Comparison of measurements obtained by use of an electrogoniometer and a universal plastic goniometer for the assessment of joint motion in dogs

Todd M. Thomas, Denis J Marcellin-Little, Simon C. Roe, B. Duncan X Lascelles, Bess P. Brosey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective - To compare measurements obtained by use of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and an electrogoniometer (EG) and from radiographs and to compare joint motion in German Shepherd Dogs and Labrador Retrievers. Animals - 12 healthy adult German Shepherd Dogs and data previously collected from 16 healthy adult Labrador Retrievers. Procedures - German Shepherd Dogs were sedated. One investigator then measured motion of the carpal, cubital (elbow), shoulder, tarsal, stifle, and hip joints of the sedated dogs. Measurements were made in triplicate with a UG and an EG. Radiographs were taken of all joints in maximal flexion and extension. Values were compared between the UG and EG and with values previously determined for joints of 16 Labrador Retrievers. Results - An EG had higher variability than a UG for all dogs. The EG variability appeared to result from the technique for the EG. German Shepherd Dogs had lower values in flexion and extension than did Labrador Retrievers for all joints, except the carpal joints. German Shepherd Dogs had less motion in the tarsal joints, compared with motion for the Labrador Retrievers, but had similar motion in all other joints. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - A UG is reliable for obtaining measurements in German Shepherd Dogs. There was higher variability for the EG than for the UG, and an EG cannot be recommended for use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1974-1979
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research
Volume67
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Plastics
German Shepherd
joints (animal)
Newfoundland and Labrador
plastics
Joints
Labrador Retriever
Dogs
dogs
Tarsal Joints
Carpal Joints
Stifle
elbows
Hip Joint
Elbow
hips
Wrist
shoulders
Research Personnel
animals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Comparison of measurements obtained by use of an electrogoniometer and a universal plastic goniometer for the assessment of joint motion in dogs. / Thomas, Todd M.; Marcellin-Little, Denis J; Roe, Simon C.; Lascelles, B. Duncan X; Brosey, Bess P.

In: American Journal of Veterinary Research, Vol. 67, No. 12, 01.12.2006, p. 1974-1979.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{556353ec5b2943269bb6646b0b9faede,
title = "Comparison of measurements obtained by use of an electrogoniometer and a universal plastic goniometer for the assessment of joint motion in dogs",
abstract = "Objective - To compare measurements obtained by use of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and an electrogoniometer (EG) and from radiographs and to compare joint motion in German Shepherd Dogs and Labrador Retrievers. Animals - 12 healthy adult German Shepherd Dogs and data previously collected from 16 healthy adult Labrador Retrievers. Procedures - German Shepherd Dogs were sedated. One investigator then measured motion of the carpal, cubital (elbow), shoulder, tarsal, stifle, and hip joints of the sedated dogs. Measurements were made in triplicate with a UG and an EG. Radiographs were taken of all joints in maximal flexion and extension. Values were compared between the UG and EG and with values previously determined for joints of 16 Labrador Retrievers. Results - An EG had higher variability than a UG for all dogs. The EG variability appeared to result from the technique for the EG. German Shepherd Dogs had lower values in flexion and extension than did Labrador Retrievers for all joints, except the carpal joints. German Shepherd Dogs had less motion in the tarsal joints, compared with motion for the Labrador Retrievers, but had similar motion in all other joints. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - A UG is reliable for obtaining measurements in German Shepherd Dogs. There was higher variability for the EG than for the UG, and an EG cannot be recommended for use.",
author = "Thomas, {Todd M.} and Marcellin-Little, {Denis J} and Roe, {Simon C.} and Lascelles, {B. Duncan X} and Brosey, {Bess P.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2460/ajvr.67.12.1974",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "1974--1979",
journal = "American Journal of Veterinary Research",
issn = "0002-9645",
publisher = "American Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of measurements obtained by use of an electrogoniometer and a universal plastic goniometer for the assessment of joint motion in dogs

AU - Thomas, Todd M.

AU - Marcellin-Little, Denis J

AU - Roe, Simon C.

AU - Lascelles, B. Duncan X

AU - Brosey, Bess P.

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Objective - To compare measurements obtained by use of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and an electrogoniometer (EG) and from radiographs and to compare joint motion in German Shepherd Dogs and Labrador Retrievers. Animals - 12 healthy adult German Shepherd Dogs and data previously collected from 16 healthy adult Labrador Retrievers. Procedures - German Shepherd Dogs were sedated. One investigator then measured motion of the carpal, cubital (elbow), shoulder, tarsal, stifle, and hip joints of the sedated dogs. Measurements were made in triplicate with a UG and an EG. Radiographs were taken of all joints in maximal flexion and extension. Values were compared between the UG and EG and with values previously determined for joints of 16 Labrador Retrievers. Results - An EG had higher variability than a UG for all dogs. The EG variability appeared to result from the technique for the EG. German Shepherd Dogs had lower values in flexion and extension than did Labrador Retrievers for all joints, except the carpal joints. German Shepherd Dogs had less motion in the tarsal joints, compared with motion for the Labrador Retrievers, but had similar motion in all other joints. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - A UG is reliable for obtaining measurements in German Shepherd Dogs. There was higher variability for the EG than for the UG, and an EG cannot be recommended for use.

AB - Objective - To compare measurements obtained by use of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and an electrogoniometer (EG) and from radiographs and to compare joint motion in German Shepherd Dogs and Labrador Retrievers. Animals - 12 healthy adult German Shepherd Dogs and data previously collected from 16 healthy adult Labrador Retrievers. Procedures - German Shepherd Dogs were sedated. One investigator then measured motion of the carpal, cubital (elbow), shoulder, tarsal, stifle, and hip joints of the sedated dogs. Measurements were made in triplicate with a UG and an EG. Radiographs were taken of all joints in maximal flexion and extension. Values were compared between the UG and EG and with values previously determined for joints of 16 Labrador Retrievers. Results - An EG had higher variability than a UG for all dogs. The EG variability appeared to result from the technique for the EG. German Shepherd Dogs had lower values in flexion and extension than did Labrador Retrievers for all joints, except the carpal joints. German Shepherd Dogs had less motion in the tarsal joints, compared with motion for the Labrador Retrievers, but had similar motion in all other joints. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - A UG is reliable for obtaining measurements in German Shepherd Dogs. There was higher variability for the EG than for the UG, and an EG cannot be recommended for use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846014689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846014689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2460/ajvr.67.12.1974

DO - 10.2460/ajvr.67.12.1974

M3 - Article

C2 - 17144796

AN - SCOPUS:33846014689

VL - 67

SP - 1974

EP - 1979

JO - American Journal of Veterinary Research

JF - American Journal of Veterinary Research

SN - 0002-9645

IS - 12

ER -