Comparison of accessory performance using a novel ERCP mechanical simulator

Joseph Leung, W. Lee, R. Wilson, B. S. Lim, F. W. Leung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and study aims: There is a paucity of in vitro methods for evaluating ERCP accessories. We hypothesize that the time taken to perform a simulated single stent or multiple stents placement is different for stenting systems with or without the capability of intraductal ductal release (IDR) of the guide wire. Patients and methods: We conducted an unblinded in vitro comparison of ERCP accessories using a mechanical simulator during hands-on ERCP practice workshops. A total of 21 U.S. participants and 20 Chinese participants with various level of ERCP experience took part in the different practice workshops. Accessories with and without the capability of intraductal release of guide wire were compared. Total time required for completing a simulated stenting procedure with single or multiple stents and the respective simulated fluoroscopy time were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in the time taken for placement of a single stent using either stenting systems. Stenting system capable of intraductal release of the guide wire required significantly shorter time to complete placement of three stents. Conclusions: Using time required to complete a specific task, i.e. biliary stenting, the mechanical simulator permits the performance of different accessories by the same group of operators to be evaluated objectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)983-988
Number of pages6
JournalEndoscopy
Volume40
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Stents
Education
Fluoroscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Comparison of accessory performance using a novel ERCP mechanical simulator. / Leung, Joseph; Lee, W.; Wilson, R.; Lim, B. S.; Leung, F. W.

In: Endoscopy, Vol. 40, No. 12, 12.2008, p. 983-988.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leung, Joseph ; Lee, W. ; Wilson, R. ; Lim, B. S. ; Leung, F. W. / Comparison of accessory performance using a novel ERCP mechanical simulator. In: Endoscopy. 2008 ; Vol. 40, No. 12. pp. 983-988.
@article{957240af8a1b46b5a0a49cf04bbafa17,
title = "Comparison of accessory performance using a novel ERCP mechanical simulator",
abstract = "Background and study aims: There is a paucity of in vitro methods for evaluating ERCP accessories. We hypothesize that the time taken to perform a simulated single stent or multiple stents placement is different for stenting systems with or without the capability of intraductal ductal release (IDR) of the guide wire. Patients and methods: We conducted an unblinded in vitro comparison of ERCP accessories using a mechanical simulator during hands-on ERCP practice workshops. A total of 21 U.S. participants and 20 Chinese participants with various level of ERCP experience took part in the different practice workshops. Accessories with and without the capability of intraductal release of guide wire were compared. Total time required for completing a simulated stenting procedure with single or multiple stents and the respective simulated fluoroscopy time were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in the time taken for placement of a single stent using either stenting systems. Stenting system capable of intraductal release of the guide wire required significantly shorter time to complete placement of three stents. Conclusions: Using time required to complete a specific task, i.e. biliary stenting, the mechanical simulator permits the performance of different accessories by the same group of operators to be evaluated objectively.",
author = "Joseph Leung and W. Lee and R. Wilson and Lim, {B. S.} and Leung, {F. W.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1055/s-2008-1077777",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "983--988",
journal = "Endoscopy",
issn = "0013-726X",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of accessory performance using a novel ERCP mechanical simulator

AU - Leung, Joseph

AU - Lee, W.

AU - Wilson, R.

AU - Lim, B. S.

AU - Leung, F. W.

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Background and study aims: There is a paucity of in vitro methods for evaluating ERCP accessories. We hypothesize that the time taken to perform a simulated single stent or multiple stents placement is different for stenting systems with or without the capability of intraductal ductal release (IDR) of the guide wire. Patients and methods: We conducted an unblinded in vitro comparison of ERCP accessories using a mechanical simulator during hands-on ERCP practice workshops. A total of 21 U.S. participants and 20 Chinese participants with various level of ERCP experience took part in the different practice workshops. Accessories with and without the capability of intraductal release of guide wire were compared. Total time required for completing a simulated stenting procedure with single or multiple stents and the respective simulated fluoroscopy time were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in the time taken for placement of a single stent using either stenting systems. Stenting system capable of intraductal release of the guide wire required significantly shorter time to complete placement of three stents. Conclusions: Using time required to complete a specific task, i.e. biliary stenting, the mechanical simulator permits the performance of different accessories by the same group of operators to be evaluated objectively.

AB - Background and study aims: There is a paucity of in vitro methods for evaluating ERCP accessories. We hypothesize that the time taken to perform a simulated single stent or multiple stents placement is different for stenting systems with or without the capability of intraductal ductal release (IDR) of the guide wire. Patients and methods: We conducted an unblinded in vitro comparison of ERCP accessories using a mechanical simulator during hands-on ERCP practice workshops. A total of 21 U.S. participants and 20 Chinese participants with various level of ERCP experience took part in the different practice workshops. Accessories with and without the capability of intraductal release of guide wire were compared. Total time required for completing a simulated stenting procedure with single or multiple stents and the respective simulated fluoroscopy time were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in the time taken for placement of a single stent using either stenting systems. Stenting system capable of intraductal release of the guide wire required significantly shorter time to complete placement of three stents. Conclusions: Using time required to complete a specific task, i.e. biliary stenting, the mechanical simulator permits the performance of different accessories by the same group of operators to be evaluated objectively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149093686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149093686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-2008-1077777

DO - 10.1055/s-2008-1077777

M3 - Article

C2 - 19065479

AN - SCOPUS:58149093686

VL - 40

SP - 983

EP - 988

JO - Endoscopy

JF - Endoscopy

SN - 0013-726X

IS - 12

ER -