Comparison of clinical effects of epidural levobupivacaine morphine versus bupivacaine morphine in dogs undergoing elective pelvic limb surgery

Ilaria Cerasoli, Alexandru Tutunaru, Alessia Cenani, Juan Ramirez, Johann Detilleux, Marc Balligand, Charlotte Sandersen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy, in terms of the amount of rescue analgesia required, and the clinical usefulness of epidural injection of morphine with bupivacaine or levobupivacaine for elective pelvic limb surgery in dogs during a 24-hour perioperative period. Study design Prospective, blinded, randomized clinical study. Animals A group of 26 dogs weighing 31.7 ± 14.2 (mean ± standard deviation) kg and aged 54 ± 36 months. Methods All dogs were premedicated with methadone intravenously (0.2 mg kg–1) and anaesthesia induced with diazepam (0.2 mg kg–1) and propofol intravenously to effect. After induction of anaesthesia, dogs randomly received a lumbosacral epidural injection of morphine 0.1 mg kg–1 with either levobupivacaine 0.5% (1 mg kg–1; group LevoBM) or bupivacaine 0.5% (1 mg kg–1; group BM). Cardiovascular, respiratory and temperature values were recorded during the intra- and postoperative period. A visual analogue scale, subjective pain scale, sedation scale and the short form of the Glasgow pain scale were assessed every 6 hours after epidural injection during 24 hours. The ability to stand and walk, neurological deficits and other side effects were assessed at the same time points. The amount of rescue analgesia (sufentanil intraoperatively and methadone postoperatively) was recorded. Results No statistically significant differences were found between groups for any of the recorded data, with the exception of the incidence of spontaneous urination and postoperative rescue analgesia requirement. In group LevoBM four dogs spontaneously urinated at recovery while none of the dogs in group BM did (p = 0.03) and seven dogs of group LevoBM required postoperative rescue analgesia versus none of the dogs in the BM group (p = 0.005). Conclusions and clinical relevance Epidural LevoBM is a suitable alternative to BM in healthy dogs during elective pelvic limb surgery. Epidural BM produced more urinary retention but better pain control compared to the same concentration and dose of LevoBM in dogs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-345
Number of pages9
JournalVeterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

morphine
Bupivacaine
limbs (animal)
Morphine
Extremities
surgery
Dogs
dogs
analgesia
Epidural Injections
Analgesia
methadone
Methadone
injection
pain
anesthesia
Anesthesia
Intraoperative Period
levobupivacaine
Sufentanil

Keywords

  • bupivacaine
  • dogs
  • epidural
  • levobupivacaine
  • pelvic limb surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Comparison of clinical effects of epidural levobupivacaine morphine versus bupivacaine morphine in dogs undergoing elective pelvic limb surgery. / Cerasoli, Ilaria; Tutunaru, Alexandru; Cenani, Alessia; Ramirez, Juan; Detilleux, Johann; Balligand, Marc; Sandersen, Charlotte.

In: Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 44, No. 2, 01.03.2017, p. 337-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cerasoli, Ilaria ; Tutunaru, Alexandru ; Cenani, Alessia ; Ramirez, Juan ; Detilleux, Johann ; Balligand, Marc ; Sandersen, Charlotte. / Comparison of clinical effects of epidural levobupivacaine morphine versus bupivacaine morphine in dogs undergoing elective pelvic limb surgery. In: Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 2017 ; Vol. 44, No. 2. pp. 337-345.
@article{4f5642b307074a3a90cf927acc95a892,
title = "Comparison of clinical effects of epidural levobupivacaine morphine versus bupivacaine morphine in dogs undergoing elective pelvic limb surgery",
abstract = "Objective To evaluate the efficacy, in terms of the amount of rescue analgesia required, and the clinical usefulness of epidural injection of morphine with bupivacaine or levobupivacaine for elective pelvic limb surgery in dogs during a 24-hour perioperative period. Study design Prospective, blinded, randomized clinical study. Animals A group of 26 dogs weighing 31.7 ± 14.2 (mean ± standard deviation) kg and aged 54 ± 36 months. Methods All dogs were premedicated with methadone intravenously (0.2 mg kg–1) and anaesthesia induced with diazepam (0.2 mg kg–1) and propofol intravenously to effect. After induction of anaesthesia, dogs randomly received a lumbosacral epidural injection of morphine 0.1 mg kg–1 with either levobupivacaine 0.5{\%} (1 mg kg–1; group LevoBM) or bupivacaine 0.5{\%} (1 mg kg–1; group BM). Cardiovascular, respiratory and temperature values were recorded during the intra- and postoperative period. A visual analogue scale, subjective pain scale, sedation scale and the short form of the Glasgow pain scale were assessed every 6 hours after epidural injection during 24 hours. The ability to stand and walk, neurological deficits and other side effects were assessed at the same time points. The amount of rescue analgesia (sufentanil intraoperatively and methadone postoperatively) was recorded. Results No statistically significant differences were found between groups for any of the recorded data, with the exception of the incidence of spontaneous urination and postoperative rescue analgesia requirement. In group LevoBM four dogs spontaneously urinated at recovery while none of the dogs in group BM did (p = 0.03) and seven dogs of group LevoBM required postoperative rescue analgesia versus none of the dogs in the BM group (p = 0.005). Conclusions and clinical relevance Epidural LevoBM is a suitable alternative to BM in healthy dogs during elective pelvic limb surgery. Epidural BM produced more urinary retention but better pain control compared to the same concentration and dose of LevoBM in dogs.",
keywords = "bupivacaine, dogs, epidural, levobupivacaine, pelvic limb surgery",
author = "Ilaria Cerasoli and Alexandru Tutunaru and Alessia Cenani and Juan Ramirez and Johann Detilleux and Marc Balligand and Charlotte Sandersen",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.vaa.2016.01.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "337--345",
journal = "Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "1467-2987",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of clinical effects of epidural levobupivacaine morphine versus bupivacaine morphine in dogs undergoing elective pelvic limb surgery

