Comparing the use of physician time and health care resources among patients speaking English, Spanish, and Russian

Richard L Kravitz, L. Jay Helms, Rahman Azari, Deirdre Antonius, Joy Melnikow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES. The number of US residents with limited English proficiency (LEP) is 14 million and rising. The goal of this study was to estimate the effects of LEP on physician time and resource use. DESIGN. This was a prospective, observational study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS.The study included 285 Medicaid patients speaking English (n = 112), Spanish (n = 62), or Russian (n = 111) visiting the General Medicine and Family Practice Clinics at the UC Davis Medical Center in 1996-1997 (participation rate, 85%). Bilingual research assistants administered patient questionnaires, abstracted the medical record, and conducted detailed time and motion studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. We used seemingly unrelated regression models to evaluate the effect of language on visit time, controlling for patient demographics and health status, physician specialty, visit type, and resident involvement in care. We also estimated the effect of LEP on cross-sectional utilization of health care resources and adherence to follow-up with referral and testing appointments. RESULTS. The 3 language groups differed significantly by age, education, and reason for visit but not gender, number of active medical conditions, physical functioning, or mental health. Physician visit time averaged 38±20 minutes (mean±SD). Compared with English-speaking patients and after multivariate adjustment, Spanish and Russian speakers averaged 9.1 and 5.6 additional minutes of physician time, respectively (P <0.05). The language effect was confined largely to follow-up visits with resident physicians (house staff). Compared with English speakers, Russian speakers had more referrals (P = 0.003) and Spanish speakers were less likely to follow-up with recommended laboratory studies (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS, In these academic primary care clinics, some groups of patients using interpreters required more physician time than those proficient in English. Additional reimbursement may be needed to ensure continued access and high-quality care for this special population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)728-738
Number of pages11
JournalMedical Care
Volume38
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2000

Fingerprint

Health Resources
speaking
physician
health care
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
resources
Language
resident
Referral and Consultation
general medicine
Social Adjustment
language group
Time and Motion Studies
Family Practice
Quality of Health Care
Medicaid
interpreter
Internship and Residency
language

Keywords

  • Costs of health care
  • Limited English proficiency
  • Medical interpreters
  • Resource utilization
  • Russian
  • Spanish

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Comparing the use of physician time and health care resources among patients speaking English, Spanish, and Russian. / Kravitz, Richard L; Helms, L. Jay; Azari, Rahman; Antonius, Deirdre; Melnikow, Joy.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 38, No. 7, 07.2000, p. 728-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b945cba9a53b41b29e97136ab90b534c,
title = "Comparing the use of physician time and health care resources among patients speaking English, Spanish, and Russian",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES. The number of US residents with limited English proficiency (LEP) is 14 million and rising. The goal of this study was to estimate the effects of LEP on physician time and resource use. DESIGN. This was a prospective, observational study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS.The study included 285 Medicaid patients speaking English (n = 112), Spanish (n = 62), or Russian (n = 111) visiting the General Medicine and Family Practice Clinics at the UC Davis Medical Center in 1996-1997 (participation rate, 85{\%}). Bilingual research assistants administered patient questionnaires, abstracted the medical record, and conducted detailed time and motion studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. We used seemingly unrelated regression models to evaluate the effect of language on visit time, controlling for patient demographics and health status, physician specialty, visit type, and resident involvement in care. We also estimated the effect of LEP on cross-sectional utilization of health care resources and adherence to follow-up with referral and testing appointments. RESULTS. The 3 language groups differed significantly by age, education, and reason for visit but not gender, number of active medical conditions, physical functioning, or mental health. Physician visit time averaged 38±20 minutes (mean±SD). Compared with English-speaking patients and after multivariate adjustment, Spanish and Russian speakers averaged 9.1 and 5.6 additional minutes of physician time, respectively (P <0.05). The language effect was confined largely to follow-up visits with resident physicians (house staff). Compared with English speakers, Russian speakers had more referrals (P = 0.003) and Spanish speakers were less likely to follow-up with recommended laboratory studies (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS, In these academic primary care clinics, some groups of patients using interpreters required more physician time than those proficient in English. Additional reimbursement may be needed to ensure continued access and high-quality care for this special population.",
keywords = "Costs of health care, Limited English proficiency, Medical interpreters, Resource utilization, Russian, Spanish",
author = "Kravitz, {Richard L} and Helms, {L. Jay} and Rahman Azari and Deirdre Antonius and Joy Melnikow",
year = "2000",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "728--738",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the use of physician time and health care resources among patients speaking English, Spanish, and Russian

