Coexamination of site-specific transcription factor binding and promoter activity in living cells

Kathryn E. Boyd, Peggy J. Farnham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

145 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previously, we have used a chromatin cross-linking and immunoprecipitation protocol for the analysis of Myc and USF binding to the cad promoter. The adaptation of this technique for the study of mammalian transcription factors was a big step forward in the analysis of transcription factor family member specificity, allowing for the first time a definitive knowledge of which factor binds to a promoter region under normal physiological conditions. However, due to limitations of the assay, our previous studies could not definitively prove that both Myc and USF bound to the exact same site on the cad promoter, nor could we directly correlate loss of in vivo binding of a particular factor with loss of transcriptional activity. Therefore, we have further modified the chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol to alleviate these problems. We have now shown that it is possible to coexamine growth-regulated transcriptional activity and promoter occupancy by using stably integrated promoter constructs. We show that both Myc and USF bind to the exact same E box on the cad promoter, suggesting that competition between these two factors for a single site occurs in living cells. We also find that cad promoter constructs that retain USF binding but lose Myc binding in vivo no longer display an increase in transcriptional activity in mid- to late G1 phase of the cell cycle. Finally, we propose that cell cycle-regulated transcriptional activation of the cad promoter may be a stochastic, rather than a predetermined, process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8393-8399
Number of pages7
JournalMolecular and Cellular Biology
Volume19
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cell Cycle
Transcription Factors
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
G1 Phase
Immunoprecipitation
Genetic Promoter Regions
Transcriptional Activation
Chromatin
Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Coexamination of site-specific transcription factor binding and promoter activity in living cells. / Boyd, Kathryn E.; Farnham, Peggy J.

In: Molecular and Cellular Biology, Vol. 19, No. 12, 12.1999, p. 8393-8399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boyd, Kathryn E. ; Farnham, Peggy J. / Coexamination of site-specific transcription factor binding and promoter activity in living cells. In: Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1999 ; Vol. 19, No. 12. pp. 8393-8399.
@article{e73dec6d3c7846acbf74965ae6bafb9c,
title = "Coexamination of site-specific transcription factor binding and promoter activity in living cells",
abstract = "Previously, we have used a chromatin cross-linking and immunoprecipitation protocol for the analysis of Myc and USF binding to the cad promoter. The adaptation of this technique for the study of mammalian transcription factors was a big step forward in the analysis of transcription factor family member specificity, allowing for the first time a definitive knowledge of which factor binds to a promoter region under normal physiological conditions. However, due to limitations of the assay, our previous studies could not definitively prove that both Myc and USF bound to the exact same site on the cad promoter, nor could we directly correlate loss of in vivo binding of a particular factor with loss of transcriptional activity. Therefore, we have further modified the chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol to alleviate these problems. We have now shown that it is possible to coexamine growth-regulated transcriptional activity and promoter occupancy by using stably integrated promoter constructs. We show that both Myc and USF bind to the exact same E box on the cad promoter, suggesting that competition between these two factors for a single site occurs in living cells. We also find that cad promoter constructs that retain USF binding but lose Myc binding in vivo no longer display an increase in transcriptional activity in mid- to late G1 phase of the cell cycle. Finally, we propose that cell cycle-regulated transcriptional activation of the cad promoter may be a stochastic, rather than a predetermined, process.",
author = "Boyd, {Kathryn E.} and Farnham, {Peggy J.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "8393--8399",
journal = "Molecular and Cellular Biology",
issn = "0270-7306",
publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coexamination of site-specific transcription factor binding and promoter activity in living cells

AU - Boyd, Kathryn E.

AU - Farnham, Peggy J.

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - Previously, we have used a chromatin cross-linking and immunoprecipitation protocol for the analysis of Myc and USF binding to the cad promoter. The adaptation of this technique for the study of mammalian transcription factors was a big step forward in the analysis of transcription factor family member specificity, allowing for the first time a definitive knowledge of which factor binds to a promoter region under normal physiological conditions. However, due to limitations of the assay, our previous studies could not definitively prove that both Myc and USF bound to the exact same site on the cad promoter, nor could we directly correlate loss of in vivo binding of a particular factor with loss of transcriptional activity. Therefore, we have further modified the chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol to alleviate these problems. We have now shown that it is possible to coexamine growth-regulated transcriptional activity and promoter occupancy by using stably integrated promoter constructs. We show that both Myc and USF bind to the exact same E box on the cad promoter, suggesting that competition between these two factors for a single site occurs in living cells. We also find that cad promoter constructs that retain USF binding but lose Myc binding in vivo no longer display an increase in transcriptional activity in mid- to late G1 phase of the cell cycle. Finally, we propose that cell cycle-regulated transcriptional activation of the cad promoter may be a stochastic, rather than a predetermined, process.

AB - Previously, we have used a chromatin cross-linking and immunoprecipitation protocol for the analysis of Myc and USF binding to the cad promoter. The adaptation of this technique for the study of mammalian transcription factors was a big step forward in the analysis of transcription factor family member specificity, allowing for the first time a definitive knowledge of which factor binds to a promoter region under normal physiological conditions. However, due to limitations of the assay, our previous studies could not definitively prove that both Myc and USF bound to the exact same site on the cad promoter, nor could we directly correlate loss of in vivo binding of a particular factor with loss of transcriptional activity. Therefore, we have further modified the chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol to alleviate these problems. We have now shown that it is possible to coexamine growth-regulated transcriptional activity and promoter occupancy by using stably integrated promoter constructs. We show that both Myc and USF bind to the exact same E box on the cad promoter, suggesting that competition between these two factors for a single site occurs in living cells. We also find that cad promoter constructs that retain USF binding but lose Myc binding in vivo no longer display an increase in transcriptional activity in mid- to late G1 phase of the cell cycle. Finally, we propose that cell cycle-regulated transcriptional activation of the cad promoter may be a stochastic, rather than a predetermined, process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033499728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033499728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10567564

AN - SCOPUS:0033499728

VL - 19

SP - 8393

EP - 8399

JO - Molecular and Cellular Biology

JF - Molecular and Cellular Biology

SN - 0270-7306

IS - 12

ER -