this finding. As such, surgical approach cannot be categorized as an independent risk factor for SSIs in small animals until further studies are performed.

AB - Objective-To report and compare the surgical site infection (SSI) rates for clean and cleancontaminated procedures performed by either a minimally invasive surgical or open surgical approach in a large population of dogs and cats. Design-Prospective case series. Animals-179 patients (dogs and cats) undergoing minimally invasive abdominal or thoracic surgery. Procedures-Case information from all animals that underwent minimally invasive abdominal or thoracic surgery was prospectively collected and compared with an existing database of the same information collected from 379 patients undergoing laparotomy or thoracotomy via an open surgical approach. For both groups, an SSI was defined as any surgical wound in which purulent discharge was observed within 14 days after the procedure. Follow-up for all patients was obtained by direct examination or telephone interviews. Results-Overall SSI rate in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group was 1.7% and in the open surgery (OS) group was 5.5%. On univariate analysis, there was a significantly lower SSI rate in the MIS group, compared with the SSI rate for the OS group. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, this difference appeared to be a result of the fact that surgery times were longer (median, 105 vs 75 minutes) and hair was clipped ≥ 4 hours prior to surgery for more animals (23% vs 11%) in the OS group, compared with the MIS group. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-MIS may be associated with a lower SSI rate, compared with OS, but confounding factors such as differences in surgery time and preoperative preparation contributed in part to this finding. As such, surgical approach cannot be categorized as an independent risk factor for SSIs in small animals until further studies are performed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855484640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855484640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2460/javma.240.2.193

DO - 10.2460/javma.240.2.193

M3 - Article

VL - 240

SP - 193

EP - 198

JO - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

JF - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

SN - 0003-1488

IS - 2

ER -