Comparison of methods for identifying a population-based sample of Filipina women for a health survey

Katherine J. Hoggatt, Susan L Stewart, Rena Pasick, Fabio Sabogal, Noe Tuason, Melen R. McBride, Grace Villarin Duenas, Pamela L. Horn-Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes and compares 2 random-digit dialing (RDD) methods that have been used to select minority subjects for population-based research. These methods encompass the census-based method, which draws its primary sampling units from census tracts with a high proportion of minority persons, and the registry-based method, which derives its primary sampling units from a population-based cancer registry. Our study targeted Filipinos living in 10 Northern California counties, where they constitute 4% of the total population. Eligible participants (Filipina women, at least aged 20, who spoke 1 of 4 interview languages) were asked to complete a short telephone interview. Both the census and registry methods located Filipino households with comparable efficiency and with a higher yield than would be expected in a non-targeted population survey, such as the Mitofsky-Waksberg RDD method. No systematic pattern of responses was evident that would indicate that either method sampled women who were systematically less acculturated or less likely to use cancer screening tests. Although both methods offer substantial gains in efficiency, their utility is limited by generating samples that tend to over-represent high-density areas. The degree to which these methods are considered viable depends on further refinement to limit, or eliminate, their inherent selection biases without sacrificing their increased efficiency to locate minority populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-25
Number of pages5
JournalEthnicity and Disease
Volume14
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Women's Health
Health Surveys
Population
Censuses
Registries
Interviews
Selection Bias
Early Detection of Cancer
Language
Research
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Cancer registry
  • Census
  • Efficiency
  • Methods
  • Minority population
  • Population-based study
  • Random digit-dialing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Hoggatt, K. J., Stewart, S. L., Pasick, R., Sabogal, F., Tuason, N., McBride, M. R., ... Horn-Ross, P. L. (2004). Comparison of methods for identifying a population-based sample of Filipina women for a health survey. Ethnicity and Disease, 14(1), 21-25.

Comparison of methods for identifying a population-based sample of Filipina women for a health survey. / Hoggatt, Katherine J.; Stewart, Susan L; Pasick, Rena; Sabogal, Fabio; Tuason, Noe; McBride, Melen R.; Duenas, Grace Villarin; Horn-Ross, Pamela L.

In: Ethnicity and Disease, Vol. 14, No. 1, 12.2004, p. 21-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hoggatt, KJ, Stewart, SL, Pasick, R, Sabogal, F, Tuason, N, McBride, MR, Duenas, GV & Horn-Ross, PL 2004, 'Comparison of methods for identifying a population-based sample of Filipina women for a health survey', Ethnicity and Disease, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 21-25.
Hoggatt, Katherine J. ; Stewart, Susan L ; Pasick, Rena ; Sabogal, Fabio ; Tuason, Noe ; McBride, Melen R. ; Duenas, Grace Villarin ; Horn-Ross, Pamela L. / Comparison of methods for identifying a population-based sample of Filipina women for a health survey. In: Ethnicity and Disease. 2004 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 21-25.
@article{75a16b6a4ca240b2a2ee657b037ed85d,
title = "Comparison of methods for identifying a population-based sample of Filipina women for a health survey",
abstract = "This paper describes and compares 2 random-digit dialing (RDD) methods that have been used to select minority subjects for population-based research. These methods encompass the census-based method, which draws its primary sampling units from census tracts with a high proportion of minority persons, and the registry-based method, which derives its primary sampling units from a population-based cancer registry. Our study targeted Filipinos living in 10 Northern California counties, where they constitute 4{\%} of the total population. Eligible participants (Filipina women, at least aged 20, who spoke 1 of 4 interview languages) were asked to complete a short telephone interview. Both the census and registry methods located Filipino households with comparable efficiency and with a higher yield than would be expected in a non-targeted population survey, such as the Mitofsky-Waksberg RDD method. No systematic pattern of responses was evident that would indicate that either method sampled women who were systematically less acculturated or less likely to use cancer screening tests. Although both methods offer substantial gains in efficiency, their utility is limited by generating samples that tend to over-represent high-density areas. The degree to which these methods are considered viable depends on further refinement to limit, or eliminate, their inherent selection biases without sacrificing their increased efficiency to locate minority populations.",
keywords = "Bias, Cancer registry, Census, Efficiency, Methods, Minority population, Population-based study, Random digit-dialing",
author = "Hoggatt, {Katherine J.} and Stewart, {Susan L} and Rena Pasick and Fabio Sabogal and Noe Tuason and McBride, {Melen R.} and Duenas, {Grace Villarin} and Horn-Ross, {Pamela L.}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "21--25",
journal = "Ethnicity and Disease",
issn = "1049-510X",
publisher = "ISHIB",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of methods for identifying a population-based sample of Filipina women for a health survey

AU - Hoggatt, Katherine J.

AU - Stewart, Susan L

AU - Pasick, Rena

AU - Sabogal, Fabio

AU - Tuason, Noe

AU - McBride, Melen R.

AU - Duenas, Grace Villarin

AU - Horn-Ross, Pamela L.

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - This paper describes and compares 2 random-digit dialing (RDD) methods that have been used to select minority subjects for population-based research. These methods encompass the census-based method, which draws its primary sampling units from census tracts with a high proportion of minority persons, and the registry-based method, which derives its primary sampling units from a population-based cancer registry. Our study targeted Filipinos living in 10 Northern California counties, where they constitute 4% of the total population. Eligible participants (Filipina women, at least aged 20, who spoke 1 of 4 interview languages) were asked to complete a short telephone interview. Both the census and registry methods located Filipino households with comparable efficiency and with a higher yield than would be expected in a non-targeted population survey, such as the Mitofsky-Waksberg RDD method. No systematic pattern of responses was evident that would indicate that either method sampled women who were systematically less acculturated or less likely to use cancer screening tests. Although both methods offer substantial gains in efficiency, their utility is limited by generating samples that tend to over-represent high-density areas. The degree to which these methods are considered viable depends on further refinement to limit, or eliminate, their inherent selection biases without sacrificing their increased efficiency to locate minority populations.

AB - This paper describes and compares 2 random-digit dialing (RDD) methods that have been used to select minority subjects for population-based research. These methods encompass the census-based method, which draws its primary sampling units from census tracts with a high proportion of minority persons, and the registry-based method, which derives its primary sampling units from a population-based cancer registry. Our study targeted Filipinos living in 10 Northern California counties, where they constitute 4% of the total population. Eligible participants (Filipina women, at least aged 20, who spoke 1 of 4 interview languages) were asked to complete a short telephone interview. Both the census and registry methods located Filipino households with comparable efficiency and with a higher yield than would be expected in a non-targeted population survey, such as the Mitofsky-Waksberg RDD method. No systematic pattern of responses was evident that would indicate that either method sampled women who were systematically less acculturated or less likely to use cancer screening tests. Although both methods offer substantial gains in efficiency, their utility is limited by generating samples that tend to over-represent high-density areas. The degree to which these methods are considered viable depends on further refinement to limit, or eliminate, their inherent selection biases without sacrificing their increased efficiency to locate minority populations.

KW - Bias

KW - Cancer registry

KW - Census

KW - Efficiency

KW - Methods

KW - Minority population

KW - Population-based study

KW - Random digit-dialing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1342309315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1342309315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 21

EP - 25

JO - Ethnicity and Disease

JF - Ethnicity and Disease

SN - 1049-510X

IS - 1

ER -