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Helms, L. Jay

AU - Azari, Rahman

AU - Antonius, Deirdre

AU - Melnikow, Joy

PY - 2000/7

Y1 - 2000/7

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES. The number of US residents with limited English proficiency (LEP) is 14 million and rising. The goal of this study was to estimate the effects of LEP on physician time and resource use. DESIGN. This was a prospective, observational study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS.The study included 285 Medicaid patients speaking English (n = 112), Spanish (n = 62), or Russian (n = 111) visiting the General Medicine and Family Practice Clinics at the UC Davis Medical Center in 1996-1997 (participation rate, 85%). Bilingual research assistants administered patient questionnaires, abstracted the medical record, and conducted detailed time and motion studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. We used seemingly unrelated regression models to evaluate the effect of language on visit time, controlling for patient demographics and health status, physician specialty, visit type, and resident involvement in care. We also estimated the effect of LEP on cross-sectional utilization of health care resources and adherence to follow-up with referral and testing appointments. RESULTS. The 3 language groups differed significantly by age, education, and reason for visit but not gender, number of active medical conditions, physical functioning, or mental health. Physician visit time averaged 38±20 minutes (mean±SD). Compared with English-speaking patients and after multivariate adjustment, Spanish and Russian speakers averaged 9.1 and 5.6 additional minutes of physician time, respectively (P <0.05). The language effect was confined largely to follow-up visits with resident physicians (house staff). Compared with English speakers, Russian speakers had more referrals (P = 0.003) and Spanish speakers were less likely to follow-up with recommended laboratory studies (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS, In these academic primary care clinics, some groups of patients using interpreters required more physician time than those proficient in English. Additional reimbursement may be needed to ensure continued access and high-quality care for this special population.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES. The number of US residents with limited English proficiency (LEP) is 14 million and rising. The goal of this study was to estimate the effects of LEP on physician time and resource use. DESIGN. This was a prospective, observational study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS.The study included 285 Medicaid patients speaking English (n = 112), Spanish (n = 62), or Russian (n = 111) visiting the General Medicine and Family Practice Clinics at the UC Davis Medical Center in 1996-1997 (participation rate, 85%). Bilingual research assistants administered patient questionnaires, abstracted the medical record, and conducted detailed time and motion studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. We used seemingly unrelated regression models to evaluate the effect of language on visit time, controlling for patient demographics and health status, physician specialty, visit type, and resident involvement in care. We also estimated the effect of LEP on cross-sectional utilization of health care resources and adherence to follow-up with referral and testing appointments. RESULTS. The 3 language groups differed significantly by age, education, and reason for visit but not gender, number of active medical conditions, physical functioning, or mental health. Physician visit time averaged 38±20 minutes (mean±SD). Compared with English-speaking patients and after multivariate adjustment, Spanish and Russian speakers averaged 9.1 and 5.6 additional minutes of physician time, respectively (P <0.05). The language effect was confined largely to follow-up visits with resident physicians (house staff). Compared with English speakers, Russian speakers had more referrals (P = 0.003) and Spanish speakers were less likely to follow-up with recommended laboratory studies (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS, In these academic primary care clinics, some groups of patients using interpreters required more physician time than those proficient in English. Additional reimbursement may be needed to ensure continued access and high-quality care for this special population.

KW - Costs of health care

KW - Limited English proficiency

KW - Medical interpreters

KW - Resource utilization

KW - Russian

KW - Spanish

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034218784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034218784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 728

EP - 738

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 7

ER -