Clinical trial design-effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in infants and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Martha A Q Curley, John H. Arnold, John E. Thompson, James C. Fackler, Mary Jo Grant, Lori D. Fineman, Natalie Cvijanovich, Frederick E. Barr, Shirley Molitor-Kirsch, David M. Steinhorn, Michael A. Matthay, Patricia L. Hibberd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper describes the methodology of a clinical trial of prone positioning in pediatric patients with acute lung injury (ALI). Nonrandomized studies suggest that prone positioning improves oxygenation in patients with ALI/acute respiratory distress syndrome without the risk of serious iatrogenic injury. It is not known if these improvements in oxygenation result in improvements in clinical outcomes. A clinical trial was needed to answer this question. Materials and Methods: The pediatric prone study is a multicenter, randomized, noncrossover, controlled clinical trial. The trial is designed to test the hypothesis that at the end of 28 days, children with ALI treated with prone positioning will have more ventilator-free days than children treated with supine positioning. Secondary end points include the time to recovery of lung injury, organ failure-free days, functional outcome, adverse events, and mortality from all causes. Pediatric patients, 42 weeks postconceptual age to 18 years of age, are enrolled within 48 hours of meeting ALI criteria. Patients randomized to the prone group are positioned prone within 4 hours of randomization and remain prone for 20 hours each day during the acute phase of their illness for a maximum of 7 days. Both groups are managed according to ventilator protocol, extubation readiness testing, and sedation protocols and hemodynamic, nutrition, and skin care guidelines. Conclusions: This paper describes the process, multidisciplinary input, and procedures used to support the design of the clinical trial, as well as the challenges faced by the clinical scientists during the conduct of the clinical trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-32
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Acute Lung Injury
Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Clinical Trials
Mechanical Ventilators
Pediatrics
Skin Care
Lung Injury
Random Allocation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Hemodynamics
Guidelines
Mortality
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Acute lung injury
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
  • Clinical trial
  • Multisite study
  • Position
  • Prone
  • Research methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Curley, M. A. Q., Arnold, J. H., Thompson, J. E., Fackler, J. C., Grant, M. J., Fineman, L. D., ... Hibberd, P. L. (2006). Clinical trial design-effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in infants and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Journal of Critical Care, 21(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.12.004

Clinical trial design-effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in infants and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. / Curley, Martha A Q; Arnold, John H.; Thompson, John E.; Fackler, James C.; Grant, Mary Jo; Fineman, Lori D.; Cvijanovich, Natalie; Barr, Frederick E.; Molitor-Kirsch, Shirley; Steinhorn, David M.; Matthay, Michael A.; Hibberd, Patricia L.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 21, No. 1, 03.2006, p. 23-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curley, MAQ, Arnold, JH, Thompson, JE, Fackler, JC, Grant, MJ, Fineman, LD, Cvijanovich, N, Barr, FE, Molitor-Kirsch, S, Steinhorn, DM, Matthay, MA & Hibberd, PL 2006, 'Clinical trial design-effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in infants and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome', Journal of Critical Care, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.12.004
Curley, Martha A Q ; Arnold, John H. ; Thompson, John E. ; Fackler, James C. ; Grant, Mary Jo ; Fineman, Lori D. ; Cvijanovich, Natalie ; Barr, Frederick E. ; Molitor-Kirsch, Shirley ; Steinhorn, David M. ; Matthay, Michael A. ; Hibberd, Patricia L. / Clinical trial design-effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in infants and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. In: Journal of Critical Care. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 23-32.
@article{6b07781bd75b4ed1ad9e801da17a3c25,
title = "Clinical trial design-effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in infants and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper describes the methodology of a clinical trial of prone positioning in pediatric patients with acute lung injury (ALI). Nonrandomized studies suggest that prone positioning improves oxygenation in patients with ALI/acute respiratory distress syndrome without the risk of serious iatrogenic injury. It is not known if these improvements in oxygenation result in improvements in clinical outcomes. A clinical trial was needed to answer this question. Materials and Methods: The pediatric prone study is a multicenter, randomized, noncrossover, controlled clinical trial. The trial is designed to test the hypothesis that at the end of 28 days, children with ALI treated with prone positioning will have more ventilator-free days than children treated with supine positioning. Secondary end points include the time to recovery of lung injury, organ failure-free days, functional outcome, adverse events, and mortality from all causes. Pediatric patients, 42 weeks postconceptual age to 18 years of age, are enrolled within 48 hours of meeting ALI criteria. Patients randomized to the prone group are positioned prone within 4 hours of randomization and remain prone for 20 hours each day during the acute phase of their illness for a maximum of 7 days. Both groups are managed according to ventilator protocol, extubation readiness testing, and sedation protocols and hemodynamic, nutrition, and skin care guidelines. Conclusions: This paper describes the process, multidisciplinary input, and procedures used to support the design of the clinical trial, as well as the challenges faced by the clinical scientists during the conduct of the clinical trial.",
keywords = "Acute lung injury, Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), Clinical trial, Multisite study, Position, Prone, Research methods",
author = "Curley, {Martha A Q} and Arnold, {John H.} and Thompson, {John E.} and Fackler, {James C.} and Grant, {Mary Jo} and Fineman, {Lori D.} and Natalie Cvijanovich and Barr, {Frederick E.} and Shirley Molitor-Kirsch and Steinhorn, {David M.} and Matthay, {Michael A.} and Hibberd, {Patricia L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "23--32",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical trial design-effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in infants and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome

