Colonoscopy: Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists

Peter B. Cotton, Patrick Connor, Daniel McGee, Paul Jowell, Nick Nickl, Steve Schutz, Joseph Leung, John Lee, Eric Libby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The medical profession, payers, and patients are interested increasingly in the quality of endoscopic procedures, including colonoscopy. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has recommended "report cards" by which endoscopists may keep track of certain key elements of their practice including indications, findings, duration, technical end points, complications, and patient satisfaction. Methods: The GI-Trac endoscopy reporting database includes many of the data points recommended by ASGE for report cards. Seven hospital centers in North America have been collecting data prospectively for varying periods since 1994. These data were aggregated and analyzed by individual endoscopist. A total of 69 endoscopists performed 17,868 colonoscopies. Results: Twelve percent of the endoscopists reported that more than 20% of procedures they performed were completely normal. The average time taken by 27% of endoscopists was more than 40 minutes (without trainees involved), and only 55% achieved a cecal intubation rate of over 90%; for 9% the rate was less than 80%. Complication rates were too low for individual comparisons. Conclusion: These data provide an idea of colonoscopy performance by individual endoscopists in mainly academic centers. Incorporating all recommended data elements in future reporting databases will contribute to meaningful bench marking and to quality improvement efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)352-357
Number of pages6
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Databases
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
North America
Quality Improvement
Patient Satisfaction
Intubation
Endoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Cotton, P. B., Connor, P., McGee, D., Jowell, P., Nickl, N., Schutz, S., ... Libby, E. (2003). Colonoscopy: Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 57(3), 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2003.121

Colonoscopy : Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists. / Cotton, Peter B.; Connor, Patrick; McGee, Daniel; Jowell, Paul; Nickl, Nick; Schutz, Steve; Leung, Joseph; Lee, John; Libby, Eric.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 57, No. 3, 01.03.2003, p. 352-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cotton, PB, Connor, P, McGee, D, Jowell, P, Nickl, N, Schutz, S, Leung, J, Lee, J & Libby, E 2003, 'Colonoscopy: Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2003.121
Cotton PB, Connor P, McGee D, Jowell P, Nickl N, Schutz S et al. Colonoscopy: Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003 Mar 1;57(3):352-357. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2003.121
Cotton, Peter B. ; Connor, Patrick ; McGee, Daniel ; Jowell, Paul ; Nickl, Nick ; Schutz, Steve ; Leung, Joseph ; Lee, John ; Libby, Eric. / Colonoscopy : Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003 ; Vol. 57, No. 3. pp. 352-357.
@article{08138cfcac40406788c6db887b56143e,
title = "Colonoscopy: Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists",
abstract = "Background: The medical profession, payers, and patients are interested increasingly in the quality of endoscopic procedures, including colonoscopy. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has recommended {"}report cards{"} by which endoscopists may keep track of certain key elements of their practice including indications, findings, duration, technical end points, complications, and patient satisfaction. Methods: The GI-Trac endoscopy reporting database includes many of the data points recommended by ASGE for report cards. Seven hospital centers in North America have been collecting data prospectively for varying periods since 1994. These data were aggregated and analyzed by individual endoscopist. A total of 69 endoscopists performed 17,868 colonoscopies. Results: Twelve percent of the endoscopists reported that more than 20{\%} of procedures they performed were completely normal. The average time taken by 27{\%} of endoscopists was more than 40 minutes (without trainees involved), and only 55{\%} achieved a cecal intubation rate of over 90{\%}; for 9{\%} the rate was less than 80{\%}. Complication rates were too low for individual comparisons. Conclusion: These data provide an idea of colonoscopy performance by individual endoscopists in mainly academic centers. Incorporating all recommended data elements in future reporting databases will contribute to meaningful bench marking and to quality improvement efforts.",
author = "Cotton, {Peter B.} and Patrick Connor and Daniel McGee and Paul Jowell and Nick Nickl and Steve Schutz and Joseph Leung and John Lee and Eric Libby",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1067/mge.2003.121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "352--357",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colonoscopy

T2 - Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists

AU - Cotton, Peter B.

AU - Connor, Patrick

AU - McGee, Daniel

AU - Jowell, Paul

AU - Nickl, Nick

AU - Schutz, Steve

AU - Leung, Joseph

AU - Lee, John

AU - Libby, Eric

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - Background: The medical profession, payers, and patients are interested increasingly in the quality of endoscopic procedures, including colonoscopy. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has recommended "report cards" by which endoscopists may keep track of certain key elements of their practice including indications, findings, duration, technical end points, complications, and patient satisfaction. Methods: The GI-Trac endoscopy reporting database includes many of the data points recommended by ASGE for report cards. Seven hospital centers in North America have been collecting data prospectively for varying periods since 1994. These data were aggregated and analyzed by individual endoscopist. A total of 69 endoscopists performed 17,868 colonoscopies. Results: Twelve percent of the endoscopists reported that more than 20% of procedures they performed were completely normal. The average time taken by 27% of endoscopists was more than 40 minutes (without trainees involved), and only 55% achieved a cecal intubation rate of over 90%; for 9% the rate was less than 80%. Complication rates were too low for individual comparisons. Conclusion: These data provide an idea of colonoscopy performance by individual endoscopists in mainly academic centers. Incorporating all recommended data elements in future reporting databases will contribute to meaningful bench marking and to quality improvement efforts.

AB - Background: The medical profession, payers, and patients are interested increasingly in the quality of endoscopic procedures, including colonoscopy. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has recommended "report cards" by which endoscopists may keep track of certain key elements of their practice including indications, findings, duration, technical end points, complications, and patient satisfaction. Methods: The GI-Trac endoscopy reporting database includes many of the data points recommended by ASGE for report cards. Seven hospital centers in North America have been collecting data prospectively for varying periods since 1994. These data were aggregated and analyzed by individual endoscopist. A total of 69 endoscopists performed 17,868 colonoscopies. Results: Twelve percent of the endoscopists reported that more than 20% of procedures they performed were completely normal. The average time taken by 27% of endoscopists was more than 40 minutes (without trainees involved), and only 55% achieved a cecal intubation rate of over 90%; for 9% the rate was less than 80%. Complication rates were too low for individual comparisons. Conclusion: These data provide an idea of colonoscopy performance by individual endoscopists in mainly academic centers. Incorporating all recommended data elements in future reporting databases will contribute to meaningful bench marking and to quality improvement efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037346142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037346142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mge.2003.121

DO - 10.1067/mge.2003.121

M3 - Article

C2 - 12612515

AN - SCOPUS:0037346142

VL - 57

SP - 352

EP - 357

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 3

ER -