Comparison of recombinant cell bioassays for the detection of Ah receptor agonists

Dalho Han, Scott R. Nagy, Michael S. Denison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we have compared the time and dose response curves for TCDD using the pGudLuc1.1-chemically activated luciferase expression (CALUX) cell bioassay and two new recombinant cell lines that contain a stably transfected mutated form of firefly luciferase reporter gene (pGudLuc6.1) or enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene (pGreen1.1). The time course of induction with pGudLuc1.1-containing H1L1.1c2 cells is transient, with maximal activity observed at 4 hours after treatment with 1 nM TCDD. In contrast, expression of luciferase from the pGudLuc6.1-containing H1L6.1c2 cells and the pGreen1.1-containing H1G1.1c3 cells progressively increases with time, with luciferase activity increasing at a significant faster rate than that of EGFP. Dose response analysis with each cell line at optimal analysis times reveal similar relative dose response curves and EC50s for H1L6.1c2 and H1G1.1c3 cells, while the EC50 for TCDD in the H1L1.1c2 cells was about 7-fold lower. In addition, these bioassay systems respond to halogenated and/or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a dose-specific manner. Given the above differences between cell lines and reporters, the choice of which cell line to use will certainly be dependent on the specific questions and issues being examined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-22
Number of pages12
JournalBioFactors
Volume20
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Bioassay
Biological Assay
Luciferases
Cells
Cell Line
Genes
Firefly Luciferases
Reporter Genes
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
enhanced green fluorescent protein
Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins

Keywords

  • Ah receptor agonists
  • CALUX
  • Cell bioassay
  • EGFP
  • TCDD

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Han, D., Nagy, S. R., & Denison, M. S. (2004). Comparison of recombinant cell bioassays for the detection of Ah receptor agonists. BioFactors, 20(1), 11-22.

Comparison of recombinant cell bioassays for the detection of Ah receptor agonists. / Han, Dalho; Nagy, Scott R.; Denison, Michael S.

In: BioFactors, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2004, p. 11-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Han, D, Nagy, SR & Denison, MS 2004, 'Comparison of recombinant cell bioassays for the detection of Ah receptor agonists', BioFactors, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 11-22.
Han, Dalho ; Nagy, Scott R. ; Denison, Michael S. / Comparison of recombinant cell bioassays for the detection of Ah receptor agonists. In: BioFactors. 2004 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 11-22.
@article{2f5acc650d614804b930f01ea0bd4dd0,
title = "Comparison of recombinant cell bioassays for the detection of Ah receptor agonists",
abstract = "In this study, we have compared the time and dose response curves for TCDD using the pGudLuc1.1-chemically activated luciferase expression (CALUX) cell bioassay and two new recombinant cell lines that contain a stably transfected mutated form of firefly luciferase reporter gene (pGudLuc6.1) or enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene (pGreen1.1). The time course of induction with pGudLuc1.1-containing H1L1.1c2 cells is transient, with maximal activity observed at 4 hours after treatment with 1 nM TCDD. In contrast, expression of luciferase from the pGudLuc6.1-containing H1L6.1c2 cells and the pGreen1.1-containing H1G1.1c3 cells progressively increases with time, with luciferase activity increasing at a significant faster rate than that of EGFP. Dose response analysis with each cell line at optimal analysis times reveal similar relative dose response curves and EC50s for H1L6.1c2 and H1G1.1c3 cells, while the EC50 for TCDD in the H1L1.1c2 cells was about 7-fold lower. In addition, these bioassay systems respond to halogenated and/or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a dose-specific manner. Given the above differences between cell lines and reporters, the choice of which cell line to use will certainly be dependent on the specific questions and issues being examined.",
keywords = "Ah receptor agonists, CALUX, Cell bioassay, EGFP, TCDD",
author = "Dalho Han and Nagy, {Scott R.} and Denison, {Michael S.}",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "11--22",
journal = "BioFactors",
issn = "0951-6433",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of recombinant cell bioassays for the detection of Ah receptor agonists

AU - Han, Dalho

AU - Nagy, Scott R.

AU - Denison, Michael S.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - In this study, we have compared the time and dose response curves for TCDD using the pGudLuc1.1-chemically activated luciferase expression (CALUX) cell bioassay and two new recombinant cell lines that contain a stably transfected mutated form of firefly luciferase reporter gene (pGudLuc6.1) or enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene (pGreen1.1). The time course of induction with pGudLuc1.1-containing H1L1.1c2 cells is transient, with maximal activity observed at 4 hours after treatment with 1 nM TCDD. In contrast, expression of luciferase from the pGudLuc6.1-containing H1L6.1c2 cells and the pGreen1.1-containing H1G1.1c3 cells progressively increases with time, with luciferase activity increasing at a significant faster rate than that of EGFP. Dose response analysis with each cell line at optimal analysis times reveal similar relative dose response curves and EC50s for H1L6.1c2 and H1G1.1c3 cells, while the EC50 for TCDD in the H1L1.1c2 cells was about 7-fold lower. In addition, these bioassay systems respond to halogenated and/or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a dose-specific manner. Given the above differences between cell lines and reporters, the choice of which cell line to use will certainly be dependent on the specific questions and issues being examined.

AB - In this study, we have compared the time and dose response curves for TCDD using the pGudLuc1.1-chemically activated luciferase expression (CALUX) cell bioassay and two new recombinant cell lines that contain a stably transfected mutated form of firefly luciferase reporter gene (pGudLuc6.1) or enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene (pGreen1.1). The time course of induction with pGudLuc1.1-containing H1L1.1c2 cells is transient, with maximal activity observed at 4 hours after treatment with 1 nM TCDD. In contrast, expression of luciferase from the pGudLuc6.1-containing H1L6.1c2 cells and the pGreen1.1-containing H1G1.1c3 cells progressively increases with time, with luciferase activity increasing at a significant faster rate than that of EGFP. Dose response analysis with each cell line at optimal analysis times reveal similar relative dose response curves and EC50s for H1L6.1c2 and H1G1.1c3 cells, while the EC50 for TCDD in the H1L1.1c2 cells was about 7-fold lower. In addition, these bioassay systems respond to halogenated and/or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a dose-specific manner. Given the above differences between cell lines and reporters, the choice of which cell line to use will certainly be dependent on the specific questions and issues being examined.

KW - Ah receptor agonists

KW - CALUX

KW - Cell bioassay

KW - EGFP

KW - TCDD

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342489432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342489432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 11

EP - 22

JO - BioFactors

JF - BioFactors

SN - 0951-6433

IS - 1

ER -