Comparison of bovine hematology reference intervals from 1957 to 2006

Jeanne W. George, Joy Snipes, V Michael Lane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The most commonly used bovine hematology reference intervals were published in 1965. We found the results from healthy cattle in 2001 differed from those in many ways. Discovery of the original laboratory book used to calculate the 1965 values gave us the opportunity to evaluate whether hematology values of healthy cattle have changed over time. Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish hematology reference intervals for Holstein cows, compare selected hematologic results with similar population data from 1957, and compare these reference intervals with those of other North American veterinary schools and published values. Methods: Reference intervals were developed in 2001 using clinically healthy, bovine leukemia virus-negative, mid-lactation Holstein cows. Selected parts of the hemograms and neutrophil:lymphocyte (N:L) ratio were compared with those from healthy, age-matched Holstein cows evaluated in 1957. Bovine reference intervals were solicited from clinical pathology laboratories in North American veterinary colleges and analyzed for population characteristics and method of analysis. Results: Between 1957 and 2001, mean neutrophil counts increased significantly, whereas lymphocyte, monocyte, and eosinophil counts and hemoglobin concentration decreased significantly. Mean N:L ratio increased significantly to 1.17. Most surveyed laboratories were using the 1965 reference intervals. Two other institutions that had developed reference intervals after 2000 had results similar to ours. Conclusions: Continued use of older bovine hematology reference intervals could lead to misinterpretation of within-reference neutrophil counts as neutrophilia and under-recognition of neutropenia, eosinophilia, monocytosis, or lymphocytosis. Use of N:L>1 as evidence of inflammation should be discontinued or used with great caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)138-148
Number of pages11
JournalVeterinary Clinical Pathology
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Hematology
hematology
neutrophils
Neutrophils
lymphocytes
Lymphocytes
cattle
Holstein
cows
Veterinary Schools
Bovine Leukemia Virus
Lymphocytosis
Bovine leukemia virus
eosinophilia
neutropenia
Clinical Pathology
population characteristics
Eosinophilia
Population Characteristics
eosinophils

Keywords

  • Cattle
  • Hematology
  • Hemogram
  • Leukogram
  • Reference interval

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Comparison of bovine hematology reference intervals from 1957 to 2006. / George, Jeanne W.; Snipes, Joy; Lane, V Michael.

In: Veterinary Clinical Pathology, Vol. 39, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 138-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

George, Jeanne W. ; Snipes, Joy ; Lane, V Michael. / Comparison of bovine hematology reference intervals from 1957 to 2006. In: Veterinary Clinical Pathology. 2010 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 138-148.
@article{c67f6020fb2947b4b6a14f1a62adadea,
title = "Comparison of bovine hematology reference intervals from 1957 to 2006",
abstract = "Background: The most commonly used bovine hematology reference intervals were published in 1965. We found the results from healthy cattle in 2001 differed from those in many ways. Discovery of the original laboratory book used to calculate the 1965 values gave us the opportunity to evaluate whether hematology values of healthy cattle have changed over time. Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish hematology reference intervals for Holstein cows, compare selected hematologic results with similar population data from 1957, and compare these reference intervals with those of other North American veterinary schools and published values. Methods: Reference intervals were developed in 2001 using clinically healthy, bovine leukemia virus-negative, mid-lactation Holstein cows. Selected parts of the hemograms and neutrophil:lymphocyte (N:L) ratio were compared with those from healthy, age-matched Holstein cows evaluated in 1957. Bovine reference intervals were solicited from clinical pathology laboratories in North American veterinary colleges and analyzed for population characteristics and method of analysis. Results: Between 1957 and 2001, mean neutrophil counts increased significantly, whereas lymphocyte, monocyte, and eosinophil counts and hemoglobin concentration decreased significantly. Mean N:L ratio increased significantly to 1.17. Most surveyed laboratories were using the 1965 reference intervals. Two other institutions that had developed reference intervals after 2000 had results similar to ours. Conclusions: Continued use of older bovine hematology reference intervals could lead to misinterpretation of within-reference neutrophil counts as neutrophilia and under-recognition of neutropenia, eosinophilia, monocytosis, or lymphocytosis. Use of N:L>1 as evidence of inflammation should be discontinued or used with great caution.",
keywords = "Cattle, Hematology, Hemogram, Leukogram, Reference interval",
author = "George, {Jeanne W.} and Joy Snipes and Lane, {V Michael}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1939-165X.2009.00208.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "138--148",
journal = "Veterinary Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0275-6382",
publisher = "American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of bovine hematology reference intervals from 1957 to 2006

