Comparison of methods to assess dog owners' therapeutic compliance

Linda S Barter, J. E. Maddison, A. D J Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare different methods for assessing the compliance of veterinary clients administering medication to their dogs. Procedure: Thirty-one owners whose dogs were prescribed amoxycillin-clavulanate, twice and thrice daily, for a duration of five to seven days were recruited from three Sydney veterinary hospitals. Compliance was assessed by electronic monitoring devices, return medication counts, client self-reports and veterinarians' estimation of likely compliance. Results: Electronic monitoring showed owners administered on average 84% (range 7 to 104%) of prescribed medication to their dogs. Both return medication counts and client self-reports tended to overestimate therapeutic compliance when compared with electronic monitoring. When questioned, the majority of owners (71%) claimed perfect compliance with the prescribed regimen. No correlation was found between veterinarians' estimates of owner compliance and that assessed electronically. Conclusion: Electronic monitoring provided valuable information on dose timing and variation, but proved costly and difficult to employ in veterinary practice. Simplicity and low cost of return medication counts makes this method attractive for use in veterinary compliance studies. Client self-reports reliably detected some noncompliers and permitted identification of individual problems or errors. For practical purposes a combination of return medication counts and client self-reports may have merit in future veterinary compliance studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-446
Number of pages4
JournalAustralian Veterinary Journal
Volume74
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

compliance
Compliance
Dogs
drug therapy
therapeutics
Self Report
dogs
electronics
Veterinarians
monitoring
Therapeutics
methodology
veterinarians
Animal Hospitals
Clavulanic Acid
Amoxicillin
veterinary clinics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
duration

Keywords

  • Compliance assessment
  • Compliance estimation
  • Electronic monitoring
  • Medication counts
  • Self-reports
  • Therapeutic compliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Comparison of methods to assess dog owners' therapeutic compliance. / Barter, Linda S; Maddison, J. E.; Watson, A. D J.

In: Australian Veterinary Journal, Vol. 74, No. 6, 12.1996, p. 443-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barter, Linda S ; Maddison, J. E. ; Watson, A. D J. / Comparison of methods to assess dog owners' therapeutic compliance. In: Australian Veterinary Journal. 1996 ; Vol. 74, No. 6. pp. 443-446.
@article{7a303720b5d946a6b599a746a92ac9df,
title = "Comparison of methods to assess dog owners' therapeutic compliance",
abstract = "Objective: To compare different methods for assessing the compliance of veterinary clients administering medication to their dogs. Procedure: Thirty-one owners whose dogs were prescribed amoxycillin-clavulanate, twice and thrice daily, for a duration of five to seven days were recruited from three Sydney veterinary hospitals. Compliance was assessed by electronic monitoring devices, return medication counts, client self-reports and veterinarians' estimation of likely compliance. Results: Electronic monitoring showed owners administered on average 84{\%} (range 7 to 104{\%}) of prescribed medication to their dogs. Both return medication counts and client self-reports tended to overestimate therapeutic compliance when compared with electronic monitoring. When questioned, the majority of owners (71{\%}) claimed perfect compliance with the prescribed regimen. No correlation was found between veterinarians' estimates of owner compliance and that assessed electronically. Conclusion: Electronic monitoring provided valuable information on dose timing and variation, but proved costly and difficult to employ in veterinary practice. Simplicity and low cost of return medication counts makes this method attractive for use in veterinary compliance studies. Client self-reports reliably detected some noncompliers and permitted identification of individual problems or errors. For practical purposes a combination of return medication counts and client self-reports may have merit in future veterinary compliance studies.",
keywords = "Compliance assessment, Compliance estimation, Electronic monitoring, Medication counts, Self-reports, Therapeutic compliance",
author = "Barter, {Linda S} and Maddison, {J. E.} and Watson, {A. D J}",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "443--446",
journal = "Australian Veterinary Journal",
issn = "0005-0423",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of methods to assess dog owners' therapeutic compliance

AU - Barter, Linda S

AU - Maddison, J. E.

AU - Watson, A. D J

PY - 1996/12

Y1 - 1996/12

N2 - Objective: To compare different methods for assessing the compliance of veterinary clients administering medication to their dogs. Procedure: Thirty-one owners whose dogs were prescribed amoxycillin-clavulanate, twice and thrice daily, for a duration of five to seven days were recruited from three Sydney veterinary hospitals. Compliance was assessed by electronic monitoring devices, return medication counts, client self-reports and veterinarians' estimation of likely compliance. Results: Electronic monitoring showed owners administered on average 84% (range 7 to 104%) of prescribed medication to their dogs. Both return medication counts and client self-reports tended to overestimate therapeutic compliance when compared with electronic monitoring. When questioned, the majority of owners (71%) claimed perfect compliance with the prescribed regimen. No correlation was found between veterinarians' estimates of owner compliance and that assessed electronically. Conclusion: Electronic monitoring provided valuable information on dose timing and variation, but proved costly and difficult to employ in veterinary practice. Simplicity and low cost of return medication counts makes this method attractive for use in veterinary compliance studies. Client self-reports reliably detected some noncompliers and permitted identification of individual problems or errors. For practical purposes a combination of return medication counts and client self-reports may have merit in future veterinary compliance studies.

AB - Objective: To compare different methods for assessing the compliance of veterinary clients administering medication to their dogs. Procedure: Thirty-one owners whose dogs were prescribed amoxycillin-clavulanate, twice and thrice daily, for a duration of five to seven days were recruited from three Sydney veterinary hospitals. Compliance was assessed by electronic monitoring devices, return medication counts, client self-reports and veterinarians' estimation of likely compliance. Results: Electronic monitoring showed owners administered on average 84% (range 7 to 104%) of prescribed medication to their dogs. Both return medication counts and client self-reports tended to overestimate therapeutic compliance when compared with electronic monitoring. When questioned, the majority of owners (71%) claimed perfect compliance with the prescribed regimen. No correlation was found between veterinarians' estimates of owner compliance and that assessed electronically. Conclusion: Electronic monitoring provided valuable information on dose timing and variation, but proved costly and difficult to employ in veterinary practice. Simplicity and low cost of return medication counts makes this method attractive for use in veterinary compliance studies. Client self-reports reliably detected some noncompliers and permitted identification of individual problems or errors. For practical purposes a combination of return medication counts and client self-reports may have merit in future veterinary compliance studies.

KW - Compliance assessment

KW - Compliance estimation

KW - Electronic monitoring

KW - Medication counts

KW - Self-reports

KW - Therapeutic compliance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030340212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030340212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 443

EP - 446

JO - Australian Veterinary Journal

JF - Australian Veterinary Journal

SN - 0005-0423

IS - 6

ER -