Comparison of 3 optical navigation systems for computer-aided maxillofacial surgery

E Bradley Strong, Amir Rafii, Bettina Holhweg-Majert, Scott Fuller, Marc Christian Metzger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy of 3 computer-aided surgery systems for maxillofacial reconstruction. Design: Evaluation of 3 computer-aided surgery systems: StealthStation, VectorVision, and Voxim. Setting: The University of California, Davis, Department of Otolaryngology computer-aided surgery laboratory. Participants: Four fresh cadaveric heads. Main Outcome Measure: Mean target registration error. Results: The StealthStation was the most accurate (mean [SD] target registration error, 1.00 [0.04] mm), followed by VectorVision (1.13 [0.05] mm) and then Voxim (1.34 [0.04] mm). All values met statistical significance (P < .05). Conclusions: Measurable accuracy differences were found among the navigation systems evaluated. The Stealth-Station was the most accurate. However, the differences are small, and the clinical significance for maxillofacial reconstruction is negligible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1080-1084
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume134
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of 3 optical navigation systems for computer-aided maxillofacial surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this