TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Interviewer-Administered and Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recalls in 3 Diverse Integrated Health Systems
AU - Thompson, Frances E.
AU - Dixit-Joshi, Sujata
AU - Potischman, Nancy
AU - Dodd, Kevin W.
AU - Kirkpatrick, Sharon I.
AU - Kushi, Lawrence H.
AU - Alexander, Gwen L.
AU - Coleman, Laura A.
AU - Zimmerman, Thea P.
AU - Sundaram, Maria E.
AU - Clancy, Heather A.
AU - Groesbeck, Michelle
AU - Douglass, Deirdre
AU - George, Stephanie M.
AU - Schap, Tusarebecca E.
AU - Subar, Amy F.
PY - 2015/6/15
Y1 - 2015/6/15
N2 - Twenty-four-hour dietary recalls provide high-quality intake data but have been prohibitively expensive for large epidemiologic studies. This study's goal was to assess whether the web-based Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Recall (ASA24) performs similarly enough to the standard interviewer-administered, Automated Multiple-Pass Method (AMPM) 24-hour dietary recall to be considered a viable alternative. In 2010-2011, 1,081 adults from 3 integrated health systems in Detroit, Michigan; Marshfield, Wisconsin; and Kaiser-Permanente Northern California participated in a field trial. A quota design ensured a diverse sample by sex, age, and race/ethnicity. Each participant was asked to complete 2 recalls and was randomly assigned to 1 of 4 protocols differing by type of recall and administration order. For energy, the mean intakes were 2,425 versus 2,374 kcal for men and 1,876 versus 1,906 kcal for women by AMPM and ASA24, respectively. Of 20 nutrients/food groups analyzed and controlling for false discovery rate, 87% were judged equivalent at the 20% bound. ASA24 was preferred over AMPM by 70% of the respondents. Attrition was lower in the ASA24/AMPM study group than in the AMPM/ASA24 group, and it was lower in the ASA24/ASA24 group than in the AMPM/AMPM group. ASA24 offers the potential to collect high-quality dietary intake information at low cost with less attrition.
AB - Twenty-four-hour dietary recalls provide high-quality intake data but have been prohibitively expensive for large epidemiologic studies. This study's goal was to assess whether the web-based Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Recall (ASA24) performs similarly enough to the standard interviewer-administered, Automated Multiple-Pass Method (AMPM) 24-hour dietary recall to be considered a viable alternative. In 2010-2011, 1,081 adults from 3 integrated health systems in Detroit, Michigan; Marshfield, Wisconsin; and Kaiser-Permanente Northern California participated in a field trial. A quota design ensured a diverse sample by sex, age, and race/ethnicity. Each participant was asked to complete 2 recalls and was randomly assigned to 1 of 4 protocols differing by type of recall and administration order. For energy, the mean intakes were 2,425 versus 2,374 kcal for men and 1,876 versus 1,906 kcal for women by AMPM and ASA24, respectively. Of 20 nutrients/food groups analyzed and controlling for false discovery rate, 87% were judged equivalent at the 20% bound. ASA24 was preferred over AMPM by 70% of the respondents. Attrition was lower in the ASA24/AMPM study group than in the AMPM/ASA24 group, and it was lower in the ASA24/ASA24 group than in the AMPM/AMPM group. ASA24 offers the potential to collect high-quality dietary intake information at low cost with less attrition.
KW - comparative study
KW - diet survey
KW - experimental design
KW - nutritional assessment
KW - population
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931023234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931023234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwu467
DO - 10.1093/aje/kwu467
M3 - Article
C2 - 25964261
AN - SCOPUS:84931023234
VL - 181
SP - 970
EP - 978
JO - American Journal of Epidemiology
JF - American Journal of Epidemiology
SN - 0002-9262
IS - 12
ER -