Colopexy of the equine large colon: comparison of two techniques.

M. D. Markel, D. J. Dreyfuss, Dennis Meagher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A study was designed to evaluate 2 colopexy techniques (A and B) in 8 clinically normal horses to determine which technique would prevent recurrence of large-colon displacement and/or volvulus. For technique A, 35 cm of the lateral free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the abdominal wall, 6 cm to the left of ventral midline. For technique B, the medial free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the medial free band of the right ventral colon, and 8 cm of the lateral free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the abdominal wall, 6 cm to the left of ventral midline. One horse from each group was euthanatized at 6 months, and another at 12 months after surgery. The position of the large colon, the integrity of the colopexy, and other adhesions within the abdominal cavity were evaluated. At necropsy, attempts were made to manually create displacement and volvulus of the large colon. The remaining horses in each group were anesthetized 6 months or 12 months after surgery, and the integrity of the colopexy was evaluated. After a 60-day recovery period, these horses were exercised for 2 months. Although each horse initially lost weight, the weight of all but 2 was acceptable at the conclusion of the study. Two horses that had technique-B colopexies had progressive weight loss serious enough to warrant euthanasia. Both colopexy techniques prevented manual creation of large-colon displacement and large-colon volvulus centered at the sternal and diaphragmatic flexures. Technique-A colopexy also prevented manual creation of volvulus of the large colon centered at its base.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)354-357
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Volume192
Issue number3
StatePublished - Feb 1 1988

Fingerprint

Horses
colon
Colon
horses
volvulus
Intestinal Volvulus
methodology
Abdominal Wall
surgery
Weights and Measures
abdominal cavity
Euthanasia
Abdominal Cavity
euthanasia
adhesion
Weight Loss
necropsy
weight loss
Recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Colopexy of the equine large colon : comparison of two techniques. / Markel, M. D.; Dreyfuss, D. J.; Meagher, Dennis.

In: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Vol. 192, No. 3, 01.02.1988, p. 354-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6121ab4da694fdf9bacb7d14f1ada38,
title = "Colopexy of the equine large colon: comparison of two techniques.",
abstract = "A study was designed to evaluate 2 colopexy techniques (A and B) in 8 clinically normal horses to determine which technique would prevent recurrence of large-colon displacement and/or volvulus. For technique A, 35 cm of the lateral free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the abdominal wall, 6 cm to the left of ventral midline. For technique B, the medial free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the medial free band of the right ventral colon, and 8 cm of the lateral free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the abdominal wall, 6 cm to the left of ventral midline. One horse from each group was euthanatized at 6 months, and another at 12 months after surgery. The position of the large colon, the integrity of the colopexy, and other adhesions within the abdominal cavity were evaluated. At necropsy, attempts were made to manually create displacement and volvulus of the large colon. The remaining horses in each group were anesthetized 6 months or 12 months after surgery, and the integrity of the colopexy was evaluated. After a 60-day recovery period, these horses were exercised for 2 months. Although each horse initially lost weight, the weight of all but 2 was acceptable at the conclusion of the study. Two horses that had technique-B colopexies had progressive weight loss serious enough to warrant euthanasia. Both colopexy techniques prevented manual creation of large-colon displacement and large-colon volvulus centered at the sternal and diaphragmatic flexures. Technique-A colopexy also prevented manual creation of volvulus of the large colon centered at its base.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)",
author = "Markel, {M. D.} and Dreyfuss, {D. J.} and Dennis Meagher",
year = "1988",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "192",
pages = "354--357",
journal = "Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association",
issn = "0003-1488",
publisher = "American Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colopexy of the equine large colon

T2 - comparison of two techniques.

AU - Markel, M. D.

AU - Dreyfuss, D. J.

AU - Meagher, Dennis

PY - 1988/2/1

Y1 - 1988/2/1

N2 - A study was designed to evaluate 2 colopexy techniques (A and B) in 8 clinically normal horses to determine which technique would prevent recurrence of large-colon displacement and/or volvulus. For technique A, 35 cm of the lateral free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the abdominal wall, 6 cm to the left of ventral midline. For technique B, the medial free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the medial free band of the right ventral colon, and 8 cm of the lateral free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the abdominal wall, 6 cm to the left of ventral midline. One horse from each group was euthanatized at 6 months, and another at 12 months after surgery. The position of the large colon, the integrity of the colopexy, and other adhesions within the abdominal cavity were evaluated. At necropsy, attempts were made to manually create displacement and volvulus of the large colon. The remaining horses in each group were anesthetized 6 months or 12 months after surgery, and the integrity of the colopexy was evaluated. After a 60-day recovery period, these horses were exercised for 2 months. Although each horse initially lost weight, the weight of all but 2 was acceptable at the conclusion of the study. Two horses that had technique-B colopexies had progressive weight loss serious enough to warrant euthanasia. Both colopexy techniques prevented manual creation of large-colon displacement and large-colon volvulus centered at the sternal and diaphragmatic flexures. Technique-A colopexy also prevented manual creation of volvulus of the large colon centered at its base.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

AB - A study was designed to evaluate 2 colopexy techniques (A and B) in 8 clinically normal horses to determine which technique would prevent recurrence of large-colon displacement and/or volvulus. For technique A, 35 cm of the lateral free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the abdominal wall, 6 cm to the left of ventral midline. For technique B, the medial free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the medial free band of the right ventral colon, and 8 cm of the lateral free band of the left ventral colon was sutured to the abdominal wall, 6 cm to the left of ventral midline. One horse from each group was euthanatized at 6 months, and another at 12 months after surgery. The position of the large colon, the integrity of the colopexy, and other adhesions within the abdominal cavity were evaluated. At necropsy, attempts were made to manually create displacement and volvulus of the large colon. The remaining horses in each group were anesthetized 6 months or 12 months after surgery, and the integrity of the colopexy was evaluated. After a 60-day recovery period, these horses were exercised for 2 months. Although each horse initially lost weight, the weight of all but 2 was acceptable at the conclusion of the study. Two horses that had technique-B colopexies had progressive weight loss serious enough to warrant euthanasia. Both colopexy techniques prevented manual creation of large-colon displacement and large-colon volvulus centered at the sternal and diaphragmatic flexures. Technique-A colopexy also prevented manual creation of volvulus of the large colon centered at its base.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023959541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023959541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3356571

AN - SCOPUS:0023959541

VL - 192

SP - 354

EP - 357

JO - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

JF - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

SN - 0003-1488

IS - 3

ER -