AU - George, Jeanne W.

AU - Snipes, Joy

AU - Lane, V Michael

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Background: The most commonly used bovine hematology reference intervals were published in 1965. We found the results from healthy cattle in 2001 differed from those in many ways. Discovery of the original laboratory book used to calculate the 1965 values gave us the opportunity to evaluate whether hematology values of healthy cattle have changed over time. Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish hematology reference intervals for Holstein cows, compare selected hematologic results with similar population data from 1957, and compare these reference intervals with those of other North American veterinary schools and published values. Methods: Reference intervals were developed in 2001 using clinically healthy, bovine leukemia virus-negative, mid-lactation Holstein cows. Selected parts of the hemograms and neutrophil:lymphocyte (N:L) ratio were compared with those from healthy, age-matched Holstein cows evaluated in 1957. Bovine reference intervals were solicited from clinical pathology laboratories in North American veterinary colleges and analyzed for population characteristics and method of analysis. Results: Between 1957 and 2001, mean neutrophil counts increased significantly, whereas lymphocyte, monocyte, and eosinophil counts and hemoglobin concentration decreased significantly. Mean N:L ratio increased significantly to 1.17. Most surveyed laboratories were using the 1965 reference intervals. Two other institutions that had developed reference intervals after 2000 had results similar to ours. Conclusions: Continued use of older bovine hematology reference intervals could lead to misinterpretation of within-reference neutrophil counts as neutrophilia and under-recognition of neutropenia, eosinophilia, monocytosis, or lymphocytosis. Use of N:L>1 as evidence of inflammation should be discontinued or used with great caution.

AB - Background: The most commonly used bovine hematology reference intervals were published in 1965. We found the results from healthy cattle in 2001 differed from those in many ways. Discovery of the original laboratory book used to calculate the 1965 values gave us the opportunity to evaluate whether hematology values of healthy cattle have changed over time. Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish hematology reference intervals for Holstein cows, compare selected hematologic results with similar population data from 1957, and compare these reference intervals with those of other North American veterinary schools and published values. Methods: Reference intervals were developed in 2001 using clinically healthy, bovine leukemia virus-negative, mid-lactation Holstein cows. Selected parts of the hemograms and neutrophil:lymphocyte (N:L) ratio were compared with those from healthy, age-matched Holstein cows evaluated in 1957. Bovine reference intervals were solicited from clinical pathology laboratories in North American veterinary colleges and analyzed for population characteristics and method of analysis. Results: Between 1957 and 2001, mean neutrophil counts increased significantly, whereas lymphocyte, monocyte, and eosinophil counts and hemoglobin concentration decreased significantly. Mean N:L ratio increased significantly to 1.17. Most surveyed laboratories were using the 1965 reference intervals. Two other institutions that had developed reference intervals after 2000 had results similar to ours. Conclusions: Continued use of older bovine hematology reference intervals could lead to misinterpretation of within-reference neutrophil counts as neutrophilia and under-recognition of neutropenia, eosinophilia, monocytosis, or lymphocytosis. Use of N:L>1 as evidence of inflammation should be discontinued or used with great caution.

KW - Cattle

KW - Hematology

KW - Hemogram

KW - Leukogram

KW - Reference interval

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954381160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954381160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2009.00208.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2009.00208.x

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 138

EP - 148

JO - Veterinary Clinical Pathology

JF - Veterinary Clinical Pathology

SN - 0275-6382

IS - 2

ER -