AU - Cerasoli, Ilaria

AU - Tutunaru, Alexandru

AU - Cenani, Alessia

AU - Ramirez, Juan

AU - Detilleux, Johann

AU - Balligand, Marc

AU - Sandersen, Charlotte

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objective To evaluate the efficacy, in terms of the amount of rescue analgesia required, and the clinical usefulness of epidural injection of morphine with bupivacaine or levobupivacaine for elective pelvic limb surgery in dogs during a 24-hour perioperative period. Study design Prospective, blinded, randomized clinical study. Animals A group of 26 dogs weighing 31.7 ± 14.2 (mean ± standard deviation) kg and aged 54 ± 36 months. Methods All dogs were premedicated with methadone intravenously (0.2 mg kg–1) and anaesthesia induced with diazepam (0.2 mg kg–1) and propofol intravenously to effect. After induction of anaesthesia, dogs randomly received a lumbosacral epidural injection of morphine 0.1 mg kg–1 with either levobupivacaine 0.5% (1 mg kg–1; group LevoBM) or bupivacaine 0.5% (1 mg kg–1; group BM). Cardiovascular, respiratory and temperature values were recorded during the intra- and postoperative period. A visual analogue scale, subjective pain scale, sedation scale and the short form of the Glasgow pain scale were assessed every 6 hours after epidural injection during 24 hours. The ability to stand and walk, neurological deficits and other side effects were assessed at the same time points. The amount of rescue analgesia (sufentanil intraoperatively and methadone postoperatively) was recorded. Results No statistically significant differences were found between groups for any of the recorded data, with the exception of the incidence of spontaneous urination and postoperative rescue analgesia requirement. In group LevoBM four dogs spontaneously urinated at recovery while none of the dogs in group BM did (p = 0.03) and seven dogs of group LevoBM required postoperative rescue analgesia versus none of the dogs in the BM group (p = 0.005). Conclusions and clinical relevance Epidural LevoBM is a suitable alternative to BM in healthy dogs during elective pelvic limb surgery. Epidural BM produced more urinary retention but better pain control compared to the same concentration and dose of LevoBM in dogs.

AB - Objective To evaluate the efficacy, in terms of the amount of rescue analgesia required, and the clinical usefulness of epidural injection of morphine with bupivacaine or levobupivacaine for elective pelvic limb surgery in dogs during a 24-hour perioperative period. Study design Prospective, blinded, randomized clinical study. Animals A group of 26 dogs weighing 31.7 ± 14.2 (mean ± standard deviation) kg and aged 54 ± 36 months. Methods All dogs were premedicated with methadone intravenously (0.2 mg kg–1) and anaesthesia induced with diazepam (0.2 mg kg–1) and propofol intravenously to effect. After induction of anaesthesia, dogs randomly received a lumbosacral epidural injection of morphine 0.1 mg kg–1 with either levobupivacaine 0.5% (1 mg kg–1; group LevoBM) or bupivacaine 0.5% (1 mg kg–1; group BM). Cardiovascular, respiratory and temperature values were recorded during the intra- and postoperative period. A visual analogue scale, subjective pain scale, sedation scale and the short form of the Glasgow pain scale were assessed every 6 hours after epidural injection during 24 hours. The ability to stand and walk, neurological deficits and other side effects were assessed at the same time points. The amount of rescue analgesia (sufentanil intraoperatively and methadone postoperatively) was recorded. Results No statistically significant differences were found between groups for any of the recorded data, with the exception of the incidence of spontaneous urination and postoperative rescue analgesia requirement. In group LevoBM four dogs spontaneously urinated at recovery while none of the dogs in group BM did (p = 0.03) and seven dogs of group LevoBM required postoperative rescue analgesia versus none of the dogs in the BM group (p = 0.005). Conclusions and clinical relevance Epidural LevoBM is a suitable alternative to BM in healthy dogs during elective pelvic limb surgery. Epidural BM produced more urinary retention but better pain control compared to the same concentration and dose of LevoBM in dogs.

KW - bupivacaine

KW - dogs

KW - epidural

KW - levobupivacaine

KW - pelvic limb surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029619613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029619613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.01.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 28341107

AN - SCOPUS:85029619613

VL - 44

SP - 337

EP - 345

JO - Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 1467-2987

IS - 2

ER -