Common methodologies in the evaluation of food allergy: Pitfalls and prospects of food allergy prevalence studies

Shang An Shu, Christopher Chang, Patrick S Leung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Global and regional studies on the prevalence of food allergies are plagued by inconsistent methodologies, variations in interpretation of results, and non-standardized study design. Hence, it becomes difficult to compare the prevalence of food allergies in different communities. This information would be useful in providing critical data that will enhance research to elucidate the nature of food allergies, and the role of gene-environment interactions in the sensitization of children and adults to foods. Testing methodologies range from questionnaires to objective in vitro and in vivo testing, to the gold standard, double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Although considered the most accurate and reliable method in detecting the prevalence of food allergy, DBPCFC is not always practical in epidemiological studies of food allergy. On the other hand, multiple logistic regression studies have been done to determine predictability of the outcome of food challenges, and it appears that skin prick testing and in vitro-specific serum IgE are the best predictors. Future studies directed towards confirming the validity of these methods as well as developing algorithms to predict the food challenge outcomes are required, as they may someday become accessory tools to complement DBPCFC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)198-210
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Food Hypersensitivity
Cross-Sectional Studies
Food
Placebos
Gene-Environment Interaction
Immunoglobulin E
Epidemiologic Studies
Logistic Models
Skin
Serum
Research

Keywords

  • Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge
  • Epicutaneous testing
  • Food allergy
  • Skin prick testing
  • Specific IgE antibody testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Common methodologies in the evaluation of food allergy : Pitfalls and prospects of food allergy prevalence studies. / Shu, Shang An; Chang, Christopher; Leung, Patrick S.

In: Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology, Vol. 46, No. 3, 2014, p. 198-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c0e89edcac6a470abbc6885fe246c9dc,
title = "Common methodologies in the evaluation of food allergy: Pitfalls and prospects of food allergy prevalence studies",
abstract = "Global and regional studies on the prevalence of food allergies are plagued by inconsistent methodologies, variations in interpretation of results, and non-standardized study design. Hence, it becomes difficult to compare the prevalence of food allergies in different communities. This information would be useful in providing critical data that will enhance research to elucidate the nature of food allergies, and the role of gene-environment interactions in the sensitization of children and adults to foods. Testing methodologies range from questionnaires to objective in vitro and in vivo testing, to the gold standard, double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Although considered the most accurate and reliable method in detecting the prevalence of food allergy, DBPCFC is not always practical in epidemiological studies of food allergy. On the other hand, multiple logistic regression studies have been done to determine predictability of the outcome of food challenges, and it appears that skin prick testing and in vitro-specific serum IgE are the best predictors. Future studies directed towards confirming the validity of these methods as well as developing algorithms to predict the food challenge outcomes are required, as they may someday become accessory tools to complement DBPCFC.",
keywords = "Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, Epicutaneous testing, Food allergy, Skin prick testing, Specific IgE antibody testing",
author = "Shu, {Shang An} and Christopher Chang and Leung, {Patrick S}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s12016-012-8337-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "198--210",
journal = "Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology",
issn = "1080-0549",
publisher = "Humana Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Common methodologies in the evaluation of food allergy

T2 - Pitfalls and prospects of food allergy prevalence studies

AU - Shu, Shang An

AU - Chang, Christopher

AU - Leung, Patrick S

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Global and regional studies on the prevalence of food allergies are plagued by inconsistent methodologies, variations in interpretation of results, and non-standardized study design. Hence, it becomes difficult to compare the prevalence of food allergies in different communities. This information would be useful in providing critical data that will enhance research to elucidate the nature of food allergies, and the role of gene-environment interactions in the sensitization of children and adults to foods. Testing methodologies range from questionnaires to objective in vitro and in vivo testing, to the gold standard, double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Although considered the most accurate and reliable method in detecting the prevalence of food allergy, DBPCFC is not always practical in epidemiological studies of food allergy. On the other hand, multiple logistic regression studies have been done to determine predictability of the outcome of food challenges, and it appears that skin prick testing and in vitro-specific serum IgE are the best predictors. Future studies directed towards confirming the validity of these methods as well as developing algorithms to predict the food challenge outcomes are required, as they may someday become accessory tools to complement DBPCFC.

AB - Global and regional studies on the prevalence of food allergies are plagued by inconsistent methodologies, variations in interpretation of results, and non-standardized study design. Hence, it becomes difficult to compare the prevalence of food allergies in different communities. This information would be useful in providing critical data that will enhance research to elucidate the nature of food allergies, and the role of gene-environment interactions in the sensitization of children and adults to foods. Testing methodologies range from questionnaires to objective in vitro and in vivo testing, to the gold standard, double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Although considered the most accurate and reliable method in detecting the prevalence of food allergy, DBPCFC is not always practical in epidemiological studies of food allergy. On the other hand, multiple logistic regression studies have been done to determine predictability of the outcome of food challenges, and it appears that skin prick testing and in vitro-specific serum IgE are the best predictors. Future studies directed towards confirming the validity of these methods as well as developing algorithms to predict the food challenge outcomes are required, as they may someday become accessory tools to complement DBPCFC.

KW - Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge

KW - Epicutaneous testing

KW - Food allergy

KW - Skin prick testing

KW - Specific IgE antibody testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902553278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902553278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12016-012-8337-8

DO - 10.1007/s12016-012-8337-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 23179516

AN - SCOPUS:84902553278

VL - 46

SP - 198

EP - 210

JO - Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology

JF - Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology

SN - 1080-0549

IS - 3

ER -