Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty

Derek F. Amanatullah; Joshua Landa; Eric J. Strauss; Jonathan P. Garino; Sunny H Kim; Paul E. Di Cesare

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.032

Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty

Derek F. Amanatullah, Joshua Landa, Eric J. Strauss, Jonathan P. Garino, Sunny H Kim, Paul E. Di Cesare

Public Health Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

The results of a prospective multicenter trial comparing 357 hips randomized to total hip arthroplasty with either ceramic-ceramic or ceramic-polyethylene couplings are presented. No statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes scores between the ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene groups was observed at any time interval. The mean linear rate was statistically lower (P <.001) in the ceramic-ceramic group (30.5 μm/year) when compared with the ceramic-polyethylene group (218.2 μm/year). The rates of ceramic implant fracture (2.6%) and audible component-related noise (3.1%) were statistically higher in the ceramic-ceramic group when compared with the ceramic-polyethylene group (P < .05). Lastly, there was no statistically significant difference in the dislocation or revision rate between the groups at the time of last clinical follow-up.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	72-77
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume	26
Issue number	SUPPL. 6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.032
State	Published - Sep 2011

Keywords

Ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations
Implant wear
Total hip arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Access to Document

10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.032

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Amanatullah, D. F., Landa, J., Strauss, E. J., Garino, J. P., Kim, S. H., & Di Cesare, P. E. (2011). Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty, 26(SUPPL. 6), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.032

Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty. / Amanatullah, Derek F.; Landa, Joshua; Strauss, Eric J.; Garino, Jonathan P.; Kim, Sunny H; Di Cesare, Paul E.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 26, No. SUPPL. 6, 09.2011, p. 72-77.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

@article{79e7af2affa64c89a14a5ae208580bfd,

title = "Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty",

abstract = "The results of a prospective multicenter trial comparing 357 hips randomized to total hip arthroplasty with either ceramic-ceramic or ceramic-polyethylene couplings are presented. No statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes scores between the ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene groups was observed at any time interval. The mean linear rate was statistically lower (P <.001) in the ceramic-ceramic group (30.5 μm/year) when compared with the ceramic-polyethylene group (218.2 μm/year). The rates of ceramic implant fracture (2.6%) and audible component-related noise (3.1%) were statistically higher in the ceramic-ceramic group when compared with the ceramic-polyethylene group (P < .05). Lastly, there was no statistically significant difference in the dislocation or revision rate between the groups at the time of last clinical follow-up.",

keywords = "Ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations, Implant wear, Total hip arthroplasty",

author = "Amanatullah, {Derek F.} and Joshua Landa and Strauss, {Eric J.} and Garino, {Jonathan P.} and Kim, {Sunny H} and {Di Cesare}, {Paul E.}",

year = "2011",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.032",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "26",

pages = "72--77",

journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",

issn = "0883-5403",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

number = "SUPPL. 6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty

AU - Amanatullah, Derek F.

AU - Landa, Joshua

AU - Strauss, Eric J.

AU - Garino, Jonathan P.

AU - Kim, Sunny H

AU - Di Cesare, Paul E.

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - The results of a prospective multicenter trial comparing 357 hips randomized to total hip arthroplasty with either ceramic-ceramic or ceramic-polyethylene couplings are presented. No statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes scores between the ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene groups was observed at any time interval. The mean linear rate was statistically lower (P <.001) in the ceramic-ceramic group (30.5 μm/year) when compared with the ceramic-polyethylene group (218.2 μm/year). The rates of ceramic implant fracture (2.6%) and audible component-related noise (3.1%) were statistically higher in the ceramic-ceramic group when compared with the ceramic-polyethylene group (P < .05). Lastly, there was no statistically significant difference in the dislocation or revision rate between the groups at the time of last clinical follow-up.

AB - The results of a prospective multicenter trial comparing 357 hips randomized to total hip arthroplasty with either ceramic-ceramic or ceramic-polyethylene couplings are presented. No statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes scores between the ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene groups was observed at any time interval. The mean linear rate was statistically lower (P <.001) in the ceramic-ceramic group (30.5 μm/year) when compared with the ceramic-polyethylene group (218.2 μm/year). The rates of ceramic implant fracture (2.6%) and audible component-related noise (3.1%) were statistically higher in the ceramic-ceramic group when compared with the ceramic-polyethylene group (P < .05). Lastly, there was no statistically significant difference in the dislocation or revision rate between the groups at the time of last clinical follow-up.

KW - Ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations

KW - Implant wear

KW - Total hip arthroplasty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868302646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868302646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.032

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.032

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84868302646

VL - 26

SP - 72

EP - 77

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - SUPPL. 6

ER -