Comparison of direct metal fabrication technologies for production of medical implants

Ola L A Harrysson, Omer Cansizoglu, Denis J Marcellin-Little

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Several direct metal fabrication technologies are available on the market for production of medical implants. Each technology has advantages and drawbacks and there is no consensus what constitutes optimal technology. These technologies are often considered to be competitors but that may not always be the case. Laser-based systems tend to be more accurate than electron beam-based systems and provide smaller features and finer surfaces. However, the fabrication cost may be higher and the build time longer with laser-based technology compared to electron beam-based technology, prohibiting fabrication of larger implants. This presentation reviews case studies where both electron beam and laser beam systems have been used to fabricate custom implants out of titanium. Build time, surface quality, feature size, and cost were compared and reviewed. This presentation gives an overview of the technologies and can help potential users to choose the system that fit their needs the best.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRapid 2009 Conference and Exposition
Pages1-9
Number of pages9
VolumeTP09PUB10
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009
Externally publishedYes
EventRapid 2009 Conference and Exposition - Schaumburg, IL, United States
Duration: May 12 2009May 14 2009

Other

OtherRapid 2009 Conference and Exposition
CountryUnited States
CitySchaumburg, IL
Period5/12/095/14/09

Fingerprint

Metals
Fabrication
Electron beams
Lasers
Titanium
Surface properties
Laser beams
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Harrysson, O. L. A., Cansizoglu, O., & Marcellin-Little, D. J. (2009). Comparison of direct metal fabrication technologies for production of medical implants. In Rapid 2009 Conference and Exposition (Vol. TP09PUB10, pp. 1-9)

Comparison of direct metal fabrication technologies for production of medical implants. / Harrysson, Ola L A; Cansizoglu, Omer; Marcellin-Little, Denis J.

Rapid 2009 Conference and Exposition. Vol. TP09PUB10 2009. p. 1-9.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Harrysson, OLA, Cansizoglu, O & Marcellin-Little, DJ 2009, Comparison of direct metal fabrication technologies for production of medical implants. in Rapid 2009 Conference and Exposition. vol. TP09PUB10, pp. 1-9, Rapid 2009 Conference and Exposition, Schaumburg, IL, United States, 5/12/09.
Harrysson OLA, Cansizoglu O, Marcellin-Little DJ. Comparison of direct metal fabrication technologies for production of medical implants. In Rapid 2009 Conference and Exposition. Vol. TP09PUB10. 2009. p. 1-9
Harrysson, Ola L A ; Cansizoglu, Omer ; Marcellin-Little, Denis J. / Comparison of direct metal fabrication technologies for production of medical implants. Rapid 2009 Conference and Exposition. Vol. TP09PUB10 2009. pp. 1-9
@inproceedings{2119024f6ac94d46ac597ed46086169a,
title = "Comparison of direct metal fabrication technologies for production of medical implants",
abstract = "Several direct metal fabrication technologies are available on the market for production of medical implants. Each technology has advantages and drawbacks and there is no consensus what constitutes optimal technology. These technologies are often considered to be competitors but that may not always be the case. Laser-based systems tend to be more accurate than electron beam-based systems and provide smaller features and finer surfaces. However, the fabrication cost may be higher and the build time longer with laser-based technology compared to electron beam-based technology, prohibiting fabrication of larger implants. This presentation reviews case studies where both electron beam and laser beam systems have been used to fabricate custom implants out of titanium. Build time, surface quality, feature size, and cost were compared and reviewed. This presentation gives an overview of the technologies and can help potential users to choose the system that fit their needs the best.",
author = "Harrysson, {Ola L A} and Omer Cansizoglu and Marcellin-Little, {Denis J}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "TP09PUB10",
pages = "1--9",
booktitle = "Rapid 2009 Conference and Exposition",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of direct metal fabrication technologies for production of medical implants

AU - Harrysson, Ola L A

AU - Cansizoglu, Omer

AU - Marcellin-Little, Denis J

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Several direct metal fabrication technologies are available on the market for production of medical implants. Each technology has advantages and drawbacks and there is no consensus what constitutes optimal technology. These technologies are often considered to be competitors but that may not always be the case. Laser-based systems tend to be more accurate than electron beam-based systems and provide smaller features and finer surfaces. However, the fabrication cost may be higher and the build time longer with laser-based technology compared to electron beam-based technology, prohibiting fabrication of larger implants. This presentation reviews case studies where both electron beam and laser beam systems have been used to fabricate custom implants out of titanium. Build time, surface quality, feature size, and cost were compared and reviewed. This presentation gives an overview of the technologies and can help potential users to choose the system that fit their needs the best.

AB - Several direct metal fabrication technologies are available on the market for production of medical implants. Each technology has advantages and drawbacks and there is no consensus what constitutes optimal technology. These technologies are often considered to be competitors but that may not always be the case. Laser-based systems tend to be more accurate than electron beam-based systems and provide smaller features and finer surfaces. However, the fabrication cost may be higher and the build time longer with laser-based technology compared to electron beam-based technology, prohibiting fabrication of larger implants. This presentation reviews case studies where both electron beam and laser beam systems have been used to fabricate custom implants out of titanium. Build time, surface quality, feature size, and cost were compared and reviewed. This presentation gives an overview of the technologies and can help potential users to choose the system that fit their needs the best.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649250180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649250180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - TP09PUB10

SP - 1

EP - 9

BT - Rapid 2009 Conference and Exposition

ER -