AU - Curley, Martha A Q

AU - Arnold, John H.

AU - Thompson, John E.

AU - Fackler, James C.

AU - Grant, Mary Jo

AU - Fineman, Lori D.

AU - Cvijanovich, Natalie

AU - Barr, Frederick E.

AU - Molitor-Kirsch, Shirley

AU - Steinhorn, David M.

AU - Matthay, Michael A.

AU - Hibberd, Patricia L.

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Purpose: This paper describes the methodology of a clinical trial of prone positioning in pediatric patients with acute lung injury (ALI). Nonrandomized studies suggest that prone positioning improves oxygenation in patients with ALI/acute respiratory distress syndrome without the risk of serious iatrogenic injury. It is not known if these improvements in oxygenation result in improvements in clinical outcomes. A clinical trial was needed to answer this question. Materials and Methods: The pediatric prone study is a multicenter, randomized, noncrossover, controlled clinical trial. The trial is designed to test the hypothesis that at the end of 28 days, children with ALI treated with prone positioning will have more ventilator-free days than children treated with supine positioning. Secondary end points include the time to recovery of lung injury, organ failure-free days, functional outcome, adverse events, and mortality from all causes. Pediatric patients, 42 weeks postconceptual age to 18 years of age, are enrolled within 48 hours of meeting ALI criteria. Patients randomized to the prone group are positioned prone within 4 hours of randomization and remain prone for 20 hours each day during the acute phase of their illness for a maximum of 7 days. Both groups are managed according to ventilator protocol, extubation readiness testing, and sedation protocols and hemodynamic, nutrition, and skin care guidelines. Conclusions: This paper describes the process, multidisciplinary input, and procedures used to support the design of the clinical trial, as well as the challenges faced by the clinical scientists during the conduct of the clinical trial.

AB - Purpose: This paper describes the methodology of a clinical trial of prone positioning in pediatric patients with acute lung injury (ALI). Nonrandomized studies suggest that prone positioning improves oxygenation in patients with ALI/acute respiratory distress syndrome without the risk of serious iatrogenic injury. It is not known if these improvements in oxygenation result in improvements in clinical outcomes. A clinical trial was needed to answer this question. Materials and Methods: The pediatric prone study is a multicenter, randomized, noncrossover, controlled clinical trial. The trial is designed to test the hypothesis that at the end of 28 days, children with ALI treated with prone positioning will have more ventilator-free days than children treated with supine positioning. Secondary end points include the time to recovery of lung injury, organ failure-free days, functional outcome, adverse events, and mortality from all causes. Pediatric patients, 42 weeks postconceptual age to 18 years of age, are enrolled within 48 hours of meeting ALI criteria. Patients randomized to the prone group are positioned prone within 4 hours of randomization and remain prone for 20 hours each day during the acute phase of their illness for a maximum of 7 days. Both groups are managed according to ventilator protocol, extubation readiness testing, and sedation protocols and hemodynamic, nutrition, and skin care guidelines. Conclusions: This paper describes the process, multidisciplinary input, and procedures used to support the design of the clinical trial, as well as the challenges faced by the clinical scientists during the conduct of the clinical trial.

KW - Acute lung injury

KW - Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

KW - Clinical trial

KW - Multisite study

KW - Position

KW - Prone

KW - Research methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645988578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645988578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.12.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 16616620

AN - SCOPUS:33645988578

VL - 21

SP - 23

EP - 32

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

IS - 1

ER -