Comparison of newborn hearing screening by transient otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response using ALGO-2®

Karen Jo Doyle, Sharon Fujikawa, Paula Rogers, Erin Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare pass rates for two different hearing screening methods in well newborns as a function of age. A previous study by this group compared click evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) using the ALGO-1® infant hearing screener (Natus Medical, Foster City, CA). Since that study, a new generation automated ABR screener, the ALGO-2®, has been developed. In this study, 232 ears in 116 healthy newborn infants aged 5-48 h were tested using the ALGO-2 screener and EOAE. Overall, 92% of ears passed the ABR, while 57% passed the EOAE screen. The ABR pass rate was higher than in the previous study, where 88.5% of ears passed the ABR screen using ALGO-1. The EOAE pass rate in the present study was lower than in the previous study, in which 79% passed the EOAE screen. Pass rates for both EOAE and ABR improved significantly with increasing infant age. There was no significant difference in the test time required for ALGO-2 (5.7 min) compared with EOAE (5.2 min). The results are compared with earlier studies and implications for universal hearing screening are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-211
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 1998

Fingerprint

Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Hearing
Newborn Infant
Ear

Keywords

  • Auditory brainstem response
  • Hearing loss
  • Otoacoustic emissions
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Comparison of newborn hearing screening by transient otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response using ALGO-2®. / Doyle, Karen Jo; Fujikawa, Sharon; Rogers, Paula; Newman, Erin.

In: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Vol. 43, No. 3, 15.05.1998, p. 207-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0de5aa26b2a34994a373cad3caefac43,
title = "Comparison of newborn hearing screening by transient otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response using ALGO-2{\circledR}",
abstract = "The aim of this study is to compare pass rates for two different hearing screening methods in well newborns as a function of age. A previous study by this group compared click evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) using the ALGO-1{\circledR} infant hearing screener (Natus Medical, Foster City, CA). Since that study, a new generation automated ABR screener, the ALGO-2{\circledR}, has been developed. In this study, 232 ears in 116 healthy newborn infants aged 5-48 h were tested using the ALGO-2 screener and EOAE. Overall, 92{\%} of ears passed the ABR, while 57{\%} passed the EOAE screen. The ABR pass rate was higher than in the previous study, where 88.5{\%} of ears passed the ABR screen using ALGO-1. The EOAE pass rate in the present study was lower than in the previous study, in which 79{\%} passed the EOAE screen. Pass rates for both EOAE and ABR improved significantly with increasing infant age. There was no significant difference in the test time required for ALGO-2 (5.7 min) compared with EOAE (5.2 min). The results are compared with earlier studies and implications for universal hearing screening are discussed.",
keywords = "Auditory brainstem response, Hearing loss, Otoacoustic emissions, Screening",
author = "Doyle, {Karen Jo} and Sharon Fujikawa and Paula Rogers and Erin Newman",
year = "1998",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/S0165-5876(98)00007-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "207--211",
journal = "International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology",
issn = "0165-5876",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of newborn hearing screening by transient otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response using ALGO-2®

AU - Doyle, Karen Jo

AU - Fujikawa, Sharon

AU - Rogers, Paula

AU - Newman, Erin

PY - 1998/5/15

Y1 - 1998/5/15

N2 - The aim of this study is to compare pass rates for two different hearing screening methods in well newborns as a function of age. A previous study by this group compared click evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) using the ALGO-1® infant hearing screener (Natus Medical, Foster City, CA). Since that study, a new generation automated ABR screener, the ALGO-2®, has been developed. In this study, 232 ears in 116 healthy newborn infants aged 5-48 h were tested using the ALGO-2 screener and EOAE. Overall, 92% of ears passed the ABR, while 57% passed the EOAE screen. The ABR pass rate was higher than in the previous study, where 88.5% of ears passed the ABR screen using ALGO-1. The EOAE pass rate in the present study was lower than in the previous study, in which 79% passed the EOAE screen. Pass rates for both EOAE and ABR improved significantly with increasing infant age. There was no significant difference in the test time required for ALGO-2 (5.7 min) compared with EOAE (5.2 min). The results are compared with earlier studies and implications for universal hearing screening are discussed.

AB - The aim of this study is to compare pass rates for two different hearing screening methods in well newborns as a function of age. A previous study by this group compared click evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) using the ALGO-1® infant hearing screener (Natus Medical, Foster City, CA). Since that study, a new generation automated ABR screener, the ALGO-2®, has been developed. In this study, 232 ears in 116 healthy newborn infants aged 5-48 h were tested using the ALGO-2 screener and EOAE. Overall, 92% of ears passed the ABR, while 57% passed the EOAE screen. The ABR pass rate was higher than in the previous study, where 88.5% of ears passed the ABR screen using ALGO-1. The EOAE pass rate in the present study was lower than in the previous study, in which 79% passed the EOAE screen. Pass rates for both EOAE and ABR improved significantly with increasing infant age. There was no significant difference in the test time required for ALGO-2 (5.7 min) compared with EOAE (5.2 min). The results are compared with earlier studies and implications for universal hearing screening are discussed.

KW - Auditory brainstem response

KW - Hearing loss

KW - Otoacoustic emissions

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031805984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031805984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0165-5876(98)00007-X

DO - 10.1016/S0165-5876(98)00007-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 9663941

AN - SCOPUS:0031805984

VL - 43

SP - 207

EP - 211

JO - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

JF - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

SN - 0165-5876

IS - 3

ER -